World Journal of Urology

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 188–192 | Cite as

Current status of robotics in female urology and gynecology

  • Daniel S. Elliott
  • George K. Chow
  • Matthew Gettman
Topic Paper


Currently, there has been limited reporting and research in the female urology and gynecological literature concerning the use of robotics. To date, robotics have been utilized only for the treatment of three benign gynecologic conditions: benign hysterectomy; repair of vesicovaginal fistula; and sacrocolpopexy which is a treatment for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. We describe a novel minimally invasive technique of vaginal vault prolapse repair and present our initial experience. The surgical technique involves placement of five laparoscopic ports: three for the daVinci® robot and two for the assistant. A polypropylene mesh is then attached to the sacral promontory and to the vaginal apex using Gortex sutures. Thirty-one patients underwent a robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy at our institution in the past 24 months for severe symptomatic vaginal vault prolapse. Complications were limited to mild port site infections in two patients, which resolved with oral antibiotic therapy. While our early experience utilizing robotic repairs in female urology and gynecology is encouraging, long-term data are needed to confirm these findings and establish longevity of the repair.


Robotics Laparoscopy Sacrocolpopexy Vaginal vault prolapse 


  1. 1.
    Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA (2005) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizing a robotic surgical system. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 9(1):13–15Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sundaram BM, Kalidasan G, Hemal AK (2006) Robotic repair of vesicovaginal fistula: a case-series of 5 patients. Urology (in press)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    DiMarco DS, Chow GK, Gettman MT, Elliott DS (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Urology 63(2):373–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elliott DS, Frank I, DiMarco DS, Chow GK (2004) Gynecological use of robotically assisted laparoscopy: sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high-grade vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Surg 188(Suppl):52S–56SCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jenkins TR (2004) Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(6):1875–1884CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu CK, Cutner A, Mould T, Olaitan A (2005) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy as a primary surgical treatment for endometrial cancer in morbidly obese women. Br J Obstet Gynecol 112(1):115–117Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barakat RR (2005) Laparoscopically assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15(2):407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Subair O, Omojole F, Mistry N, Morgan H (2004) Trainees and the management of ectopic pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol 24(7):811–812CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marchionni M, Bracco GL, Checcucci V, Carabaneanu A, Coccia EM, Mecacci F et al. (1999) True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse. Thirteen years of experience. J Reprod Med 44(8):679–684PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dwyer PL, Lee ETC, Hay DM (1988) Obesity and urinary incontinence in women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 95:91–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Virtanen HS, Makinen JI (1993) Retrospective analysis of 711 patients operated on for pelvic relaxation in 1983–1989. Int J Gynecol Obstet 42:109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olsen A, Smith V, Bergstrom J, Colling J, Clark A (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89(4):501–506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Addison WA, Timmons MC (1993) Abdominal approach to vaginal eversion. Clin Obstet Gynecol 36(4):995–1004PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Timmons MC, Addison WA, Addison SB, Cavenar MG (1992) Abdominal sacral colpopexy in 163 women with posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele. J Repro Med 37(4):323–327Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Coates K, Low VHS, Bump RC, Addison WA (1997) Abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy: a new approach for correction of posterior compartment defects and perineal descent associated with vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177(6):1345–1353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Snyder TE, Krantz KE (1991) Abdominal-retroperitoneal sacral colpopexy for the correction of vaginal prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 77(6):944–949PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Menefee SA, Miller KF, Wall LL (1999) Results of abdominal sacral colpopexy using polyester mesh in the treatment of posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele. Obstet Gynecol 54(9):563–565Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reddy K, Malik TG (2002) Short-term and long-term follow-up of abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: initial experience in a district general hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol 22(5):532–536CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Addison WA, Timmons MC, Wall LL, Livengood CH (1989) Failed abdominal sacral colpopexy: observations and recommendations. Obstet Gynecol 74(3 pt 2):480–483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Addison WA, Timmons MC (1997) Abdominal sacral colpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse with enterocele. In: Rock JA, Thompson JD (eds) Te Linde’s operative gynecology, 8th edn. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Webb MJ, Aronson MP, Ferguson LK, Lee RA (1998) Posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: primary repair in 693 patients. Obstet Gynecol 92(2):281–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Podratz LK, Ferguson VR, Lee RA, Symmonds RE (1995) Abdominal sacral colpopexy for posthysterectomy vaginal vault descensus. Obstet Gynecol 50(10):719–720Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Karram M, Goldwasser S, Kleeman S, Steele A, Vassallo B, Walsh P (2001) High uterosacral vaginal vault suspension with fascial reconstruction for vaginal repair of enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185(6):1339–42; discussion 42–43Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E (1996) Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(6):1418–21; discussion 21–22Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ostrzenski A (1996) Laparoscopic colposuspension for total vaginal prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 55(2):147–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cosson M, Rajabally R, Bogaert E, Querleu D, Crepin G (2002) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, hysterectomy, and burch colposuspension: feasibility and short-term complications of 77 procedures. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 6(2):115–119Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cosson M, Bogaert E, Narducci F, Querleu D, Crepin G (2000) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: short-term results and complications in 83 patients. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod Paris 29(8):746–750PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Montironi PL, Petruzzelli P, Di Noto C, Gibbone C, De Sanctis C, Fedele M (2000) Combined vaginal and laparoscopic surgical treatment of genito-urinary prolapse. Minerva Ginecol 52(7–8):283–288PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel S. Elliott
    • 1
  • George K. Chow
    • 1
  • Matthew Gettman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Urology, Sections of Female Urology and Urologic LaparoscopyMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations