World Journal of Urology

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 741–745

Radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder reconstruction following prior radical prostatectomy

  • Eric Yi-Hsiu Huang
  • Eila C. Skinner
  • Stuart D. Boyd
  • Jie Cai
  • Gus Miranda
  • Siamak Daneshmand
Original Article



To review the perioperative and follow-up outcomes of patients undergoing radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder reconstruction for bladder cancer after prior radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer.


A retrospective review of more than 1,900 patients treated with radical cystectomy at USC between 1990 and 2011 was conducted. Fifty-six patients were identified who were previously treated with RP for prostate cancer. Twenty-four of these patients (43 %) underwent orthotopic neobladder reconstruction. Perioperative data and follow-up including postoperative continence were analyzed.


The median age at cystectomy for these 24 patients was 68 years (range 55–89). The types of neobladder reconstruction were Kock neobladder in 3, Sigmoid reservoir in 1, Studer neobladder in 12, and T-pouch ileal neobladder in 8 patients. There were no major intraoperative complications. Of 19 patients eligible for evaluation of post-cystectomy urinary control, 11 patients (57.9 %) with good continence (0–1 pad/day) after RP regained preoperative level of urinary control after cystectomy within 1 year. The continence rate of 13 post-RP patients with good continence was 84.6 %. Among the 4 patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy after RP, 1 regained good continence. One with poor continence after prostatectomy had an artificial urethral sphincter (AUS) placed 2 months after cystectomy, and 2 with fair and poor continence after prostatectomy had an AUS placed at the time of cystectomy.


Patients undergoing radical cystectomy after prior RP pose a challenge to urologists. Those who are continent post-RP have a fair chance of regaining good urinary control with neobladder reconstruction. Adjuvant radiotherapy for prostate cancer may have a negative impact on continence with neobladder reconstruction.


Urinary bladder neoplasms Prostatic neoplasms Cystectomy Prostatectomy Urinary reservoirs, continent 


  1. 1.
    Etzioni R, Penson DF, Legler JM, di Tommaso D, Boer R, Gann PH, Feuer EJ (2002) Overdiagnosis due to prostate-specific antigen screening: lessons from U.S. prostate cancer incidence trends. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:981–990. doi:10.1093/jnci/94.13.981 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schuster TG, Marcovich R, Sheffield J, Montie JE, Lee CT (2003) Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer after definitive prostate cancer treatment. Urology 61:342–347. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02272-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jayram G, Katz MH, Steinberg GD (2010) Radical cystectomy in patients previously treated for localized prostate cancer. Urology 76:1430–1433. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2010.01.048 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miotto A Jr, Dall’oglio M, Srougi M (2004) Cystectomy with orthotopic reconstruction following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int Braz J Urol 30:125–127. doi:10.1590/S1677-55382004000200009 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stein JP, Skinner DG (2006) Radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer: long-term results of a standard procedure. World J Urol 24:296–304. doi:10.1007/s00345-006-0061-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tolhurst SR, Rapp DE, O’Connor C, Lyon MB, Orvieto MA, Steinberg GD (2005) Complications after cystectomy and urinary diversion in patients previously treated for localized prostate cancer. Urology 66:824–829. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2005.04.046 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Novara G, Marco VD, Aragona M, Boscolo-Berto R, Cavalleri S, Artibani W, Ficarra V (2009) Complications and mortality after radical cystectomy for bladder transitional cell cancer. J Urol 182:914–921. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.032 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chang SS, Cookson MS, Baumgartner RG, Wells N, Smith JA Jr (2002) Analysis of early complications after radical cystectomy: results of a collaborative care pathway. J Urol 167:2012–2016. doi:10.1097/00005392-200205000-00017 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jakobsen H, Vedel P, Andersen JT (1987) Objective assessment of urinary incontinence: an evaluation of three different pad-weighting tests. Neurourol Urodyn 6:325–330. doi:10.1002/nau.1930060407 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jonler M, Madsen FA, Rhodes PR, Sall M, Messing EM, Bruskewitz RC (1996) A prospective study of quantification of urinary incontinence and quality of life in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 48:433–440. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00216-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Donnellan SM, Duncan HJ, MacGregor RJ, Russell JM (1997) Prospective assessment of incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: objective and subjective analysis. Urology 49:225–230. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00451-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smither AR, Guralnick ML, Davis NB, See WA (2007) Quantifying the natural history of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence using objective pad test data. BMC Urol 7:2. doi:10.1186/1471-2490-7-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Machold S, Olbert PJ, Hegele A, Kleinhans G, Hofmann R, Schrader AJ (2009) Comparison of a 20-min pad test with the 1-hour pad test of the international continence society to evaluate post-prostatectomy incontinence. Urol Int 83:27–32. doi:10.1159/000224864 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Yi-Hsiu Huang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eila C. Skinner
    • 1
  • Stuart D. Boyd
    • 1
  • Jie Cai
    • 1
  • Gus Miranda
    • 1
  • Siamak Daneshmand
    • 1
  1. 1.USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Taipei Veterans General Hospital and National Yang-Ming UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations