Advertisement

World Journal of Urology

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 555–559 | Cite as

Tensor fascia lata flap reconstruction following groin dissection: is it worthwhile?

  • T. J. NirmalEmail author
  • Ashish K. Gupta
  • Santosh Kumar
  • Antony Devasia
  • Ninan Chacko
  • Nitin S. kekre
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

To compare the morbidity of primary skin closure with elective Tensor Fascia Lata (TFL) flap cover in groin dissections.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective study between January 2007 and December 2009. All patients undergoing groin dissections without skin involvement were included.

Results

Of the twenty-five patients, who underwent groin dissections, 14 had primary skin closure (28 groin dissections)—group I. Eleven had TFL flap cover as a means of primary reconstruction (20 groin dissections)—group II. In group I, there were 16 (57%) inguinal dissections and 12 (43%) ilioinguinal block dissections, whereas 82% in group II underwent ilioinguinal dissections (p = 0.09). Wound infection requiring treatment with a culture specific antibiotic was required in 4 (14%) in group I (n = 28) and only 1 (5%) in group II (n = 20) (p = 0.38). In group I, 7 (25%) had major flap necrosis and minor necrosis was seen in another 7 (25%). Only three (15%) in group II developed minor flap necrosis (p = 0.01). Following an ilioinguinal dissection, flap necrosis occurred in 75% of groins that underwent primary closure and in 17% of those which were reconstructed with TFL (p = 0.001). Seroma formation was seen in 5 (18%) in group I and 3 (15%) in group II (p = 1.0). Lymphoedema occurred in equal numbers in both groups. The duration of hospital stay was 20 ± 14 days in the primary closure group and 16 ± 3 days in the TFL group.

Conclusion

The TFL flap can reduce postoperative morbidity and decrease hospital stay. Prophylactic TFL flap reconstruction following ilioinguinal dissections is advisable.

Keywords

Tensor fascia lata Groin dissection Ilioinguinal 

Notes

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ravi R (1993) Morbidity following groin dissection for penile carcinoma. Br J Urol 72:941PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nelson BA, Cookson MS, Smith Jr JA, Chang SS (2004) Complications of inguinal and pelvic lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: a contemporary series. J Urol 172:494Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prakash S (1982) The use of myocutaneous flaps in block dissections of the groin in cases with gross skin involvement. Br J Plast Surg 35:413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abraham V, Ravi R, Shrivastava BR (1992) Primary reconstruction to avoid wound breakdown following groin block dissection. Br J Plast Surg 45:211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wangensteen OH (1934) Repair of recurrent and difficult hernias and other large defects of the abdominal wall employing the iliotibial tract of fascia lata as a pedicled flap. Surg Gynecol Obstet 59:766Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nahai F, Hill HL, Hester TR (1979) Experiences with the tensor fascia lata flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Catalona WJ (1988) Modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis with preservation of saphenous veins: technique and preliminary results. J Urol 140:306Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gupta AK, Kingsly PM, Jeeth IJ, Dhanraj P (2006) Groin reconstruction after inguinal block dissection. Indian J Urol 22:355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bevan-Thomas R, Slaton JW, Pettaway CA (2002) Contemporary morbidity from lymphadenectomy for penile squamous cell carcinoma: the M. D. Anderson cancer center experience. J Urol 167:1638Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ornellas AA, Seixas AL, Marota A (1994) Surgical treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: retrospective analysis of 350 cases. J Urol 151:1244Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gopinath KS, Chandrashekhar M, Kumar MV, Srikant KC (1988) Tensor fasciae latae musculocutaneous flaps to reconstruct skin defects after radical inguinal lymahadenectomy. Br J Plast Surg 41:366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hill HL, Hester R, Nahai F (1979) Covering large groin defects with the tensor fascia lata musculocutaneous flap. Br J Plast Surg 32:12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Russo P, Saldana EF, Yu S, Chaglassian T, Hidalgo DA (1994) Myocutaneous flaps in genitourinary oncology. J Urol 151:920PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Safak T, Klebuc MJA, KeÇik A, Sheneq SM (1996) The subcutaneous pedicle tensor fascia lata flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. J. Nirmal
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ashish K. Gupta
    • 2
  • Santosh Kumar
    • 1
  • Antony Devasia
    • 1
  • Ninan Chacko
    • 1
  • Nitin S. kekre
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of UrologyChristian Medical CollegeVelloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Plastic SurgeryChristian Medical CollegeVelloreIndia

Personalised recommendations