Advertisement

World Journal of Urology

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 3–13 | Cite as

Epidemiology, prevention, screening, diagnosis, and evaluation: update of the ICUD–SIU joint consultation on bladder cancer

  • Mario I. Fernández
  • Maurizio Brausi
  • Peter E. Clark
  • Michael S. Cookson
  • H. Barton Grossman
  • Makarand Khochikar
  • Lambertus A. Kiemeney
  • Bernard Malavaud
  • Rafael Sanchez-Salas
  • Mark S. Soloway
  • Robert S. Svatek
  • Raghunandan Vikram
  • Alina Vrieling
  • Ashish M. KamatEmail author
Topic Paper

Abstract

Purpose

To update current recommendations on prevention, screening, diagnosis, and evaluation of bladder cancer (BC) based on a thorough assessment of the most recent literature on these topics.

Methods

A non-systematic review was performed, including articles until June 2017. A variety of original articles, reviews, and editorials were selected according to their epidemiologic, demographic, and clinical relevance. Assessment of the level of evidence and grade of recommendations was performed according to the International Consultation on Urological Diseases grading system.

Results

BC is the ninth most common cancer worldwide with 430,000 new cases in 2012. Currently, approximately 165,000 people die from the disease annually. Absolute incidence and prevalence of BC are expected to rise significantly during the next decades because of population ageing. Tobacco smoking is still the main risk factor, accounting for about 50% of cases. Smoking cessation is, therefore, the most relevant recommendation in terms of prevention, as the risk of developing BC drops almost 40% within 5 years of cessation. BC screening is not recommended for the general population. BC diagnosis remains mainly based on cystoscopy, but development of new endoscopic and imaging technologies may rapidly change the diagnosis algorithm. The same applies for local, regional, and distant staging modalities.

Conclusions

A thorough understanding of epidemiology, risk factors, early detection strategies, diagnosis, and evaluation is essential for correct, evidence-based management of BC patients. Recent developments in endoscopic techniques and imaging raise the hope for providing better risk-adopted approaches and thereby improving clinical outcomes.

Keywords

Neoplasm, urinary bladder Risk factor Primary prevention Early detection of cancer Cystoscopy Neoplasm staging 

Notes

Author contributions

MIF: data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing. LAK: data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing. MSC: data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing. AV: data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing. HBG: data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing. MK: data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing. PEC: data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing. BM: data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing. RS-S: data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing. MSS: data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing. RS-S: data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing. RV: data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing. MB: project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing. AMK: project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, and editing.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

MCookson has received personal fees from Jansenn Biotech, MDxHealth, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Genomic Health, Carden Jennings, Abbott, and Altor. HB Grossman has received personal fees from Abbott Molecular, Cepheid, and Nucleix. A Kamat is a consultant to the following companies; TMC Innovation, Merck, BMS, Arquer, MDxHealth, Photocure, Theralase, Cepheid, Medac, Asieris, Pfizer, and Astra Zeneca and has received research funding from FKD, Merck, Telesta, and Adolor. In addition, A Kamat has a patent CyPRIT—Cytokine Panel for Response to Intravesical Immunotherapy pending. The rest of the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not required, since this article does not contain any studies with human participants.

References

  1. 1.
    GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 (2013) International agency for research on cancer. http://globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed 24 Sept 2017
  2. 2.
    Dobruch J, Daneshmand S, Fisch M, Lotan Y, Noon AP, Resnick MJ, Shariat SF, Zlotta AR, Boorjian SA (2016) Gender and bladder cancer: a collaborative review of etiology, biology, and outcomes. Eur Urol 69(2):300–310.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.037 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marcos-Gragera R, Mallone S, Kiemeney LA, Vilardell L, Malats N, Allory Y, Sant M (2015) Urinary tract cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007: Results of the population-based study EUROCARE-5. Europ J Cancer (Oxf Engl 1990) 51(15):2217–2230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.028 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Human Development Reports. (2016) United Nations development programme. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2016_human_development_report.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2018
  5. 5.
    Kluth LA, Rieken M, Xylinas E, Kent M, Rink M, Roupret M, Sharifi N, Jamzadeh A, Kassouf W, Kaushik D, Boorjian SA, Roghmann F, Noldus J, Masson-Lecomte A, Vordos D, Ikeda M, Matsumoto K, Hagiwara M, Kikuchi E, Fradet Y, Izawa J, Rendon R, Fairey A, Lotan Y, Bachmann A, Zerbib M, Fisch M, Scherr DS, Vickers A, Shariat SF (2014) Gender-specific differences in clinicopathologic outcomes following radical cystectomy: an international multi-institutional study of more than 8000 patients. Eur Urol 66(5):913–919.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.040 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thorstenson A, Hagberg O, Ljungberg B, Liedberg F, Jancke G, Holmang S, Malmstrom PU, Hosseini A, Jahnson S (2016) Gender-related differences in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a population-based study from the Swedish national registry of urinary bladder cancer. Scand J Urol 50(4):292–297.  https://doi.org/10.3109/21681805.2016.1158207 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Puente D, Malats N, Cecchini L, Tardon A, Garcia-Closas R, Serra C, Carrato A, Sala M, Boixeda R, Dosemeci M, Real FX, Kogevinas M (2003) Gender-related differences in clinical and pathological characteristics and therapy of bladder cancer. Eur Urol 43(1):53–62Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Soave A, Dahlem R, Hansen J, Weisbach L, Minner S, Engel O, Kluth LA, Chun FK, Shariat SF, Fisch M, Rink M (2015) Gender-specific outcomes of bladder cancer patients: a stage-specific analysis in a contemporary, homogenous radical cystectomy cohort. Euro J Surg Oncol 41(3):368–377.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.003 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sjostrom C, Thorstenson A, Strock V, Hosseini-Aliabad A, Aljabery F, Liedberg F, Sherif A, Malmstrom PU, Rosell J, Gardmark T, Jahnson S (2018) Treatment according to guidelines may bridge the gender gap in outcome for patients with stage T1 urinary bladder cancer. Scand J Urol.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2018.1462254 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burger M, Catto JW, Dalbagni G, Grossman HB, Herr H, Karakiewicz P, Kassouf W, Kiemeney LA, La Vecchia C, Shariat S, Lotan Y (2013) Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol 63(2):234–241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.033 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rafnar T, Vermeulen SH, Sulem P, Thorleifsson G, Aben KK, Witjes JA, Grotenhuis AJ, Verhaegh GW, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Besenbacher S, Gudbjartsson D, Stacey SN, Gudmundsson J, Johannsdottir H, Bjarnason H, Zanon C, Helgadottir H, Jonasson JG, Tryggvadottir L, Jonsson E, Geirsson G, Nikulasson S, Petursdottir V, Bishop DT, Chung-Sak S, Choudhury A, Elliott F, Barrett JH, Knowles MA, de Verdier PJ, Ryk C, Lindblom A, Rudnai P, Gurzau E, Koppova K, Vineis P, Polidoro S, Guarrera S, Sacerdote C, Panadero A, Sanz-Velez JI, Sanchez M, Valdivia G, Garcia-Prats MD, Hengstler JG, Selinski S, Gerullis H, Ovsiannikov D, Khezri A, Aminsharifi A, Malekzadeh M, van den Berg LH, Ophoff RA, Veldink JH, Zeegers MP, Kellen E, Fostinelli J, Andreoli D, Arici C, Porru S, Buntinx F, Ghaderi A, Golka K, Mayordomo JI, Matullo G, Kumar R, Steineck G, Kiltie AE, Kong A, Thorsteinsdottir U, Stefansson K, Kiemeney LA (2011) European genome-wide association study identifies SLC14A1 as a new urinary bladder cancer susceptibility gene. Hum Mol Genet 20(21):4268–4281.  https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddr303 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheng S, Andrew AS, Andrews PC, Moore JH (2016) Complex systems analysis of bladder cancer susceptibility reveals a role for decarboxylase activity in two genome-wide association studies. BioData Min 9:40.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-016-0119-z Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jacobs BL, Montgomery JS, Zhang Y, Skolarus TA, Weizer AZ, Hollenbeck BK (2012) Disparities in bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 30(1):81–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.08.011 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mouw T, Koster A, Wright ME, Blank MM, Moore SC, Hollenbeck A, Schatzkin A (2008) Education and risk of cancer in a large cohort of men and women in the United States. PLoS One 3(11):e3639.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003639 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leppert JT, Shvarts O, Kawaoka K, Lieberman R, Belldegrun AS, Pantuck AJ (2006) Prevention of bladder cancer: a review. Eur Urol 49(2):226–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.011 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abol-Enein H (2008) Infection: is it a cause of bladder cancer? Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 218:79–84.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03008880802325309 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gutierrez J, Jimenez A, de Dios Luna J, Soto MJ, Sorlozano A (2006) Meta-analysis of studies analyzing the relationship between bladder cancer and infection by human papillomavirus. J Urol 176(6 Pt 1):2474–2481.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.157 (discussion 2481) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ron E, Preston DL, Mabuchi K, Thompson DE, Soda M (1994) Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part IV: comparison of cancer incidence and mortality. Radiat Res 137(2 Suppl):S98–S112Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wallis CJ, Mahar AL, Choo R, Herschorn S, Kodama RT, Shah PS, Danjoux C, Narod SA, Nam RK (2016) Second malignancies after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Clin Res ed) 352:i851.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i851 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nilsson S, Ullen A (2008) Chemotherapy-induced bladder cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 218:89–92.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03008880802291832 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Freedman ND, Silverman DT, Hollenbeck AR, Schatzkin A, Abnet CC (2011) Association between smoking and risk of bladder cancer among men and women. JAMA 306(7):737–745.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1142 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cumberbatch MG, Cox A, Teare D, Catto JW (2015) Contemporary occupational carcinogen exposure and bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 1(9):1282–1290.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3209 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brennan P, Bogillot O, Cordier S, Greiser E, Schill W, Vineis P, Lopez-Abente G, Tzonou A, Chang-Claude J, Bolm-Audorff U, Jockel KH, Donato F, Serra C, Wahrendorf J, Hours M, T’Mannetje A, Kogevinas M, Boffetta P (2000) Cigarette smoking and bladder cancer in men: a pooled analysis of 11 case-control studies. Int J Cancer 86(2):289–294Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    van Osch FH, Jochems SH, van Schooten FJ, Bryan RT, Zeegers MP (2016) Quantified relations between exposure to tobacco smoking and bladder cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 89 observational studies. Int J Epidemiol 45(3):857–870.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw044 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bjurlin MA, Cohn MR, Kim DY, Freeman VL, Lombardo L, Hurley SD, Hollowell CM (2013) Brief smoking cessation intervention: a prospective trial in the urology setting. J Urol 189(5):1843–1849.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.075 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Al-Zalabani AH, Stewart KF, Wesselius A, Schols AM, Zeegers MP (2016) Modifiable risk factors for the prevention of bladder cancer: a systematic review of meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 31(9):811–851.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-016-0138-6 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sun JW, Zhao LG, Yang Y, Ma X, Wang YY, Xiang YB (2015) Obesity and risk of bladder cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis of 15 cohort studies. PLoS One 10(3):e0119313.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119313 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhao L, Tian X, Duan X, Ye Y, Sun M, Huang J (2017) Association of body mass index with bladder cancer risk: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Oncotarget 8(20):33990–34000.  https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16722 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Keimling M, Behrens G, Schmid D, Jochem C, Leitzmann MF (2014) The association between physical activity and bladder cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 110(7):1862–1870.  https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.77 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Buchner FL, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Ros MM, Kampman E, Egevad L, Overvad K, Tjonneland A, Roswall N, Clavel-Chapelon F, Boutron-Ruault MC, Touillaud M, Kaaks R, Chang-Claude J, Boeing H, Weikert S, Trichopoulou A, Naska A, Benetou V, Palli D, Sieri S, Vineis P, Tumino R, Panico S, van Duijnhoven FJ, Peeters PH, van Gils CH, Lund E, Gram IT, Sanchez MJ, Jakszyn P, Larranaga N, Ardanaz E, Navarro C, Rodriguez L, Manjer J, Ehrnstrom R, Hallmans G, Ljungberg B, Key TJ, Allen NE, Khaw KT, Wareham N, Slimani N, Jenab M, Boffetta P, Kiemeney LA, Riboli E (2011) Variety in vegetable and fruit consumption and risk of bladder cancer in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Int J Cancer 128(12):2971–2979.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25636 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jakszyn P, Gonzalez CA, Lujan-Barroso L, Ros MM, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Roswall N, Tjonneland AM, Buchner FL, Egevad L, Overvad K, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Clavel-Chapelon F, Boutron-Ruault MC, Touillaud MS, Chang-Claude J, Allen NE, Kiemeney LA, Key TJ, Kaaks R, Boeing H, Weikert S, Trichopoulou A, Oikonomou E, Zylis D, Palli D, Berrino F, Vineis P, Tumino R, Mattiello A, Peeters PH, Parr CL, Gram IT, Skeie G, Sanchez MJ, Larranaga N, Ardanaz E, Navarro C, Rodriguez L, Ulmert D, Ehrnstrom R, Hallmans G, Ljungberg B, Roddam AW, Bingham SA, Khaw KT, Slimani N, Boffetta PA, Jenab M, Mouw T, Michaud DS, Riboli E (2011) Red meat, dietary nitrosamines, and heme iron and risk of bladder cancer in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC). Cancer Epidemiol biomark Prev 20(3):555–559.  https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.Epi-10-0971 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Continuous Update Project Report: Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Bladder Cancer (2015) World cancer research fund international/american institute for cancer research. http://wcrf.org/bladder-cancer-2015. Accessed 30 Apr 2018
  33. 33.
    Messing EM, Madeb R, Young T, Gilchrist KW, Bram L, Greenberg EB, Wegenke JD, Stephenson L, Gee J, Feng C (2006) Long-term outcome of hematuria home screening for bladder cancer in men. Cancer 107(9):2173–2179.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22224 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bangma CH, Loeb S, Busstra M, Zhu X, El Bouazzaoui S, Refos J, Van Der Keur KA, Tjin S, Franken CG, van Leenders GJ, Zwarthoff EC, Roobol MJ (2013) Outcomes of a bladder cancer screening program using home hematuria testing and molecular markers. Eur Urol 64(1):41–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.02.036 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moyer VA (2011) Screening for bladder cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 155(4):246–251.  https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-4-201108160-00008 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wu X, Lin J, Grossman HB, Huang M, Gu J, Etzel CJ, Amos CI, Dinney CP, Spitz MR (2007) Projecting individualized probabilities of developing bladder cancer in white individuals. J Clin Oncol 25(31):4974–4981.  https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.10.7557 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hemstreet GP 3rd, Yin S, Ma Z, Bonner RB, Bi W, Rao JY, Zang M, Zheng Q, Bane B, Asal N, Li G, Feng P, Hurst RE, Wang W (2001) Biomarker risk assessment and bladder cancer detection in a cohort exposed to benzidine. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(6):427–436Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pesch B, Nasterlack M, Eberle F, Bonberg N, Taeger D, Leng G, Feil G, Johnen G, Ickstadt K, Kluckert M, Wellhausser H, Stenzl A, Bruning T (2011) The role of haematuria in bladder cancer screening among men with former occupational exposure to aromatic amines. BJU Int 108(4):546–552.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09971.x Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lotan Y, Elias K, Svatek RS, Bagrodia A, Nuss G, Moran B, Sagalowsky AI (2009) Bladder cancer screening in a high risk asymptomatic population using a point of care urine based protein tumor marker. J Urol 182(1):52–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.142 (discussion 58) Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Knowles MA, Hurst CD (2015) Molecular biology of bladder cancer: new insights into pathogenesis and clinical diversity. Nat Rev Cancer 15(1):25–41.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3817 Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Krabbe LM, Svatek RS, Shariat SF, Messing E, Lotan Y (2015) Bladder cancer risk: Use of the PLCO and NLST to identify a suitable screening cohort. Urol Oncol 33(2):65.e19–65.e25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.06.009 Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Okhunov Z, Hruby GW, Mirabile G, Marruffo F, Lehman DS, Benson MC, Gupta M, Landman J (2009) Prospective comparison of flexible fiberoptic and digital cystoscopes. Urology 74(2):427–430.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.01.007 Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nakai Y, Tatsumi Y, Miyake M, Anai S, Kuwada M, Onishi S, Chihara Y, Tanaka N, Hirao Y, Fujimoto K (2016) Expression of ferrochelatase has a strong correlation in protoporphyrin IX accumulation with photodynamic detection of bladder cancer. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther 13:225–232.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2015.07.174 Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mowatt G, N’Dow J, Vale L, Nabi G, Boachie C, Cook JA, Fraser C, Griffiths TR (2011) Photodynamic diagnosis of bladder cancer compared with white light cystoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 27(1):3–10.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462310001364 Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kausch I, Sommerauer M, Montorsi F, Stenzl A, Jacqmin D, Jichlinski P, Jocham D, Ziegler A, Vonthein R (2010) Photodynamic diagnosis in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of prospective studies. Eur Urol 57(4):595–606.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.041 Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Burger M, Grossman HB, Droller M, Schmidbauer J, Hermann G, Dragoescu O, Ray E, Fradet Y, Karl A, Burgues JP, Witjes JA, Stenzl A, Jichlinski P, Jocham D (2013) Photodynamic diagnosis of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer with hexaminolevulinate cystoscopy: a meta-analysis of detection and recurrence based on raw data. Eur Urol 64(5):846–854.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.059 Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Murata S, Iseki M, Kinjo M, Matsuzaki O, Moriuchi A, Ohtani H, Sakurai T, Satake T, Tsuzuki T (2010) Molecular and immunohistologic analyses cannot reliably solve diagnostic variation of flat intraepithelial lesions of the urinary bladder. Am J Clin Pathol 134(6):862–872.  https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcpacnudwen9gn4 Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lee JY, Cho KS, Kang DH, Jung HD, Kwon JK, Oh CK, Ham WS, Choi YD (2015) A network meta-analysis of therapeutic outcomes after new image technology-assisted transurethral resection for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: 5-aminolaevulinic acid fluorescence vs hexylaminolevulinate fluorescence vs narrow band imaging. BMC cancer 15:566.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1571-8 Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gakis G, Fahmy O (2016) Systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of hexaminolevulinate- versus white-light guided transurethral bladder tumor resection on progression in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Bladder Cancer (Amst Neth) 2(3):293–300.  https://doi.org/10.3233/blc-160060 Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Witjes JA, Babjuk M, Gontero P, Jacqmin D, Karl A, Kruck S, Mariappan P, Palou Redorta J, Stenzl A, van Velthoven R, Zaak D (2014) Clinical and cost effectiveness of hexaminolevulinate-guided blue-light cystoscopy: evidence review and updated expert recommendations. Eur Urol 66(5):863–871.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.037 Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tatsugami K, Kuroiwa K, Kamoto T, Nishiyama H, Watanabe J, Ishikawa S, Shinohara N, Sazawa A, Fukushima S, Naito S (2010) Evaluation of narrow-band imaging as a complementary method for the detection of bladder cancer. J Endourol 24(11):1807–1811.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0055 Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Herr H, Donat M, Dalbagni G, Taylor J (2010) Narrow-band imaging cystoscopy to evaluate bladder tumours—individual surgeon variability. BJU Int 106(1):53–55.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09119.x Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bryan RT, Shah ZH, Collins SI, Wallace DM (2010) Narrow-band imaging flexible cystoscopy: a new user’s experience. J Endourol 24(8):1339–1343.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0598 Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Li K, Lin T, Fan X, Duan Y, Huang J (2013) Diagnosis of narrow-band imaging in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Urol 20(6):602–609.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03211.x Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zheng C, Lv Y, Zhong Q, Wang R, Jiang Q (2012) Narrow band imaging diagnosis of bladder cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int 110((11 Pt B)):E680–E687.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11500.x Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Xiong Y, Li J, Ma S, Ge J, Zhou L, Li D, Chen Q (2017) A meta-analysis of narrow band imaging for the diagnosis and therapeutic outcome of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. PLoS One 12(2):e0170819.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170819 Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Naito S, Algaba F, Babjuk M, Bryan RT, Sun YH, Valiquette L, de la Rosette J (2016) The clinical research office of the endourological society (CROES) multicentre randomised trial of narrow band imaging-assisted transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) versus conventional white light imaging-assisted TURBT in primary non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients: trial protocol and 1-year results. Eur Urol 70(3):506–515.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.053 Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Anderson C, Weber R, Patel D, Lowrance W, Mellis A, Cookson M, Lang M, Barocas D, Chang S, Newberger E, Montgomery JS, Weizer AZ, Lee CT, Kava BR, Jackson M, Meraney A, Sjoberg D, Bochner B, Dalbagni G, Donat M, Herr H (2016) A 10-item checklist improves reporting of critical procedural elements during transurethral resection of bladder tumor. J Urol 196(4):1014–1020.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.151 Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zhao C, Tang K, Yang H, Xia D, Chen Z (2016) Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer: a meta-analysis. J Endourol 30(1):5–12.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0410 Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Datta SN, Allen GM, Evans R, Vaughton KC, Lucas MG (2002) Urinary tract ultrasonography in the evaluation of haematuria—a report of over 1000 cases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84(3):203–205Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Huguet J (2012) Transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract after cystectomy. Arch Esp Urol 65(2):227–236Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Tritschler S, Mosler C, Straub J, Buchner A, Karl A, Graser A, Stief C, Tilki D (2012) Staging of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: can computerized tomography help us to decide on local treatment? World J Urol 30(6):827–831.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0817-6 Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Panebianco V, Barchetti F, de Haas RJ, Pearson RA, Kennish SJ, Giannarini G, Catto JWF (2016) Improving staging in bladder cancer: the increasing role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Euro Urol Focus 2(2):113–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2016.04.010 Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Takeuchi M, Sasaki S, Ito M, Okada S, Takahashi S, Kawai T, Suzuki K, Oshima H, Hara M, Shibamoto Y (2009) Urinary bladder cancer: diffusion-weighted MR imaging—accuracy for diagnosing T stage and estimating histologic grade. Radiology 251(1):112–121.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2511080873 Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    El-Assmy A, Abou-El-Ghar ME, Mosbah A, El-Nahas AR, Refaie HF, Hekal IA, El-Diasty T, el Ibrahiem H (2009) Bladder tumour staging: comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol 19(7):1575–1581.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1340-7 Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Yoshida S, Koga F, Kobayashi S, Ishii C, Tanaka H, Tanaka H, Komai Y, Saito K, Masuda H, Fujii Y, Kawakami S, Kihara K (2012) Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in predicting sensitivity to chemoradiotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83(1):e21–e27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.065 Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Panebianco V, Narumi Y, Altun E, Bochner BH, Efstathiou JA, Hafeez S, Huddart R, Kennish S, Lerner S, Montironi R, Muglia VF, Salomon G, Thomas S, Vargas HA, Witjes JA, Takeuchi M, Barentsz J, Catto JWF (2018) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for bladder cancer: development of VI-RADS (Vesical Imaging-Reporting And Data System). Eur Urol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.04.029 Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Saokar A, Islam T, Jantsch M, Saksena MA, Hahn PF, Harisinghani MG (2010) Detection of lymph nodes in pelvic malignancies with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Imaging 34(5):361–366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.07.004 Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Birkhauser FD, Studer UE, Froehlich JM, Triantafyllou M, Bains LJ, Petralia G, Vermathen P, Fleischmann A, Thoeny HC (2013) Combined ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging facilitates detection of metastases in normal-sized pelvic lymph nodes of patients with bladder and prostate cancer. Eur Urol 64(6):953–960.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.07.032 Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Jeong IG, Hong S, You D, Hong JH, Ahn H, Kim CS (2015) FDG PET–CT for lymph node staging of bladder cancer: a prospective study of patients with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 22(9):3150–3156.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4369-7 Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    McInnes MD, Siemens DR, Mackillop WJ, Peng Y, Wei S, Schieda N, Booth CM (2016) Utilisation of preoperative imaging for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a population-based study. BJU Int 117(3):430–438.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13034 Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kibel AS, Dehdashti F, Katz MD, Klim AP, Grubb RL, Humphrey PA, Siegel C, Cao D, Gao F, Siegel BA (2009) Prospective study of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging of muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. J Clin oncol 27(26):4314–4320.  https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2008.20.6722 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario I. Fernández
    • 1
    • 2
  • Maurizio Brausi
    • 3
  • Peter E. Clark
    • 4
  • Michael S. Cookson
    • 5
  • H. Barton Grossman
    • 6
  • Makarand Khochikar
    • 7
  • Lambertus A. Kiemeney
    • 8
  • Bernard Malavaud
    • 9
  • Rafael Sanchez-Salas
    • 10
  • Mark S. Soloway
    • 11
  • Robert S. Svatek
    • 12
  • Raghunandan Vikram
    • 13
  • Alina Vrieling
    • 8
  • Ashish M. Kamat
    • 6
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of UrologyClínica AlemanaSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Faculty of MedicineClínica Alemana Universidad del DesarrolloSantiagoChile
  3. 3.Prostate Cancer UnitB. Ramazzini HospitalModenaItaly
  4. 4.Department of Urology, Atrium HealthLevine Cancer InstituteCharlotteUSA
  5. 5.Department of UrologyThe University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center & The Stephenson Cancer CenterOklahoma CityUSA
  6. 6.Department of Urology, Unit 1373The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA
  7. 7.Department of UrologySiddhi Vinayak Ganapati Cancer HospitalMirajIndia
  8. 8.Radboud Institute for Health SciencesRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
  9. 9.Department of UrologyToulouse Cancer InstituteToulouseFrance
  10. 10.Department of UrologyL’Institut Mutualiste MontsourisParisFrance
  11. 11.Department of UrologyMemorial Healthcare SystemMiamiUSA
  12. 12.Department of UrologyUniversity of Texas HealthSan AntonioUSA
  13. 13.Department of RadiologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations