d-mannose powder for prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infections in women: a randomized clinical trial
- 5k Downloads
To test whether d-mannose powder is effective for recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) prevention.
Materials and methods
After initial antibiotic treatment of acute cystitis, 308 women with history of recurrent UTI and no other significant comorbidities were randomly allocated to three groups. The first group (n = 103) received prophylaxis with 2 g of d-mannose powder in 200 ml of water daily for 6 months, the second (n = 103) received 50 mg Nitrofurantoin daily, and the third (n = 102) did not receive prophylaxis.
Overall 98 patients (31.8 %) had recurrent UTI: 15 (14.6) in the d-mannose group, 21 (20.4) in Nitrofurantoin group, and 62 (60.8) in no prophylaxis group, with the rate significantly higher in no prophylaxis group compared to active groups (P < 0.001). Patients in d-mannose group and Nitrofurantoin group had a significantly lower risk of recurrent UTI episode during prophylactic therapy compared to patients in no prophylaxis group (RR 0.239 and 0.335, P < 0.0001). In active groups, 17.9 % of patients reported side effects but they were mild and did not require stopping the prophylaxis. Patients in d-mannose group had a significantly lower risk of side effects compared to patients in Nitrofurantoin group (RR 0.276, P < 0.0001), but the clinical importance of this finding is low because Nitrofurantoin was well tolerated.
In our study, d-mannose powder had significantly reduced the risk of recurrent UTI which was no different than in Nitrofurantoin group. More studies will be needed to validate the results of this study, but initial findings show that d-mannose may be useful for UTI prevention.
KeywordsUrinary tract infection Recurrent Cystitis d-mannose Prophylaxis
Conflict of interest
All authors state that they have no conflict of interest.
- 8.Zhanel GG, Hisanaga TL, Laing NM, DeCorby MR, Nichol KA, Palatnik LP, Johnson J, Noreddin A, Harding GK, Nicolle LE, Hoban DJ (2005) Antibiotic resistance in outpatient urinary isolates: final results from the North American urinary tract infection Collaborative Alliance (NAUTICA). Int J Antimicrob Agents 26:380–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Bouckaert J, Berglund J, Schembri M, De Genst E, Cools L, Wuhrer M, Hung CS, Pinkner J, Slättegård R, Zavialov A, Choudhury D, Langermann S, Hultgren SJ, Wyns L, Klemm P, Oscarson S, Knight SD, De Greve H (2005) Receptor binding studies disclose a novel class of high-affinity inhibitors of the Escherichia coli FimH adhesin. Mol Microbiol 55:441–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Milo G, Katchman EA, Paul M, Christiaens T, Baerheim A, Leibovici L (2005) Duration of antibacterial treatment for uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:CD004682Google Scholar