How accurate are present risk group assignment tools in penile cancer?
- 139 Downloads
To evaluate the accuracy of the predictive models available to estimate the risk of lymph node metastases and cancer-specific survival in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.
A nonsystematic review of the literature was performed searching MEDLINE in January 2008.
Most of the authors select patients for early inguinal lymphadenectomy according to the pathologic extension of the primary tumor and its histologic grade, as recommended by the EAU Guidelines and the Solsona risk groups. Although the Solsona risk groups performed slightly better, both risk groups had low predictive accuracy. A nomogram including eight clinical and pathologic variables (tumor thickness, microscopic growth pattern, Broder’s grade, presence of vascular or lymphatic embolization, infiltrations of the corpora cavernosa, corpus spongiosum or urethra, and the clinical stage of groin lymph nodes) was developed to estimate the risk of lymph node involvement at follow-up. Two nomograms are currently available able to estimate the 5-year cancer-specific survival probabilities of the patients. The first nomogram included the clinical lymph node stage and the same pathological variables of the primary tumor at penectomy, while the pathological stage of the lymph nodes replaced the clinical one in the second model. All the 3 nomograms had good prognostic accuracy.
Both the Solsona and EAU risk group assessment had low prognostic accuracy, although the Solsona risk groups performed slightly better. The nomograms designed to predict the risk of lymph node metastases showed and cancer-specific survival had good prognostic accuracy but their external validation is still lacking.
KeywordsSquamous cell carcinoma Penile neoplasm Lymphadenectomy Nomograms
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest.
- 10.Ficarra V, Zattoni F, Cunico SC, Galetti TP, Luciani L, Fandella A, Guazzieri S, Maruzzi D, Sava T, Siracusano S, Pilloni S, Tasca A, Martignoni G, Gardiman M, Tardanico R, Zambolin T, Cisternino A, Artibani W (2005) Lymphatic and vascular embolizations are independent predictive variables of inguinal lymph node involvement in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: Gruppo Uro-Oncologico del Nord Est (Northeast Uro-Oncological Group) Penile Cancer data base data. Cancer 103:2507–2516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Tobias-Machado M, Tavares A, Ornellas AA, Molina WR Jr, Juliano RV, Wroclawski ER (2007) Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: a new minimally invasive procedure for radical management of inguinal nodes in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma. J Urol 177:953–957 (discussion 958)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Solsona E, Iborra I, Rubio J, Casanova JL, Ricos JV, Calabuig C (2001) Prospective validation of the association of local tumor stage and grade as a predictive factor for occult lymph node micrometastasis in patients with penile carcinoma and clinically negative inguinal lymph nodes. J Urol 165:1506–1509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Novara G, Artibani W, Cosciani Cunico S, De Giorgi G, Gardiman M, Martignoni G, Siracusano S, Tardanico R, Zattoni F, Ficarra V, and Members of the GUONE Penile Cancer Project (2008) How accurately Solsona and EAU risk groups predict the risk of lymph node metastases in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis? Urology (in press)Google Scholar
- 18.Slaton JW, Morgenstern N, Levy DA, Santos MW Jr, Tamboli P, Ro JY, Ayala AG, Pettaway CA (2001) Tumor stage, vascular invasion and the percentage of poorly differentiated cancer: independent prognosticators for inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile squamous cancer. J Urol 165:1138–1142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Ficarra V, Zattoni F, Artibani W, Fandella A, Martignoni G, Novara G, Galetti TP, Zambolin T, Kattan MW (2006) Nomogram predictive of pathological inguinal lymph node involvement in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 175:1700–1704 (discussion 1704–1705)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Kattan MW, Ficarra V, Artibani W, Cunico SC, Fandella A, Martignoni G, Novara G, Galetti TP, Zattoni F (2006) Nomogram predictive of cancer specific survival in patients undergoing partial or total amputation for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 175:2103–2108 (discussion 2108)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar