Advertisement

World Journal of Urology

, Volume 33, Issue 9, pp 1243–1250 | Cite as

Female stress urinary incontinence and the mid-urethral sling: Is obstruction necessary to achieve dryness?

  • Amy D. Dobberfuhl
  • Elise J. B. De
Topic Paper

Abstract

Background

Recently, the American Urogynecologic Society and Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction released position statements on the use of mid-urethral slings. The statement offers that the polypropylene mesh mid-urethral sling (retropubic and transobturator) is now the recognized worldwide standard of care for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. The purpose of the current manuscript is to examine whether the polypropylene mesh mid-urethral sling should be the standard of care.

Methods

Data for this review were acquired by a systematic search of the medical literature.

Results

The Trial of Mid-Urethral Slings found that retropubic and transobturator slings were associated with a significant rate of adverse events, despite being comprised of surgeons from high-volume, experienced centers. Stress urinary incontinence is not just a urethral disease due to intrinsic sphincteric deficiency. It can also be related to urethral hypermobility, which in turn is caused by anterior vaginal wall laxity. Often both hypermobility and intrinsic sphincter deficiency coexist. Recognizing the role of anterior vaginal wall support is important to understanding the role of procedures (such as Burch or needle suspension procedures) which have the potential of correcting stress incontinence without affecting voiding parameters.

Conclusions

As a discipline, we need to conceptualize stress incontinence due to urethral hypermobility or intrinsic sphincter deficiency as separate entities and design our procedures to restore the underlying suspected pathology.

Keywords

Female stress urinary incontinence Mid-urethral sling Bladder outlet obstruction 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in relation to the content of the manuscript.

Ethical standard

The manuscript is not a clinical study and does not contain patient data.

References

  1. 1.
    Nager C, Tulikangas P, Miller D et al (2014) Position statement on mesh midurethral slings for stress urinary incontinence. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 20:123–125. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000097 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM et al (2010) Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 362:2066–2076. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912658 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kenton K, Stoddard AM, Zyczynski H et al (2015) 5-Year longitudinal followup after retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings. J Urol 193:203–210. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.089 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DeLancey JO (1994) Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:1713–1720 (discussion 1720–1723) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Petros PE, Ulmsten UI (1990) An integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Experimental and clinical considerations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 153:7–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Petros P (2011) The integral system. Cent Eur J Urol 64:110–119. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2011.03.art1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lovegrove Jones RC, Peng Q, Stokes M et al (2010) Mechanisms of pelvic floor muscle function and the effect on the urethra during a cough. Eur Urol 57:1101–1110. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.011 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cundiff GW (2004) The pathophysiology of stress urinary incontinence: a historical perspective. Rev Urol 6:S10PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DeLancey JO (1996) Stress urinary incontinence: where are we now, where should we go? Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:311–319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Glazener CMA, Cooper K (2004) Bladder neck needle suspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003636.pub2 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lapitan MCM, Cody JD (2012) Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD002912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002912.pub5 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marshall VF, Marchetti AA, Krantz KE (1949) The correction of stress incontinence by simple vesicourethral suspension. Surg Gynecol Obstet 88:509–518PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kammerer-Doak DN, Cornella JL, Magrina JF et al (1998) Osteitis pubis after Marshall–Marchetti–Krantz urethropexy: a pubic osteomyelitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:586–590CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zimmern PE, Hadley HR, Leach GE, Raz S (1987) Female urethral obstruction after Marshall–Marchetti–Krantz operation. J Urol 138:517–520PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burch JC (1961) Urethrovaginal fixation to Cooper’s ligament for correction of stress incontinence, cystocele, and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 81:281–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pereyra AJ (1959) A simplified surgical procedure for the correction of stress incontinence in women. West J Surg Obstet Gynecol 67:223–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pereyra AJ, Lebherz TB (1967) Combined urethrovesical suspension and vaginourethroplasty for correction of urinary stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 30:537–546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raz S (1981) Modified bladder neck suspension for female stress incontinence. Urology 17:82–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stamey TA (1973) Endoscopic suspension of the vesical neck for urinary incontinence. Surg Gynecol Obstet 136:547–554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gittes RF, Loughlin KR (1987) No-incision pubovaginal suspension for stress incontinence. J Urol 138:568–570PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heaton JP, Morales A, VanCott GF, Grennell HJ (1987) Bladder neck suspension for stress incontinence as an outpatient procedure. Urol Clin North Am 14:209–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Benson JT, Agosta A, McClellan E (1990) Evaluation of a minimal-incision pubovaginal suspension as an adjunct to other pelvic-floor surgery. Obstet Gynecol 75:844–847PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stamey TA (1980) Endoscopic suspension of the vesical neck for urinary incontinence in females. Report on 203 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 192:465–471PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shah PJ, Holder PD (1989) Comparison of Stamey and Pereyra–Raz bladder neck suspensions. Br J Urol 64:481–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Raz S, Klutke CG, Golomb J (1989) Four-corner bladder and urethral suspension for moderate cystocele. J Urol 142:712–715PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kilicarslan H, Guvenal T, Ayan S et al (2003) Comparison of outcomes of three different surgical techniques performed for stress urinary incontinence. Int J Urol Off J Jpn Urol Assoc 10:126–130 (discussion 131) Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wilson TS, Zimmern PE (2005) Anterior vaginal wall suspension. In: Vasavada SP, Appell R, Sand PK, Raz S (eds) Female urology, urogynecology, and voiding dysfunction. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Coskun B, Lavelle RS, Alhalabi F et al (2014) Anterior vaginal wall suspension procedure for moderate bladder and uterine prolapse as a method of uterine preservation. J Urol 192:1461–1467. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.06.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ulmsten U, Falconer C, Johnson P et al (1998) A multicenter study of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 9:210–213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Delorme E (2001) Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog En Urol J Assoc Fr Urol Société Fr Urol 11:1306–1313Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ulmsten U, Petros P (1995) Intravaginal slingplasty (IVS): an ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol 29:75–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dietz HP, Wilson PD (2004) The “iris effect”: how two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound can help us understand anti-incontinence procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23:267–271. doi: 10.1002/uog.985 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shek KL, Chantarasorn V, Dietz HP (2010) The urethral motion profile before and after suburethral sling placement. J Urol 183:1450–1454. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Long C-Y, Hsu C-S, Lo T-S et al (2008) Ultrasonographic assessment of tape location following tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator tape procedure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87:116–121. doi: 10.1080/00016340701797765 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Murray S, Haverkorn RM, Koch YKP et al (2011) Urethral distortion after placement of synthetic mid urethral sling. J Urol 185:1321–1326. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.066 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Moore RD, Serels SR, Davila GW, Settle P (2009) Minimally invasive treatment for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI): a review including TVT, TOT, and mini-sling. Surg Technol Int 18:157–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Blaivas JG, Groutz A (2000) Bladder outlet obstruction nomogram for women with lower urinary tract symptomatology. Neurourol Urodyn 19:553–564. doi: 10.1002/1520-6777(2000)19:5<553:AID-NAU2>3.0.CO;2-B CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chassagne S, Bernier PA, Haab F et al (1998) Proposed cutoff values to define bladder outlet obstruction in women. Urology 51:408–411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lemack GE, Zimmern PE (2000) Pressure flow analysis may aid in identifying women with outflow obstruction. J Urol 163:1823–1828CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Defreitas GA, Zimmern PE, Lemack GE, Shariat SF (2004) Refining diagnosis of anatomic female bladder outlet obstruction: comparison of pressure-flow study parameters in clinically obstructed women with those of normal controls. Urology 64:675–679. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.089 (discussion 679–681) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nitti VW, Tu LM, Gitlin J (1999) Diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in women. J Urol 161:1535–1540CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jeon S, Yoo E-H (2012) Predictive value of obstructive voiding symptoms and objective bladder emptying tests for urinary retention. J Obstet Gynaecol J Inst Obstet Gynaecol 32:770–772. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2012.716105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cho S-T, Song H-C, Song H-J et al (2010) Predictors of postoperative voiding dysfunction following transobsturator sling procedures in patients with stress urinary incontinence. Int Neurourol J 14:26–33. doi: 10.5213/inj.2010.14.1.26 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Greiman A, Kielb S (2012) Revisions of mid urethral slings can be accomplished in the office. J Urol 188:190–193. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2560 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Boukerrou M, Boulanger L, Rubod C et al (2007) Study of the biomechanical properties of synthetic mesh implanted in vivo. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 134:262–267. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.02.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kraus SR, Lemack GE, Sirls LT et al (2011) Urodynamic changes associated with successful stress urinary incontinence surgery: is a little tension a good thing? Urology 78:1257–1262. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.1413 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dmochowski RR, Zimmern PE, Ganabathi K et al (1997) Role of the four-corner bladder neck suspension to correct stress incontinence with a mild to moderate cystocele. Urology 49:35–40. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00357-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Appell RA (2000) In situ vaginal wall sling. Urology 56:499–503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mikhail MS, Rosa H, Packer P et al (2004) A modified vaginal wall patch sling technique as a first-line surgical approach for genuine stress incontinence with urethral hypermobility: long-term follow up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15:132–136. doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1126-z (discussion 136–137) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Klutke JJ, Klutke CG, Bergman J, Elia G (1999) Urodynamics changes in voiding after anti-incontinence surgery: an insight into the mechanism of cure. Urology 54:1003–1007CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Leach GE, Yip CM, Donovan BJ (1987) Mechanism of continence after modified Pereyra bladder neck suspension. Prospective urodynamic study. Urology 29:328–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    DeLancey JO (1992) Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:1717–1724 (discussion 1724–1728) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Young SB, Daman JJ, Bony LG (2001) Vaginal paravaginal repair: one-year outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1360–1366. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.119073 (discussion 1366–1367) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Reid RI, You H, Luo K (2011) Site-specific prolapse surgery. I. Reliability and durability of native tissue paravaginal repair. Int Urogynecol J 22:591–599. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1347-2 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zimmern P, Christie A, Xie X-J et al (2014) Fifteen years experience with anterior vaginal wall suspension procedure, a native tissue vaginal repair for stress urinary incontinence with early stage anterior compartment prolapse. In: MP75-10 AUA 2014 annual meeting, Orlando, FLGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lo T-S, Horng S-G, Liang C-C et al (2005) Ultrasound and urodynamic comparison between caudocranial and craniocaudal tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence. Urology 66:754–758. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.04.071 (discussion 758–759) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kaplan SA, Te AE, Young GP et al (2000) Prospective analysis of 373 consecutive women with stress urinary incontinence treated with a vaginal wall sling: the Columbia-Cornell University experience. J Urol 164:1623–1627CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Chapple CR, Raz S, Brubaker L, Zimmern PE (2013) Mesh sling in an era of uncertainty: lessons learned and the way forward. Eur Urol 64:525–529. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.045 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of UrologyAlbany Medical CollegeAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations