Functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy using athermal, traction free risk-stratified grades of nerve sparing
- First Online:
To report our unique approach for individualizing robotic prostate cancer surgery by risk stratification and sub classification of the periprostatic space into 4 distinct compartments, and thus performing 4 precise different grades of nerve sparing based on neurosurgical principles and to present updated potency and continence outcomes data of patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) using our risk-stratified approach based on layers of periprostatic fascial dissection.
Patients and methods
(1) Between January 2005 and December 2010, 2,536 men underwent RALP by a single surgeon at our institution. (2) Included patients were those with ≥1-year follow-up and were preoperatively continent and potent, defined as having a SHIM questionnaire score of >21; thus, the final number of patient in the study cohort was 1,335. (3) Postoperative potency was defined as the ability to have successful intercourse (score of ≥4 on question 2 of the SHIM); continence was defined as the use of no pads per 24 h.
(1) The potency and continence for NS grades 1, 2, 3, and 4 were found to be 90.6, 76.2, 60.5, and 57.1 % (P < 0.001) and 98, 93.2, 90.1, and 88.9 % (P < 0.001), respectively. (2) The overall PSM rates for patients with NS grades 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 10.5, 7, 5.8, and 4.8 %, respectively (P = 0.064).
The study found a correlation between risk-stratified grades of NS technique and continence and potency. Patients with lesser grades of NS had higher rates of potency and continence.
KeywordsProstate cancer Nerve sparing Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Continence Potency
- 3.Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M, Ravi P, Ghani KR, Bianchi M, Jeong W, Shariat SF, Hansen J, Schmitges J, Jeldres C, Rogers CG, Peabody JO, Montorsi F, Menon M, Karakiewicz PI (2012) Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol 61(4):679–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, Sandler HM, Northouse L, Hembroff L, Lin X, Greenfield TK, Litwin MS, Saigal CS, Mahadevan A, Klein E, Kibel A, Pisters LL, Kuban D, Kibel A, Kaplan I, Wood D, Ciezki J, Shah N, Wei JT (2008) Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 358(12):1250–1261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Tewari AK, Srivastava A, Huang MW, Robinson BD, Shevchuk MM, Durand M, Sooriakumaran P, Grover S, Yadav R, Mishra N, Mohan S, Brooks DC, Shaikh N, Khanna A, Leung R (2011) Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). BJU Int 108(6 Pt 2):984–992. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10565.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Srivastava A, Chopra S, Pham A, Sooriakumaran P, Durand M, Chughtai B, Gruschow S, Peyser A, Harneja N, Leung R, Lee R, Herman M, Robinson B, Shevchuk M, Tewari A (2012) Effect of a risk-stratified grade of nerve-sparing technique on early return of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.009. ISSN 0302-2838. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283812008147
- 23.Alsaid B, Bessede T, Diallo D, Moszkowicz D, Karam I, Benoit G, Droupy S (2011) Division of autonomic nerves within the neurovascular bundles distally into corpora cavernosa and corpus spongiosum components: immunohistochemical confirmation with three-dimensional reconstruction. Eur Urol 59(6):902–909PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Rao S, Tu JJ, Jhaveri JK, Yadav R, Leung RA, Martinez-Salamanca JI, Takenaka A, Te AE, Bartsch Georg, Darracott Vaughan E, Tewari AK (2008) Distributions of peri-prostatic nerves in the fascial planes around the prostate—implications for technique of nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 179(4 Suppl):228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Ramanathan R, Shih G, Yang XJ, JJ Tu, Mandhani A, Rao S, Darracott Vaughan E, Tewari AK (2008) MRI based classification of variations in neurovascular structures around the seminal vesicles: implication for a modified seminal vesicle dissection technique during robotic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 179(4 Suppl):611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Dev H, Rickman D, Sooriakumaran P, Srivastava A, Grover S, Leung R, Kim R, Kitabayashi N, Esqueva R, Park K, Padilla J, Rubin M, Tewari A (2011) Biobanking after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a quality assessment of providing prostate tissue for RNA studies. J Transl Med 9:121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Tewari A, Srivastava A, Sooriakumaran P, Grover S, Dorsey P, Leung R (2011) Technique of traction-free nerve-sparing robotic prostatectomy: delicate tissue handling by real-time penile oxygen monitoring. Int J Impot ResGoogle Scholar
- 31.Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel V, Rassweiler J, Van Poppel H (2009) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 55(5):1037–1063PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar