Advertisement

World Journal of Urology

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 201–207 | Cite as

How bothersome double-J ureteral stents are after semirigid and flexible ureteroscopy: a prospective single-institution observational study

  • Andrea BosioEmail author
  • Eugenio Alessandria
  • Ettore Dalmasso
  • Dario Peretti
  • Simone Agosti
  • Alessandro Bisconti
  • Paolo Destefanis
  • Roberto Passera
  • Paolo Gontero
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate in details the actual extent of double-J stent-related symptoms after semirigid (URS) and flexible (RIRS) ureteroscopy using a validated questionnaire.

Methods

We asked to complete the Ureteric Stent Symptoms Questionnaire (USSQ) to all stone patients undergoing URS or RIRS with stent placement from 2010 to 2015. Stent-related symptoms’ prevalence, severity, and impact on daily life were analyzed using descriptive statistics and five-order Likert scales. Subgroups analyses were performed.

Results

232 patients completed the USSQ. Stents had a deep impact on urinary symptoms (daily frequency ≥ 1 per hour 59.1%, ≥ 1 nocturnal micturition 90.1%, urgency 86.6%, burning 82.3%) that represented a problem for 88.4% of patients. 83.2% complained of pain, mostly in the kidney (67.9%) or in the bladder area (31.3%), particularly during physical activity (72.9%) and micturition (77.0%). Pain interfered with everyday life in 92.2%. General health, working, and sexual activity were also affected. 62.0% of patients would be dissatisfied (51.6% unhappy or terrible) if further ureteral stenting was proposed in future. Younger patients and females were more affected. Limitations include observational design and lack of baseline evaluation.

Conclusions

Ureteral stents are responsible for significant urinary symptoms and pain after semirigid and flexible ureteroscopy. They also considerably affect general health, working and sexual activity. Urologists should consider it carefully before stenting, inform patients about stent-related symptoms, and minimize stent indwelling time.

Keywords

Lower urinary tract symptoms Pain Stents Ureteroscopy Urinary calculi 

Notes

Author contributions

AB: protocol development, data collection and management, data analysis, manuscript writing. EA, ED, DP, and SA: data collection and management. AB, PD, RP, and PG: protocol development and data analysis.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

345_2018_2376_MOESM1_ESM.doc (44 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 44 kb)
345_2018_2376_MOESM2_ESM.doc (42 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 42 kb)
345_2018_2376_MOESM3_ESM.doc (36 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOC 35 kb)
345_2018_2376_MOESM4_ESM.doc (34 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOC 34 kb)
345_2018_2376_MOESM5_ESM.doc (36 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (DOC 35 kb)
345_2018_2376_MOESM6_ESM.doc (61 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (DOC 61 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Joshi HB, Stainthorpe A, MacDonagh RP et al (2003) Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of symptoms, quality of life and utility. J Urol 169:1065–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Song T, Liao B, Zheng S et al (2012) Meta-analysis of postoperatively stenting or not in patients underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Urol Res 40:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haleblian G, Kijvikai K, De La Rosette J et al (2008) Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: a systematic review. J Urol 179:424–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nabi G, Cook J, N’Dow J et al (2007) Outcomes of stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 334:572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Auge BK, Sarvis JA, L’esperance JO et al (2007) Practice patterns of ureteral stenting after routine ureteroscopic stone surgery: a survey of practicing urologists. J Endourol 21:1287–1291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hughes B, Wiseman OJ, Thompson T et al (2014) The dilemma of post-ureteroscopy stenting. BJU Int 113:184–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stern JM, Yiee J, Park S (2007) Safety and efficacy of ureteral access sheaths. J Endourol 21:119–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schoenthaler M, Buchholz N, Farin E et al (2014) The Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS): a multicenter video-based evaluation of inter-rater reliability. World J Urol 32:1033–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schoenthaler M, Wilhelm K (2012) Postureteroscopic lesion scale: a new management modified organ injury scale—evaluation in 435 ureteroscopic patients. J Endourol 26:1425–1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Joshi HB, Newns N, Stainthorpe A et al (2003) Ureteral stent symptom questionnaire: development and validation of a multidimensional quality of life measure. J Urol 169:1060–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Giannarini G, Keeley FX, Valent F et al (2008) The Italian Linguistic Validation of the Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire. J Urol 180:624–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Puichaud A, Larré S, Bruyère F et al (2010) The French linguistic validation of the Ureteric Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ). Prog Urol 20:210–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park J, Shin DW, You C et al (2012) Cross-cultural application of the Korean version of Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire. J Endourol 26:1518–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abt D, Dotzer K, Honek P et al (2017) The German linguistic validation of the Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire (USSQ). World J Urol 35(3):443–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    El-Nahas AR, Elsaadany MM, Tharwat M et al (2014) Validation of the Arabic linguistic version of the Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire. Arab J Urol 12:290–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dellis A, Joshi HB, Timoney AG et al (2010) Relief of stent related symptoms: review of engineering and pharmacological solutions. J Urol 184:1267–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lamb AD, Vowler SL, Johnston R et al (2011) Meta-analysis showing the beneficial effect of α-blockers on ureteric stent discomfort. BJU Int 108:1894–1902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 22:55Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Richter S, Ringel A, Shalev M et al (2000) The indwelling ureteric stent: a “friendly” procedure with unfriendly high morbidity. BJU Int 85:408–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Basu S, Watson GM (2000) JJ stents cause less pain than full-blown renal colic—but only just. BJU Int 85(Suppl 5):22Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chew BH, Seitz C (2016) Impact of ureteral stenting in ureteroscopy. Curr Opin Urol 26:76–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhou L, Cai X, Li H, Wang K-J (2015) Effects of α-blockers, antimuscarinics, or combination therapy in relieving ureteral stent-related symptoms: a meta-analysis. J Endourol 29:650–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Irani J, Siquier J, Pirès C et al (1999) Symptom characteristics and the development of tolerance with time in patients with indwelling double-pigtail ureteric stents. BJU Int 84:276–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Byrne RR, Auge BK, Kourambas J et al (2002) Routine ureteral stenting is not necessary after ureteroscopy and ureteropyeloscopy: a randomized trial. J Endourol 16:9–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Djaladat H, Tajik P, Payandemehr P et al (2007) Ureteral catheterization in uncomplicated ureterolithotripsy: a randomized, controlled trial. Eur Urol 52:836–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Keeley FX, Timoney AG (2007) Routine stenting after ureteroscopy: think again. Eur Urol 52:642–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Torricelli FC, De S, Hinck B, Noble M et al (2014) Flexible ureteroscopy with a ureteral access sheath: when to stent? Urology 83:278–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tolley D (2000) Ureteric stents, far from ideal. Lancet 356:872–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69:475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della ScienzaSan Giovanni Battista Molinette University HospitalTurinItaly
  2. 2.Department of Nuclear Medicine, Città della Salute e della ScienzaSan Giovanni Battista Molinette University HospitalTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations