Advertisement

World Journal of Urology

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 1551–1558 | Cite as

Long-term outcome following Thulium VapoEnucleation of the prostate

  • C. NetschEmail author
  • A. Engbert
  • T. Bach
  • A. J. Gross
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

To evaluate Thulium VapoEnucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) for patients with symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) with long-term follow-up.

Methods

A prospective analysis of 124 patients who underwent ThuVEP between January 2007 and July 2008 at our institution was done. ThuVEP was carried out using the 70-Watt 2-μm continuous wave Tm:YAG laser. Patient demographic, perioperative complications, and follow-up data were analysed.

Results

The median (interquartile range) preoperative prostate volume was 58.5 (45–70.75) cc. The median operation and enucleation time were 74 (60–100) and 32.54 (25.62–37.52) min, respectively. The median catheter time and postoperative hospital stay were 2 (2–2) and 4 (3–5) days, respectively. Nine (7.3 %) patients required a second-look operation in the immediate postoperative course (failed morcellation = 2, clot retention = 3, and residual adenoma = 4). Two patients needed blood transfusions (1.6 %) postoperatively. At 12-month follow-up, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), and postvoiding residual urine (PVR) improved significantly in comparison with preoperative assessment (p < 0.001). A significant decrease of median PSA (4.7 vs. 0.92 μg/l) was seen at one-year follow-up (p < 0.001). At the 48-month follow-up mark, Qmax, PVR, IPSS, and QoL still differed significantly from baseline (p < 0.001). Bladder neck contractures and urethral strictures each developed in 1.6 and 0.8 % of the patients during follow-up. None of the patients were re-treated during follow-up for recurrent prostatic tissue.

Conclusions

ThuVEP is a safe, efficacious, and durable procedure for the treatment of BPO. The incidence of late complications with ThuVEP was low.

Keywords

BPO Vapoenucleation Tm:YAG Revolix ThuVEP Laser surgery 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Ethical standard

All patients were treated after obtaining informed consent, following institutional review board approval.

References

  1. 1.
    Gratzke C, Schlenker B, Seitz M, Karl A, Hermanek P, Lack N, Stief CG, Reich O (2007) Complications and early postoperative outcome after open prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: results of a prospective multicenter study. J Urol 177:1419–1422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reich O, Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Seitz M, Schlenker B, Hermanek P, Lack N, Stief CG; Urology Section of the Bavarian Working Group for Quality Assurance (2008) Morbidity, mortality and early outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective multicenter evaluation of 10,654 patients. J Urol 180:246–249Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahyai SA, Gilling P, Kaplan SA, Kuntz RM, Madersbacher S, Montorsi F, Speakman MJ, Stief CG (2010) Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol 58:384–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gilling PJ, Wilson LC, King CJ, Westenberg AM, Frampton CM, Fraundorfer MR (2012) Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: results at 7 years. BJU Int. 109:408–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Madersbacher S, Lackner J, Brössner C, Röhlich M, Stancik I, Willinger M, Schatzl G; Prostate Study Group of the Austrian Society of Urology (2005) Reoperation, myocardial infarction and mortality after transurethral and open prostatectomy: a nation-wide, long-term analysis of 23,123 cases. Eur Urol 47:499–504Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elzayat EA, Habib EI, Elhilali MM (2005) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a size-independent new “gold standard”. Urology. 66:108–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elzayat EA, Elhilali MM (2006) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): the endourologic alternative to open prostatectomy. Eur Urol 49:87–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elzayat EA, Elhilali MM (2007) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): long-term results, reoperation rate, and possible impact of the learning curve. Eur Urol 52:1465–1470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahyai SA, Lehrich K, Kuntz RM (2007) Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 3-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol 52:1456–1463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kuntz RM, Lehrich K, Ahyai SA (2008) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 53:160–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gilling PJ, Aho TF, Frampton CM, King CJ, Fraunhofer MR (2008) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: results at 6 years. Eur Urol 53:744–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vavassori I, Valenti S, Naspro R, Vismara A, Dell’Acqua V, Manzetti A, Hurle R (2008) Three-year outcome following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate combined with mechanical morcellation in 330 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 53:599–604PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krambeck AE, Handa SE, Lingeman JE (2010) Experience with more than 1,000 holmium laser prostate enucleations for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 183:1105–1109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elmansy HM, Kotb A, Elhilali MM (2011) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: long-term durability of clinical outcomes and complication rates during 10 years of follow-up. J Urol 186:1972–1976PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bach T, Netsch C, Haecker A, Michel MS, Herrmann TR, Gross AJ (2010) Thulium:YAG laser enucleation (VapoEnucleation) of the prostate: safety and durability during intermediate-term follow-up. World J Urol 28:39–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bach T, Netsch C, Pohlmann L, Herrmann TR, Gross AJ (2011) Thulium:YAG vapoenucleation in large volume prostates. J Urol 186:2323–2327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gross AJ, Netsch C, Knipper S, Hölzel J, Bach T (2014) Complications and early postoperative outcome in 1080 patients after thulium vapoenucleation of the prostate: results at a single institution. Eur Urol 63:859–867 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mamoulakis C, Efthimiou I, Kazoulis S, Christoulakis I, Sofras F (2011) The modified Clavien classification system: a standardized platform for reporting complications in transurethral resection of the prostate. World J Urol 29:205–210PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Netsch C, Bach T, Herrmann TR, Neubauer O, Gross AJ (2013) Evaluation of the learning curve for Thulium VapoEnucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) using a mentor-based approach. World J Urol 31:1231–1238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Malek RS, Kuntzman RS, Barrett DM (2005) Photoselective potassiumtitanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the benign obstructive prostate: observations on long-term outcomes. J Urol 174:1344–1348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Te AE, Malloy TR, Stein BS, Stein BS, Ulchaker JC, Nseyo UO, Hai MA (2006) Impact of prostate-specific antigen level and prostate volume as predictors of efficacy in photoselective vaporization prostatectomy: analysis and results of an ongoing prospective multicentre study at 3 years. BJU Int. 97:1229–1233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ruszat R, Seitz M, Wyler SF, Abe C, Rieken M, Reich O, Gasser TC, Bachmann A (2008) GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate: single-center experience and long-term results after 500 procedures. Eur Urol 54:893–901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hai M (2009) Photoselective vaporization of prostate: five-year outcomes of entire clinic patient population. Urology 73:807–810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Al-Ansari A, Younes N, Sampige VP, Al-Rumaihi K, Ghafouri A, Gul T, Shokeir AA (2010) GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with midterm follow-up. Eur Urol 58:349–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Elmansy HM, Elzayat E, Elhilali MM (2010) Holmium laser ablation versus photoselective vaporization of prostate less than 60 cc: long-term results of a randomized trial. J Urol 184:2023–2028PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Elshal AM, Elmansy HM, Elhilali MM (2013) Two laser ablation techniques for a prostate less than 60 ml: lessons learned 70 months after a randomized controlled trial. Urology. 82:416–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Malde S, Rajagopalan A, Patel N, Simoes A, Choi W, Shrotri N (2012) Potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser photoselective vaporization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: 5-year follow-up from a district general hospital. J Endourol 26:878–883PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mattiasson A, Wagrell L, Schelin S, Nordling J, Richthoff J, Magnusson B, Schain M, Larson T, Boyle E, Duelund-Jacobsen J, Kroyer K, Ageheim H (2007) Five-year follow-up of feedback microwave thermotherapy versus TURP for clinical BPH: a prospective randomized multicenter study. Urology. 69:91–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Autorino R, Damiano R, Di Lorenzo G, Quarto G, Perdonà S, D’Armiento M, De Sio M (2009) Four-year outcome of a prospective randomised trial comparing bipolar plasmakinetic and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. Eur Urol 55:922–929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Varkarakis I, Kyriakakis Z, Delis A, Protogerou V, Deliveliotis C (2004) Long-term results of open transvesical prostatectomy from a contemporary series of patients. Urology. 64:306–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyAsklepios Hospital BarmbekHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of UrologyAsklepios Hospital HarburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations