World Journal of Urology

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 471–480

Functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy using athermal, traction free risk-stratified grades of nerve sparing

  • Ashutosh K. Tewari
  • Adnan Ali
  • Sheela Metgud
  • Nithin Theckumparampil
  • Abhishek Srivastava
  • Francesca Khani
  • Brian D. Robinson
  • Naveen Gumpeni
  • Maria M. Shevchuk
  • Matthieu Durand
  • Prasanna Sooriakumaran
  • Jinyi Li
  • Robert Leung
  • Alexandra Peyser
  • Siobhan Gruschow
  • Vinita Asija
  • Niyati Harneja
Topic Paper

Abstract

Objective

To report our unique approach for individualizing robotic prostate cancer surgery by risk stratification and sub classification of the periprostatic space into 4 distinct compartments, and thus performing 4 precise different grades of nerve sparing based on neurosurgical principles and to present updated potency and continence outcomes data of patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) using our risk-stratified approach based on layers of periprostatic fascial dissection.

Patients and methods

(1) Between January 2005 and December 2010, 2,536 men underwent RALP by a single surgeon at our institution. (2) Included patients were those with ≥1-year follow-up and were preoperatively continent and potent, defined as having a SHIM questionnaire score of >21; thus, the final number of patient in the study cohort was 1,335. (3) Postoperative potency was defined as the ability to have successful intercourse (score of ≥4 on question 2 of the SHIM); continence was defined as the use of no pads per 24 h.

Results

(1) The potency and continence for NS grades 1, 2, 3, and 4 were found to be 90.6, 76.2, 60.5, and 57.1 % (P < 0.001) and 98, 93.2, 90.1, and 88.9 % (P < 0.001), respectively. (2) The overall PSM rates for patients with NS grades 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 10.5, 7, 5.8, and 4.8 %, respectively (P = 0.064).

Conclusions

The study found a correlation between risk-stratified grades of NS technique and continence and potency. Patients with lesser grades of NS had higher rates of potency and continence.

Keywords

Prostate cancer Nerve sparing Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Continence Potency 

References

  1. 1.
    Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61(2):69–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Walsh PC, Donker PJ (1982) Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 128(3):492–497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M, Ravi P, Ghani KR, Bianchi M, Jeong W, Shariat SF, Hansen J, Schmitges J, Jeldres C, Rogers CG, Peabody JO, Montorsi F, Menon M, Karakiewicz PI (2012) Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol 61(4):679–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, Sandler HM, Northouse L, Hembroff L, Lin X, Greenfield TK, Litwin MS, Saigal CS, Mahadevan A, Klein E, Kibel A, Pisters LL, Kuban D, Kibel A, Kaplan I, Wood D, Ciezki J, Shah N, Wei JT (2008) Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 358(12):1250–1261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tewari A, Peabody JO, Fischer M et al (2003) An operative and anatomic study to help in nerve sparing during laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 43:444–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Costello AJ, Brooks M, Cole OJ (2004) Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. BJU Int 94:1071–1076PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tewari AK, Srivastava A, Huang MW, Robinson BD, Shevchuk MM, Durand M, Sooriakumaran P, Grover S, Yadav R, Mishra N, Mohan S, Brooks DC, Shaikh N, Khanna A, Leung R (2011) Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). BJU Int 108(6 Pt 2):984–992. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10565.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Srivastava A, Chopra S, Pham A, Sooriakumaran P, Durand M, Chughtai B, Gruschow S, Peyser A, Harneja N, Leung R, Lee R, Herman M, Robinson B, Shevchuk M, Tewari A (2012) Effect of a risk-stratified grade of nerve-sparing technique on early return of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.009. ISSN 0302-2838. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283812008147
  9. 9.
    Rabbani F, Stapleton AM, Kattan MW, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT (2000) Factors predicting recovery of erections after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 164:1929–1934PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kundu SD, Roehl KA, Eggener SE, Antenor JA, Han M, Catalon WJ (2004) Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 172:2227–2231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Michl UH, Friedrich MG, Graefen M, Haese A, Heinzer H, Huland H (2006) Prediction of postoperative sexual function after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 176:227–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sandhu JS, Eastham JA (2010) Factors predicting early return of continence after radical prostatectomy. Curr Urol Rep 11:191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P et al (2006) Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubicprostatectomy. J Urol 175:2201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nguyen L, Jhaveri J, Tewari A (2008) Surgical technique to overcome anatomical shortcoming: balancing post-prostatectomy continence outcomes of urethral sphincter lengths on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 179(5):1907–1911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chien GW, Mikhail AA, Orvieto MA, Zagaja GP, Sokoloff MH, Brendler CB, Shalhav AL (2005) Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation. Urology 66(2):419–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Walsh PC, Lepor H, Eggleston JC (1983) Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate 4:473–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tewari A, Takenaka A, Mtui E et al (2006) The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri-zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve-sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int 98:314–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, Badani KK, Fumo M, Bhandari M, Peabody JO (2007) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 51(3):648–657 discussion 657–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shikanov S, Desai V, Razmaria A, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL (2010) Robotic radical prostatectomy for elderly patients: probability of achieving continence and potency 1 year after surgery. J Urol 183(5):1803–1807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Borin J (2006) Impact of cautery versus cautery-free preservation of neurovascular bundles on early return of potency. J Endourol 20(8):586–589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kiyoshima K, Yokomizo A, Yoshida T, Tomita K, Yonemasu H, Nakamura M, Oda Y, Naito S, Hasegawa Y (2004) Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: a histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. Jpn J ClinOncol 34(8):463–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eichelberg C, Erbersdobler A, Michl U, Schlomm T, Salomon G, Graefen M, Huland H (2007) Nerve distribution along the prostatic capsule. Eur Urol 51(1):105–110 discussion 110–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Alsaid B, Bessede T, Diallo D, Moszkowicz D, Karam I, Benoit G, Droupy S (2011) Division of autonomic nerves within the neurovascular bundles distally into corpora cavernosa and corpus spongiosum components: immunohistochemical confirmation with three-dimensional reconstruction. Eur Urol 59(6):902–909PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jhaveri JK, Chhabra P, Te AE, Takenaka A, Tu J, Yadav R, Rao S, Leung RA, Salamanca J, Bartsch G, Menon M, Darracott Vaughan E, Tewari AK (2008) Grades of robotic nerve sparing. J Urol 179(4 Suppl):488–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rao S, Tu JJ, Jhaveri JK, Yadav R, Leung RA, Martinez-Salamanca JI, Takenaka A, Te AE, Bartsch Georg, Darracott Vaughan E, Tewari AK (2008) Distributions of peri-prostatic nerves in the fascial planes around the prostate—implications for technique of nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 179(4 Suppl):228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ramanathan R, Shih G, Yang XJ, JJ Tu, Mandhani A, Rao S, Darracott Vaughan E, Tewari AK (2008) MRI based classification of variations in neurovascular structures around the seminal vesicles: implication for a modified seminal vesicle dissection technique during robotic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 179(4 Suppl):611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dev H, Rickman D, Sooriakumaran P, Srivastava A, Grover S, Leung R, Kim R, Kitabayashi N, Esqueva R, Park K, Padilla J, Rubin M, Tewari A (2011) Biobanking after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a quality assessment of providing prostate tissue for RNA studies. J Transl Med 9:121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tewari A, Srivastava A, Sooriakumaran P, Grover S, Dorsey P, Leung R (2011) Technique of traction-free nerve-sparing robotic prostatectomy: delicate tissue handling by real-time penile oxygen monitoring. Int J Impot ResGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Srivastava A, Grover S, Sooriakumaran P, Tan G, Takenaka A, Tewari AK (2011) Neuroanatomic basis for traction-free preservation of the neural hammock during athermal robotic radical prostatectomy. Curr Opin Urol 21(1):49–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Menon M, Shrivastava A, Bhandari M, Satyanarayana R, Siva S, Agarwal PK (2009) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technical modifications in 2009. Eur Urol 56(1):89–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel V, Rassweiler J, Van Poppel H (2009) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 55(5):1037–1063PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Novara G, Ficarra V, D’elia C, Secco S, Cioffi A, Cavalleri S, Artibani W (2010) Evaluating urinary continence and preoperative predictors of urinary continence after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 184(3):1028–1033PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pick DL, Osann K, Skarecky D, Narula N, Finley DS, Ahlering TE (2011) The impact of cavernosal nerve preservation on continence after robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 108(9):1492–1496. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10015.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Burkhard FC, Kessler TM, Fleischmann A, Thalmann GN, Schumacher M, Studer UE (2006) Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy—does it have an impact on urinary continence? J Urol 176(1):189–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tewari A, Jhaveri J, Rao S, Yadav R, Bartsch G, Te A, Ioffe E, Pineda M, Mudaliar S, Nguyen L, Libertino J, Vaughan D (2008) Total reconstruction of the vesico-urethral junction. BJU Int 101(7):871–877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mottrie A, Gallina A, De Wil P, Thüer D, Novara G, Ficarra V (2011) Balancing continence function and oncological outcomes during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). BJU Int 108(6 pt 2):999–1006. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10529.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashutosh K. Tewari
    • 1
  • Adnan Ali
    • 1
  • Sheela Metgud
    • 1
  • Nithin Theckumparampil
    • 1
  • Abhishek Srivastava
    • 1
  • Francesca Khani
    • 2
  • Brian D. Robinson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Naveen Gumpeni
    • 3
  • Maria M. Shevchuk
    • 2
  • Matthieu Durand
    • 1
  • Prasanna Sooriakumaran
    • 1
  • Jinyi Li
    • 1
  • Robert Leung
    • 1
  • Alexandra Peyser
    • 1
  • Siobhan Gruschow
    • 1
  • Vinita Asija
    • 1
  • Niyati Harneja
    • 1
  1. 1.LeFrak Institute of Robotic Surgery, Centre for Prostate Cancer Research and Clinical Care, Department of UrologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations