World Journal of Urology

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 451–456 | Cite as

Sequential resection of malignant ureteral margins at radical cystectomy: a critical assessment of the value of frozen section analysis

  • Georgios Gakis
  • David Schilling
  • Sven Perner
  • Christian Schwentner
  • Karl-Dietrich Sievert
  • Arnulf Stenzl
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of frozen section analysis (FSA) for detecting and eliminating malignant ureteral margins at radical cystectomy (RC) and to determine the impact of final margin status obtained by a sequential resectioning strategy on the risk of upper urinary tract recurrence (UUT-R).

Methods

A total of 425 ureteral margins obtained from 218 patients undergoing RC for invasive bladder cancer between 1999 and 2009 were initially examined by FSA. When positive, additional resections were performed. Subsequently, all specimens were reexamined on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections. Fisher-Exact test/logistic regression were used for uni-/multivariate analysis and log-rank test for the impact of margin status on UUT-R.

Results

Of 425 specimens, malignant ureteral margins were found on initial FSA in 17, on FFPE in 23 (sensitivity: 73.9%). FSA results were false-positive in 1/402 margins (specificity: 99.8%) resulting in an overall accuracy of 98.3%. On multivariate analysis (95%-CI), correlations were found between distal ureteral malignancy and FSA (p < 0.0001) and tumor multifocality (p = 0.04). In 10/17 positive initial margins it was not possible to obtain a negative final margin despite multiple reresections, of which one resulted in a UUT recurrence, which was more frequent than in patients with a negative margin (4/208, p = 0.03). Moreover, three of these five recurrences were proximally to the anastomosis. All patients had multifocal disease at RC.

Conclusions

FSA has a high accuracy for detecting malignant ureteral margins. Patients with positive final margins are at increased risk of UUT-R. With sequential resection, however, positive margins cannot reliably be converted to negative ones.

Keywords

Accuracy Frozen section analysis Radical cystectomy Risk factors Tumor multifocality Ureteral margin 

References

  1. 1.
    Stenzl A, Cowan N, De Santis M et al (2009) The updated EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Eur Urol 55:815–825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Farrow GM, Utz DC, Rife CC (1976) Morphological and clinical observations of patients with early bladder cancer treated with total cystectomy. Cancer Res 36:2495–2501PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sharma TC, Melamed MR, Whitmore WF Jr (1970) Carcinoma in situ of the ureter in patients with bladder carcinoma treated by cystectomy. Cancer 26:583–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Linker DG, Whitmore WF (1975) Ureteral carcinoma in situ. J Urol 113:777–780PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnson DE, Wishow KI, Tenney D (1989) Are frozen section examinations of ureteral margins required for all patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Urology 33:451–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schoenberg MP, Carter HB, Epstein JI (1996) Ureteral frozen section analysis during cystectomy: a reassessment. J Urol 155:1218–1220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Silver DA, Stroumbakis N, Russo P, Fair WR, Herr HW (1997) Ureteral carcinoma in situ at radical cystectomy: does the margin matter? J Urol 158:768–771PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sanderson KM, Cai J, Miranda G, Skinner DG, Stein JP (2007) Upper urinary tract recurrence following radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma: an analysis of 1069 patients with 10-year follow-up. J Urol 177:2088–2094PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee SE, Byun SS, Hong SK et al (2006) Significance of cancer involvement at the ureteral margin detected on routine frozen section analysis during radical cystectomy. Urol Int 77:13–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tran W, Serio A, Raj GV et al (2008) Longitudinal risk of upper tract recurrence following radical cystectomy for urothelial cancer and the potential implications for long-term surveillance. J Urol 179:96–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schumacher MC, Scholz M, Weise ES, Fleischmann A, Thalmann GN, Studer UE (2006) Is there an indication for frozen section examination of the ureteral margins during cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder? J Urol 176:2409–2413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2009) Urological tumours. In: Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (eds) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 262–265Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VR, Mostofi FK (1998) The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Am J Surg Pathol 22:1435–1448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Raj GV, Tal R, Vickers A et al (2006) Significance of intraoperative ureteral evaluation at radical cystectomy for urothelial cancer. Cancer 107:2167–2172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Touma N, Izawa JI, Abdelhady M, Moussa M, Chin JL (2010) Ureteral frozen sections at the time of radical cystectomy: reliability and clinical implications. Can Urol Assoc J 4:28–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Osman Y, El-Tabey N, Abdel-Latif M, Mosbah A, Moustafa N, Shaaban A (2006) The value of frozen-section analysis of ureteric margins on surgical decision-making in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. BJU Int 99:81–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Volkmer BG, Schnoeller T, Kuefer R, Gust K, Finter F, Hautmann RE (2009) Upper urinary tract recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer––who is at risk? J Urol 18:2632–2637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Herr HW, Whitmore WF Jr (1987) Ureteral carcinoma in situ after successful intravesical therapy for superficial bladder tumours: incidence, possible pathogenesis and management. J Urol 138:292–294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sved PD, Gomez P, Nieder AM, Manoharan M, Kim SS, Soloway MS (2004) Upper tract tumour after radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: incidence and risk factors. BJU Int 94:785–789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yossepowitch O, Dalbagni G, Golijanin D et al (2003) Orthotopic urinary diversion after cystectomy for bladder cancer: implications for cancer control and patterns of disease recurrence. J Urol 169:177–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grossman HB, Natale RB, Tangen CM et al (2003) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. N Engl J Med 349:859–866PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georgios Gakis
    • 1
  • David Schilling
    • 1
  • Sven Perner
    • 2
  • Christian Schwentner
    • 1
  • Karl-Dietrich Sievert
    • 1
  • Arnulf Stenzl
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of UrologyUniversity Hospital Tuebingen, Eberhard-Karls UniversityTübingenGermany
  2. 2.Department of PathologyEberhard-Karls UniversityTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations