World Journal of Urology

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 437–442 | Cite as

Active surveillance for prostate cancer: trials and tribulations

Topic Paper

Abstract

Introduction

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening results in the detection of prostate cancer in many men who are not destined to die from the disease. This often results in overtreatment. One approach to reducing the overtreatment effect is to treat selectively by observing patients with favorable risk disease, and treating only the subsets who are reclassified as higher risk over time, based on biochemical or pathologic progression of disease.

Methods

The data supporting the active surveillance concept is reviewed, including the results of several large-scale Phase 2 studies. A number needed to treat analysis was performed based on these studies and a large randomized trial of radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting. The arguments in favor of, and opposed to, active surveillance are presented.

Results

The largest, most mature Phase 2 study of active surveillance has reported an 85% overall survival and 99% disease-specific survival with a median follow-up of 8 years (range 2–11 years). The number needed to treat analysis suggests that between 80 and 100 radical prostatectomies would be required for each prostate cancer death avoided in a favorable risk, screen detected population.

Conclusion

Active surveillance appears to be safe for favorable risk prostate cancer and represents an appealing alternative to radical treatment for all newly diagnosed men. Further follow-up and a randomized study design are required to conclusively demonstrate the safety of this approach over the 15- to 20-year time frame. A large-scale randomized trial has recently been initiated internationally to address this question.

Keywords

Prostate cancer Active surveillance Review Low-risk disease Conservative management 

Notes

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Welch HG, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S (2005) Prostate-specific antigen levels in the United States: implications of various definitions for abnormal. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(15):1132–1137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Blank K, Broderick GA, Tomaszewski JE, Renshaw AA, Kaplan I, Beard CJ, Wein A (1998) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 280:969–974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Albertsen P, Hanley JA, Fine J (2005) 20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 293:2095–2101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Albertsen PC, Hanley JA, Barrows GH, Penson DF, Kowalczyk PD, Sanders MM, Fine J (2005) Prostate cancer and the Will Rogers phenomenon. Natl Cancer Inst 97:1248–1253Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Draisma G, Boer R, Otto SJ, van der Cruijsen IW, Damhuis RA, Schröder FH, de Koning HJ (2003) Lead times and overdetection due to PSA screening: estimates from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(12):868–878PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tornblom M, Eriksson H, Franzén S, Gustafsson O, Lilja H, Norming U, Hugosson J (2004) Lead time associated with screening for prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 108(1):122–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hanash K, Utz DC, Cook EN, Taylor WF, Titus JL (1972) Carcinoma of the prostate: a 15-year followup. J Urol 107:450–453PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johansson JE, Holmberg L, Johansson S, Bergström R, Adami HO (1997) Fifteen-year survival in prostate cancer. A prospective, population-based study in Sweden. JAMA 277(6):467–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lerner SP, Seale-Hawkins C, Carlton CE Jr, Scardino PT (1991) The risk of dying of prostate cancer in patients with clinically localized disease. J Urol 146(4):1040–1045PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Handley R, Carr TW, Travis D, Powell PH, Hall RR (1988) Deferred treatment for prostate cancer. Br J Urol 62(3):249–253PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adolfsson J, Carstensen J, Löwhagen T (1992) Deferred treatment in clinically localized prostate carcinoma. Brit J Urol 69:183–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Waaler G, Stenwig AE (1993) Prognosis of localised prostatic cancer managed by “Watch and Wait” policy. Br J Urol 72:214–219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Whitmore W Jr, Warner JA, Thompson IM Jr (1991) Expectant management of localized prostatic cancer. Cancer 67:1091–1096PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    George N (1988) Natural history of localised prostatic cancer managed by conservative therapy alone. Lancet 1(8584):494–497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aus G, Hugosson I, Norlen L (1995) Long-term survival and mortality in prostate cancer treated with noncurative intent. J Urol 154:460–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sandblom G, Dufmats M, Varenhorst E (2000) Long-term survival in a Swedish population-based cohort of men with prostate cancer. Urology 56:442–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parker C (2004) Active surveillance: towards a new paradigm in the management of early prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol 5:101–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parker C (2003) Active surveillance: an individualized approach to early prostate cancer. BJU Int 92:2–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Choo R, Klotz L, Danjoux C, Morton GC, DeBoer G, Szumacher E, Fleshner N, Bunting P, Hruby G (2002) Feasibility study: watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression. J Urol 167:1664–1669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Choo R, DeBoer G, Klotz L, Danjoux C, Morton GC, Rakovitch E, Fleshner N, Bunting P, Kapusta L, Hruby G (2001) PSA doubling time of prostate carcinoma managed with watchful observation alone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50:615–620PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, Häggman M, Andersson SO, Bratell S, Spångberg A, Busch C, Nordling S, Garmo H, Palmgren J, Adami HO, Norlén BJ, Johansson JE, Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study No. 4 (2005) Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting (update). N Engl J Med 352(19):1977–1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khatami A, Aus G, Damber JE, Lilja H, Lodding P, Hugosson J (2006) PSA doubling time predicts the outcome after active surveillance in screening-detected prostate cancer: results from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, Sweden section. Int J Cancer 120:170–174Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Soloway MS, Soloway CT, Williams S, Ayyathurai R, Kava B, Manoharan M (2008) Active surveillance; a reasonable management alternative for patients with prostate cancer: the Miami experience. BJU Int 101(2):165–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Carter HB, Kettermann A, Warlick C, Metter EJ, Landis P, Walsh PC, Epstein JI (2007) Expectant management of prostate cancer with curative intent: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience. J Urol 178(6):2359–2365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Parker C, Muston D, Melia J, Moss S, Dearnaley D (2006) A model of the natural history of screen-detected prostate cancer, and the effect of radical treatment on overall survival. Br J Cancer 94(10):1361–1368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    D’Amico AV, Chen MH, Roehl KA, Catalona WJ (2004) Preoperative PSA velocity and the risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med 351(2):125–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Scattoni V, Zlotta A, Montironi R, Schulman C, Rigatti P, Montorsi F (2007) Extended and saturation prostatic biopsy in the diagnosis and characterisation of prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 52(5):1309–1322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Steineck G, Helgesen F, Adolfsson J, Dickman PW, Johansson JE, Norlen BJ, Holmberg L, Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer Group Study Number 4 (2002) Quality of life after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting. N Engl J Med 347(11):790–796PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Burnet KL, Parker C, Dearnaley D, Brewin CR, Watson M (2007) Does active surveillance for men with localized prostate cancer carry psychological morbidity? BJU Int 100(3):540–543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of UrologySunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations