World Journal of Urology

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 88–93 | Cite as

Categorisation of complications of endoscopic extraperitoneal and laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy

  • Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
  • Robert Rabenalt
  • Minh Do
  • Benjamin Lee
  • Michael C. Truss
  • Hartwig Schwaibold
  • Martin Burchardt
  • Udo Jonas
  • Evangelos N. Liatsikos
Review

Abstract

The aim of the present review is to focus on the various attempts of categorisation of complications after endoscopic extraperitoneal and laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Several classifications of complications and adverse events have been proposed in the literature but none is widely accepted or applied so far. We thus present a review of the existing literature and the complications of our series of 900 patients treated with endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE). We applied the recently revised Clavien classification system to grade EERPE complications.

Keywords

Laparoscopy Endoscopic radical prostatectomy Complications Clavien system Prostate cancer 

References

  1. 1.
    Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, Roumeguere T, Damoun A, Ekane S, Hoffmann P, Zlotta AR, Schulman CC (2001) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Results after 50 cases. Eur Urol 40:65–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cathelineau X, Cahill D, Widmer H, Rozet F, Baumert H, Vallancien G (2004) Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal approach for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a false debate over a real challenge. J Urol 171:714–716CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Stock C, Frede T (2001) Heilbronn laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technique and results after 100 cases. Eur Urol 40:54–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rassweiler J, Seeman O, Schulze M, Teber D, Hatzinger M, Frede T (2003) Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 169:1689–1693CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guillonneau B, el-Fettouh H, Baumert H, Cathelineau X, Doublet JD, Fromont G, Vallancien G (2003) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases at Montsouris Institute. J Urol 169:1261–1266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stolzenburg J-U, Rabenalt R, Do M, Ho K, Dorschner W, Waldkirch E, Jonas U, Schütz A, Horn L, Truss MC (2005) Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE)—oncological and functional results after 700 procedures. J Urol 174:1271–1275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rozet F, Galiano M, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Cathala N, Vallancien G (2005) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation of 600 cases. J Urol 174:908–911CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Rabenalt R, Pfeiffer H, Horn L, Truss MC, Jonas U, Dorschner W (2003) Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE)—initial experience after 70 procedures. J Urol 169:2066–2071CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Pfeiffer H, König F, Aedtner B, Dorschner W (2002) The endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): technique and initial experience. World J Urol 20:48–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stolzenburg JU, Truss MC (2003) Technique of laparoscopic (endoscopic) radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 91:749–757CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stolzenburg JU, Truss MC, Do M, Rabenalt R, Pfeiffer H, Dunzinger M, Aedtner B, Stief CG, Jonas U, Dorschner W (2003) Evolution of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE)—technical improvements and development of a nerve-sparing, potency-preserving approach. World J Urol 21:147–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stolzenburg JU, Truss MC, Bekos A, Do M., Rabenalt R, Stief CG, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, Neuhaus J, Dorschner W (2004) Does the extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach improve the outcome of radical prostatectomy? Curr Urol Rep 5:115–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Cathelineau X, Lay F, Barret E, Doublet JD, Baumert H, Vallancien G (2002) Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3-year experience. J Urol 167:51–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111:518–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gonzalgo ML, Pavlovich CP, Trock BJ, Link RE, Sullivan W, Su LM (2005) Classification and trends of perioperative morbidities following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 174:135–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Veen EJ, Janssen-Heijnen ML, Leenen LP, Roukema JA (2005) The registration of complications in surgery: a learning curve. World J Surg 29:402–409CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bhandari A, McIntire L, Kaul SA, Hemal AK, Peabody JO, Menon M (2005) Perioperative complications of robotic radical prostatectomy after the learning curve. J Urol 174:915–918CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Arai Y, Egawa S, Terachi T, Suzuki K, Gotoh M, Kawakita M, Tanaka M, Terada N, Baba S, Okumura K, Hayami S, Ono Y, Matsuda T, Naito S (2003) Morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: summary of early multi-institutional experience in Japan. Int J Urol 10:430–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martina GR, Giumelli P, Scuzzarella S, Remotti M, Caruso G, Lovisolo J (2005) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy-learning curve of a laparoscopy-naive urologist in a community hospital. Urology 65:959–963CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Borkowski T, Gettman M, Katz R, Salomon L, Zaki S, de la Taille A, Abbou CC (2003) Assessment of surgical technique and perioperative morbidity associated with extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 61:617–622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dillioglugil Ö, Leibman BD, Leibman NS, Kattan MW, Rosas AL, Scardino PT (1997) Risk factors for complications and morbidity after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 157:1760–1767CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guillonneau B, Gupta R, El Fettouh H, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, Vallancien G (2003) Laparoscopic management of rectal injury during radical prostatectomy. J Urol 169:1694–1696CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bishoff JT, Allaf ME, Kirkels W, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR, Schroder F (1999) Laparoscopic bowel injury: incidence and clinical presentation. J Urol 161:887–890CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vallancien G, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, Doublet JD, Guillonneau B (2002) Complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in urology: review of 1,311 procedures at a single center. J Urol 168:23–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    van Velthoven RF (2005) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach: is there an advantage for the patient? Curr Opin Urol 15:83–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
    • 1
  • Robert Rabenalt
    • 1
  • Minh Do
    • 1
  • Benjamin Lee
    • 2
  • Michael C. Truss
    • 3
  • Hartwig Schwaibold
    • 4
  • Martin Burchardt
    • 5
  • Udo Jonas
    • 5
  • Evangelos N. Liatsikos
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of UrologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Department of UrologyAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Long Island Jewish Medical CenterNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of UrologyKlinikum DortmundDortmundGermany
  4. 4.Bristol Urological InstituteSouth Mead HospitalBristolUK
  5. 5.Department of UrologyMedizinische Hochschule HannoverHannoverGermany
  6. 6.Department of UrologyUniversity of PatrasPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations