World Journal of Urology

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 413–418

Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after more than 5 years

  • Michele Billia
  • Oussama Elhage
  • Benjamin Challacombe
  • Declan Cahill
  • Rick Popert
  • Kathy Holmes
  • Roger Sinclair Kirby
  • Prokar Dasgupta
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

In the last 10 years, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become increasingly popular as witnessed by an increased number of publications. However, there is still little known about the long-term oncologic outcomes of this technique. The aim of this study is to assess the oncologic outcomes of patients who underwent RARP at least 5 years ago, with an emphasis on biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS).

Materials and methods

In 2004, RARP was introduced at our institutions. Records of all patients having RARP were prospectively collected in a dedicated database as part of the NUVOLA-BAUS project. For the present study, we selected only patients who had a follow-up of at least 5 years. Endpoints were BCRFS rate and 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results

Overall, we identified 175 patients; 61.7 % of patients had Gleason 7–9 disease and 26.9 % had pT ≥ 3 disease at final pathology. Eight patients (4.5 %) had biochemical recurrence at follow-up. Overall 5-year BCRFS rate was 95.4 %, while it was 97.6, 91 and 50 % in pT2, pT3 and pT4 diseases, respectively. Among the patients who recurred, the mean time to recurrence was 22.1 ± 8.8 months. These patients received salvage external beam radiation treatment combined with hormonal therapy (anti-androgen + LHRH analogue) or hormonal therapy alone. 5-year CSS was 98.3 % (172/175): in 2 cases, the specimen showed pT4 cancer, while lymph node metastasis was noted in one case.

Conclusion

The 5-year BCRFS and CSS after RARP are encouraging even in a population with significant high-risk disease

Keywords

Prostate cancer Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy Long-term oncological outcomes Biochemical relapse-free survival 

References

  1. 1.
    UK CR. Prostate cancer incidence statistics [Internet]. Cancer Research UK. Available from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/types/prostate/incidence/uk-prostate-cancer-incidence-statistics. [cited 2013 Feb 25]
  2. 2.
    Roehl K, Han M, Ramos CG, Antenor JAV, Catalona WJ (2004) Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results. J Urol [Internet] 172(3):910–914. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15310996. [cited 2013 Feb 14]Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Sarle R, Hemal A, Peabody JO, et al. (2002) Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol [Internet] 168(3):945–949. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12187196. [cited 2013 Feb 25]
  4. 4.
    American Joint Committee on Cancer [Internet]. Available from: http://www.cancerstaging.org/. [cited 2013 Feb 25]
  5. 5.
    D’Amico a V, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Blank K, Broderick G a, et al. (1998) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA [Internet] 280(11):969–974. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9749478. [cited 2013 Feb 25]
  6. 6.
    Clavien P, Barkun J, De Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg [Internet] 50(2):187–196. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19638912. [cited 2013 Feb 28]Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh I, Hemal AK (2010) Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in 2010. Expert review of anticancer therapy [Internet]. Expert Reviews Ltd London, UK, 10(5):671–682. Available from: http://www.expert-reviews.com/doi/abs/10.1586/era.10.35?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub=pubmed. [cited 2013 Feb 25]
  8. 8.
    Ahmed K, Ibrahim A, Wang TT, Khan N, Challacombe B, Khan MS, et al. (2012) Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery—a systematic review. BJU Int [Internet]. 110(10):1544–1556. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22443296. [cited 2013 Feb 1]
  9. 9.
    Cáceres F, Sánchez C, Martínez-piñeiro L, Tabernero A, Alonso S, Manuel P, et al. (2007) PROSTATECTOMÍA RADICAL LAPAROSCÓPICA VERSUS ROBÓTICA. Correspondencia Luis Martínez-Piñeiro Servicio de Urología Hospital General La Paz Paseo Castellana, 261. 4:430–438Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, et al. (2009) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol [Internet] 55(5):1037–1063. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19185977. [cited 2013 Feb 25]
  11. 11.
    Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, Aragona M, Artibani W (2007) Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol [Internet] 51(1):45–55. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16854519. [cited 2013 Feb 25]. Discussion 56Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, Badani KK, Fumo M, Bhandari M, et al. (2007) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol [Internet] 51(3):648–657. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17097214. [cited 2013 Feb 25]. Discussion 657–8
  13. 13.
    Badani KK, Kaul S, Menon M (2007) Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer [Internet] 110(9):1951–1958. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17893904. [cited 2013 Feb 25]
  14. 14.
    Murphy DG, Kerger M, Crowe H, Peters JS, Costello AJ (2009) Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Eur Urol [Internet] 55(6):1358–1366. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19147274. [cited 2013 Feb 25]
  15. 15.
    Menon M, Bhandari M, Gupta N, Lane Z, Peabody JO, Rogers CG, et al. (2010) Biochemical recurrence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up. European urology [Internet]. Eur Assoc Urol 58(6):838–846. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20869162. [cited 2013 Feb 14]
  16. 16.
    Suardi N, Ficarra V, Willemsen P, De Wil P, Gallina A, De Naeyer G, et al. (2012) Long-term biochemical recurrence rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of a single-center series of patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Urology [Internet] 79(1):133–138, Elsevier. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22088567. [cited 2013 Feb 25]
  17. 17.
    Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Myers RP, Blute ML, et al. (2009) Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int [Internet] 103(4):448–453. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18778350. [cited 2013 Feb 25]
  18. 18.
    Drouin SJ, Vaessen C, Hupertan V, Comperat E, Misraï V, Haertig A, et al. (2009) Comparison of mid-term carcinologic control obtained after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. World J Urol [Internet] 27(5):599–605. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19421755. [cited 2013 Feb 25]
  19. 19.
    Barocas D, Salem S, Kordan Y, Herrell SD, Chang SS, Clark PE, et al. (2010) Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. The Journal of urology [Internet], Elsevier, 183(3):990–996. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20083261. [cited 2013 Feb 25]
  20. 20.
    Magheli A, Gonzalgo ML, Su L-M, Guzzo TJ, Netto G, Humphreys EB, et al. (2011) Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching. BJU Int [Internet]. 107(12):1956–62. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3105164&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. [cited 2013 Feb 25]

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michele Billia
    • 1
    • 2
  • Oussama Elhage
    • 1
    • 2
  • Benjamin Challacombe
    • 1
    • 2
  • Declan Cahill
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rick Popert
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kathy Holmes
    • 3
  • Roger Sinclair Kirby
    • 3
  • Prokar Dasgupta
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of UrologyGuy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
  2. 2.MRC Centre for Transplantation, NIHR Biomedical Research CentreKing’s College London, King’s Health PartnersLondonUK
  3. 3.The Prostate CentreLondonUK

Personalised recommendations