World Journal of Urology

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 93–101

Cognitive and partner-related factors in rapid ejaculation: Differences between dysfunctional and functional men.

Topic Paper


Despite the high prevalence of rapid ejaculation in community samples, there is still a paucity of data on cognitive and other relevant aspects of the subjective experience of premature ejaculation (PE) patients and their functional counterparts. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to expand our understanding of the complex nature of rapid ejaculation disorders by providing a detailed characterization of ejaculatory patterns, behavioral aspects, cognitive, and partner-related factors in a sample of unselected PE patients compared to a group of functional men. To explore the areas that might differentiate PE men from their sexually functional counterparts, a multidimensional self-administered questionnaire, the PEQuest, was created. This 36-item instrument addresses a number of domains relevant to ejaculatory function and dysfunction such as ejaculatory latencies and ejaculatory control, cognitions and feelings during sexual intercourse, factors interfering with ejaculatory control, techniques to delay ejaculation, and partnership factors. A total of 45 PE patients (mean age: 41.8 years) and 72 non-patients (mean age: 37.1 years) were included. The results show significant group differences in the majority of PEQuest domains. In the functional group, an average intravaginal latency time of 12.8 min (median: 10 min) was reported compared to 3.7 min (median: 2 min) in the patient group with 87% of PE patients ejaculating within 2 min and 100% within 5 min after penetration. In their subjective experience in sexual situations, PE patients were totally preoccupied with thoughts about controlling their orgasm, with the anxious anticipation of a possible failure, and thoughts about keeping their erection while the inner experience of functional men is focused on sexual arousal and sexual satisfaction. The factors that maximally impede the control of ejaculation are similar for both groups, but functional men normally succeed in adapting their sexual behavior to these factors whereas PE men fail in their efforts. Regarding partner-related factors, PE patients felt less secure and experienced with respect to female sexuality than their functional counterparts, and more often reported a discrepancy between their own limited experience and the more extensive sexual experience of their partner. In conclusion, a number of salient differences in ejaculatory behavior, cognitive-affective patterns, and partner-related factors between PE patients and functional men could be delineated in this study, indicating that chronic rapid ejaculation is a serious disorder with a profound impact on the man’s life and his partnership.


Rapid/premature ejaculation Ejaculatory dysfunction Ejaculatory control Ejaculatory latency 


  1. 1.
    Grenier G, Byers ES (1997) The relationships among ejaculatory control, ejaculatory latency, and attempts to prolong heterosexual intercourse. Arch Sex Behav 26:27–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hartmann U, Uhlemann H (1995) Phänomenologische und psychophysiologische Merkmale der Ejaculatio praecox: Ergebnisse einer empirischen Vergleichsstudie. Sexuologie 3:131–147Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaplan HS (1974) The new sex therapy. Brunner Mazel, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rowland DL, Strassberg DS, De Gouveia Brazao CA, Slob AK (2000) Ejaculatory latency and control in men with premature ejaculation: an analysis across sexual activities using multiple sources of information. J Psychosom Res 48:69–77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rowland DL, Cooper SE, Schneider M (2001) Defining premature ejaculation for experimental and clinical investigations. Arch Sex Behav 30:235–253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rowland DL, Tai WL, Slob AK (2003) An exploration of emotional response to erotic stimulation in men with premature ejaculation: effects of treatment with clomipramine. Arch Sex Behav 32:145–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rowland DL, Tai W, Brummett K (2003) Interactive processes in ejaculatory disorders: psychophysiological considerations. 30 Annual Meeting of the International Academy of Sex Research, Bloomington, IndianaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schmidt G (1993) Tendenzen und Entwicklungen. Einleitung zur dritten Auflage. In: Arentewicz G, Schmidt G (eds) Sexuell gestörte Beziehungen. Enke, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Symonds T, Roblin D, Hart K, Althof S (2003) How does premature ejaculation impact a man’s life? JSex Marital Ther 29:361–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Waldinger MD, Hengelveld MW, Zwinderman AH, Olivier B (1998) An empirical operationalization study of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for premature ejaculation. Int J Psychiatry Clin Prac 2:287Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Waldinger MD (2002) The neurobiological approach to premature ejaculation. J Urol 168:2359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Waldinger MD (2003) Rapid ejaculation. In: Levine SB, Risen CB, Althof SE (eds) Handbook of clinical sexuality for mental health professionals. Brunner-Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Hartmann
    • 1
  • M. Schedlowski
    • 2
  • T. H. C. Krüger
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Clinical PsychologyDeptartment of Clinical Psychiatry and PsychotherapyGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Behavioral SciencesPsychology and Behavioral ImmunobiologySES C 28092 ZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations