Open versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicenter comparison study of perioperative results and complications
- 671 Downloads
To compare surgical results, morbidity and positive surgical margins rate of patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) versus open partial nephrectomy (OPN).
This is an observational multicenter study promoted by the “Associazione GIovani Laparoscopisti Endoscopisti” (AGILE) no-Profit Foundation, which involved six Italian urologic centers. All clinical, surgical, and pathological variables of patients treated with OPN or RPN for renal tumors were gathered in a prospectively maintained database. Tumor nephrometry was measured with PADUA score, and complications were stratified with modified Clavien system. Differences between RPN and OPN group were assessed with univariate analysis. Perioperative variables independently associated with complications were assessed with multivariate analysis.
A total of 198 and 105 patients were enrolled in OPN and RPN group, respectively. Both had similar demographics, indications to surgery, tumor nephrometry, renal function, WIT (18.7 vs. 18.2 min; p = NS), positive margin rate (5.6 vs. 5.7 %; p = NS), intraoperative complications, and postoperative medical complications. Compared to OPN, RPN group was significantly more morbid (p = 0.04), included tumors with smaller size (p = 0.002), had longer operative time (p < 0.001), lower blood loss, surgical postoperative complications (5.7 vs. 21.2 %, p < 0.001), Clavien 3–4 surgical complications (1 vs. 9.1 %, p = 0.001), and shorter hospitalization. The surgical approach resulted independently correlated with surgical complications on multivariate analysis.
In the present series, RPN was associated with a significant reduction of blood loss, surgical complications, including the reintervention rate for urinary fistula and postoperative bleeding, and with a shorter hospitalization.
KeywordsKidney tumor Partial nephrectomy Robotics Complications
- I postop./III postop.
First/third postoperative day
American Society of Anaesthesiologists
Body mass index
Estimated blood loss (during surgery)
Eastern cooperative oncology group
Length of hospital stay
Open partial nephrectomy
Positive surgical margins
Robotic partial nephrectomy
Renal cell carcinoma
Urinary collecting system
Warm ischemia time
Conflict of interest
- 1.Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC et al. (2010) European association of urology guideline group. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol 58(3):398–406. Epub 2010 Jul 12. PubMed PMID: 20633979Google Scholar
- 2.Novick AC, Campbell SC, Belldegrun A et al: Guideline for management of the clinical stage 1 renal mass. Available at www.auanet.org/content/ media/renalmass09.pdf?CFID 1666475&CFTOKEN 79651347&jsessionid 8430e85e87e2ad1bac0325294 a7325226072. Accessed 1 Aug 2010
- 3.Antonelli A, Ficarra V, Bertini R et al (2012) Members of the SATURN Project—LUNA Foundation. Elective partial nephrectomy is equivalent to radical nephrectomy in patients with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma: results of a retrospective, comparative, multi-institutional study. BJU Int 109(7):1013–1018PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Khalifeh A, Autorino R, Hillyer SP et al. (2013) Comparative outcomes and assessment of “Trifecta” in 500 robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomies: a single surgeon experience. J Urol 189(4):1236–1242 Google Scholar
- 8.Pierorazio PM, Patel HD, Feng T, et al. (2011) Robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes and evaluation of learning curve. Urology 78(4):813–819. Epub 2011 Jul 29Google Scholar
- 11.Lee S, Oh J, Hong SK, et al. (2011) Open versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: effect on clinical outcome. J Endourol 25(7):1181–1185. Epub 2011 Jun 9Google Scholar
- 15.Greene FL, Gospodarowicz M, Wittekend C et al (2009) American joint committee on cancer (AJCC) staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 17.Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI et al (2004) Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. World health organization classification of tumours. IARC Press, LyonGoogle Scholar
- 21.Rogers CG, Patard JJ (2009) Rebuttal 2 open to debate. The motion: robotic partial nephrectomy is better than open partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 56(3):568–570. Epub 2009 Jun 24Google Scholar