World Journal of Urology

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 1087–1092 | Cite as

Epidemiological gender-specific aspects in urolithiasis

Topic Paper



The incidence of urolithiasis is worldwide increasing and contributes to a rising economic and health care burden. The objective of this review is to identify gender differences in urolithiasis epidemiology in Europe and the USA as well as gender-specific risk factors for urolithiasis.

Evidence acquisition

A systematic review of the present literature was performed including English journals without a time limit. The MeSH terms used were as follows: (“Sex Characteristics”[Mesh]) AND “Urolithiasis”[Mesh] or (“Epidemiology”[Mesh]) AND “Urolithiasis”[Mesh]. Additionally, reference search of retrieved papers identified additional references. The MEDLINE database was searched.

Evidence synthesis

The prevalence of urolithiasis is rising worldwide including both genders in different age groups. Especially women face an increase in prevalence in the USA. Overweight seems to be an important cause for this development. Additionally insulin resistance and hypertonia, conditions present in the metabolic syndrome complex, contribute to this phenomenon.


Stone prevalence across all age groups and both genders is increasing. Lifestyle changes along with increasing prevalence of obesity are key factors for this development. Female gender did significantly differ in the risk ratio of stone development in different variables including body mass index, hyperinsulinemia, and hypertension. It is important to inform the public on measures how to change lifestyle and dietary measures for preventing or lowering events of stone disease.


Gender Urolithiasis Epidemiology Obesity Diabetes mellitus 


  1. 1.
    Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC (2005) Diabetes mellitus and the risk of nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int 68(3):1230–1235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shekarriz B, Stoller ML (2002) Uric acid nephrolithiasis: current concepts and controversies. J Urol 168(4 Pt 1):1307–1314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hesse A et al (2003) Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000. Eur Urol 44(6):709–713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asper R (1984) Epidemiology and socioeconomic aspects of urolithiasis. Urol Res 12(1):1–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Trinchieri A et al (2000) Increase in the prevalence of symptomatic upper urinary tract stones during the last ten years. Eur Urol 37(1):23–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stamatelou KK et al (2003) Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976–1994. Kidney Int 63(5):1817–1823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lieske JC et al (2006) Renal stone epidemiology in Rochester, Minnesota: an update. Kidney Int 69(4):760–764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strope SA, Wolf Jr JS, Hollenbeck BK (2010) Changes in gender distribution of urinary stone disease. Urology 75(3):543–546.e1Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daudon M et al (2004) Changes in stone composition according to age and gender of patients: a multivariate epidemiological approach. Urol Res 32(3):241–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knoll T et al (2011) Urolithiasis through the ages: data on more than 200,000 urinary stone analyses. J Urol 185(4):1304–1311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Soucie JM et al (1994) Demographic and geographic variability of kidney stones in the United States. Kidney Int 46(3):893–899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pearle MS, Calhoun EA, Curhan GC (2005) Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis. J Urol 173(3):848–857PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hiatt RA et al (1982) Frequency of urolithiasis in a prepaid medical care program. Am J Epidemiol 115(2):255–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scales CD Jr et al (2007) Changing gender prevalence of stone disease. J Urol 177(3):979–982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scales CD (ed) (2013) Epidemiology of stone disease. In: Knoll T, Pearle M (eds) Clinical management of urolithiasis. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Perucca J et al (2007) Sex difference in urine concentration across differing ages, sodium intake, and level of kidney disease. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 292(2):R700–R705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hadj-Aissa A et al (1992) Influence of the level of hydration on the renal response to a protein meal. Kidney Int 42(5):1207–1216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ebner A, Manz F (2002) Sex difference of urinary osmolality in German children. Am J Nephrol 22(4):352–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hercberg S et al (2004) The SU.VI.MAX Study: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the health effects of antioxidant vitamins and minerals. Arch Intern Med 164(21):2335–2342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sacks FM et al (2001) Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med 344(1):3–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sarada B, Satyanarayana U (1991) Urinary composition in men and women and the risk of urolithiasis. Clin Biochem 24(6):487–490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Parks JH, Barsky R, Coe FL (2003) Gender differences in seasonal variation of urine stone risk factors. J Urol 170(2 Pt 1):384–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang YX et al (1995) Estradiol attenuates the antidiuretic action of vasopressin in ovariectomized rats. Am J Physiol 268(4 Pt 2):R951–R957PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang YX et al (1996) Sex difference in urinary concentrating ability of rats with water deprivation. Am J Physiol 270(3 Pt 2):R550–R555PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Novak TE et al (2009) Sex prevalence of pediatric kidney stone disease in the United States: an epidemiologic investigation. Urology 74(1):104–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Trinchieri A et al (1996) Clinical observations on 2086 patients with upper urinary tract stone. Arch Ital Urol Androl 68(4):251–262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marickar YM, Vijay A (2009) Female stone disease: the changing trend. Urol Res 37(6):337–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Preminger GM et al (2005) Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 173(6):1991–2000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Andreassen KPA, Olsen PR, Aabeck J, Osther PJ (2007) Classification of urolithiasis in Denmark: a national survey. Eur Urol Meet 2(1):126Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Siener R et al (2003) Prospective study on the efficacy of a selective treatment and risk factors for relapse in recurrent calcium oxalate stone patients. Eur Urol 44(4):467–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ahlstrand C, Tiselius HG (1990) Recurrences during a 10-year follow-up after first renal stone episode. Urol Res 18(6):397–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sarica K et al (2009) Role of overweight status on stone-forming risk factors in children: a prospective study. Urology 73(5):1003–1007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Negri AL et al (2008) Role of overweight and obesity on the urinary excretion of promoters and inhibitors of stone formation in stone formers. Urol Res 36(6):303–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Taylor EN, Curhan GC (2006) Body size and 24-hour urine composition. Am J Kidney Dis 48(6):905–915PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC (2005) Obesity, weight gain, and the risk of kidney stones. JAMA 293(4):455–462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nowfar S et al (2011) The relationship of obesity and gender prevalence changes in United States inpatient nephrolithiasis. Urology 78(5):1029–1033PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gillen DL, Coe FL, Worcester EM (2005) Nephrolithiasis and increased blood pressure among females with high body mass index. Am J Kidney Dis 46(2):263–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Semins MJ et al (2010) The association of increasing body mass index and kidney stone disease. J Urol 183(2):571–575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Duffey BG et al (2008) Lithogenic risk factors in the morbidly obese population. J Urol 179(4):1401–1406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Powell CR et al (2000) Impact of body weight on urinary electrolytes in urinary stone formers. Urology 55(6):825–830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Daudon M, Lacour B, Jungers P (2005) High prevalence of uric acid calculi in diabetic stone formers. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20(2):468–469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Curhan GC et al (1993) A prospective study of dietary calcium and other nutrients and the risk of symptomatic kidney stones. N Engl J Med 328(12):833–838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Curhan GC et al (1997) Comparison of dietary calcium with supplemental calcium and other nutrients as factors affecting the risk for kidney stones in women. Ann Intern Med 126(7):497–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Curhan GC et al (2004) Dietary factors and the risk of incident kidney stones in younger women: Nurses’ Health Study II. Arch Intern Med 164(8):885–891PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Borghi L et al (2002) Comparison of two diets for the prevention of recurrent stones in idiopathic hypercalciuria. N Engl J Med 346(2):77–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Taylor EN, Curhan GC (2013) Dietary calcium from dairy and non-dairy sources and risk of symptomatic kidney stones. J Urol. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.074

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urology, Vienna General HospitalMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations