Advertisement

The Ameliorative Role of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid (ALA) Under Cr Stress in Two Maize Cultivars Showing Differential Sensitivity to Cr Stress Tolerance

  • Ume Habiba
  • Shafaqat Ali
  • Muhammad Rizwan
  • Muhammad Bilal Hussain
  • Afzal Hussain
  • Pravej Alam
  • Abdulaziz A. Alqarawi
  • Abeer Hashem
  • Elsayed Fathi AbdAllah
Article
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

Heavy metal (HM) contamination of the environment is a serious threat to sustainable crop production. Among the HMs, chromium (Cr) is one of the most toxic HMs that is known to negatively affect growth and metabolic activities of diverse crop plants. The present study was designed to investigate the ameliorative role of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) under Cr stress in two maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars showing differential sensitivity to Cr tolerance. ALA is a biosynthesis precursor and it has a dominant regulatory effect related to physiological, respiratory, and photosynthesis processes in various plant species. Three concentrations of Cr (0, 5, and 10 mg kg−1) were tested under the graded levels of ALA application (0, 12.5, and 25 mg L−1). The results indicated that Cr stress differentially reduced plant growth attributes, gas exchange characteristics, photosynthetic pigments, and biomass in both the cultivars. Oxidative stress increased as evidenced in the form of electrolyte leakage, malondialdehyde, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) accumulation in plants. The anti-oxidative enzyme activities, that is, catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and peroxidase (POD) both in the leaves and roots of maize cultivars decreased due to Cr stress. The concentration of Cr increased in roots and shoots of maize under Cr levels without ALA. Under Cr stress, ALA exogenous application markedly enhanced plant growth, photosynthetic pigments, gas exchange capacity, and biomass. Furthermore, ALA application decreased the Cr-induced oxidative stress in maize cultivars by improving the activities of CAT, POD, and SOD in plants. After ALA application, the Cr concentrations and total Cr uptake by plants differently decreased in both cultivars. The 6103 cultivar of maize was found to be a tolerant cultivar against Cr stress due to its strong defensive system with a higher rate of antioxidant enzyme activities. On the other hand, the other maize cultivar (9108) was found to be a sensitive cultivar against Cr stress due to its weak defense system with higher contents of reactive oxygen species. These findings suggest that ALA can play a regulatory role in maintaining optimum plant growth and efficient photosynthetic processes under Cr-challenged habitats in maize. Thus, ALA application may be used as a sustainable remedial strategy to alleviate Cr-induced stress in maize cultivars.

Keywords

Chromium 5-Aminolevulinic acid Maize Photosynthetic pigment Oxidative stress 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Higher Education Commission (HEC) Islamabad, Pakistan (IPFP/HRD/HEC/2014/1035) and Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan. The authors would also like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for its funding to the Research Group number (RG-1435-014).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All the authors do not have any conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Aebi H (1984) Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol 105:121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afshan S, Ali S, Bharwana SA, Rizwan M, Farid M, Abbas F, Ibrahim M, Mehmood MA, Abbasi GH (2015) Citric acid enhances the phytoextraction of chromium, plant growth, and photosynthesis by alleviating the oxidative damages in Brassica napus L. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:11679–11689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmad P, Jaleel CA, Salem MA, Nabi G, Sharma S (2010) Roles of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants in plants during abiotic stress. Crit Rev Biotechnol 30:161–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmad P, Latef AA, Abd_Allah EF, Hashem A, Sarwat M, Anjum NA, Gucel S (2016) Calcium and potassium supplementation enhanced growth, osmolytes, secondary metabolite production, and enzymatic antioxidant machinery in cadmium-exposed chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Front Plant Sci 7:112Google Scholar
  5. Ahmad P, Ahanger MA, Egamberdieva D, Alam P, Alyemeni MN, Ashraf M (2017a) Modification of osmolytes and antioxidant enzymes by 24-epibrassinolide in chickpea seedlings under mercury (Hg) toxicity. J Plant Growth Regul 37:309–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ahmad R, Ali S, Hannan F, Rizwan M, Iqbal M, Hassan Z, Akram NA, Maqbool S, Abbas F (2017b) Promotive role of 5-aminolevulinic acid on chromium-induced morphological, photosynthetic, and oxidative changes in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea botrytis L.). Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:8814–8824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Air T, Akram NA, Kausar S, Farid N, Ashraf M, AL-Qurainy FA (2018) 5-Aminolevulinic acid induces regulation in growth, yield and physio-biochemical characteristics of wheat under water stress. Sains Malays 47:661–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Akram NA, Ashraf M (2013) Regulation in plant stress tolerance by a potential plant growth regulator, 5-aminolevulinic acid. J Plant Growth Regul 32:663–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ali B, Huang CR, Qi ZY, Ali S, Daud MK, Geng XX, Liu HB, Zhou WJ (2013a) 5-Aminolevulinic acid ameliorates cadmium-induced morphological, biochemical, and ultrastructural changes in seedlings of oilseed rape. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:7256–7267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ali B, Wang B, Ali S, Ghani MA, Hayat MT, Yang C, Xu L, Zhou WJ (2013b) 5-Aminolevulinic acid ameliorates the growth, photosynthetic gas exchange capacity, and ultrastructural changes under cadmium stress in Brassica napus L. J Plant Growth Regul 32:604–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ali B, Xu X, Gill RA, Yang S, Ali S, Tahir M, Zhou W (2014) Promotive role of 5-aminolevulinic acid on mineral nutrients and antioxidative defense system under lead toxicity in Brassica napus. Ind Crops Prod 52:617–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ali S, Chaudhary A, Rizwan M, Anwar HT, Adrees M, Farid M, Irshad MK, Hayat T, Anjum SA (2015) Alleviation of chromium toxicity by glycinebetaine is related to elevated antioxidant enzymes and suppressed chromium uptake and oxidative stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:10669–10678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Anjum SA, Ashraf U, Imran KH, Tanveer M, Shahid M, Shakoor A, Longchang WA (2017) Phyto-toxicity of chromium in maize: oxidative damage, osmolyte accumulation, anti-oxidative defense and chromium uptake. Pedosphere 27:262–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ashfaque F, Inam A, Iqbal S, Sahay S (2017) Response of silicon on metal accumulation, photosynthetic inhibition and oxidative stress in chromium-induced mustard (Brassica juncea L.). S Afr J Bot 111:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Balasaraswathi K, Jayaveni S, Sridevi J, Sujatha D, Aaron KP, Rose C (2017) Cr-induced cellular injury and necrosis in Glycine max L.: biochemical mechanism of oxidative damage in chloroplast. Plant Physiol Biochem 118:653–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Balestrasse KB, Tomaro ML, Batlle A, Noriega GO (2010) The role of 5-aminolevulinic acid in the response to cold stress in soybean plants. Phytochemistry 71:2038–2045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bindu RC, Vivekanandan M (1998) Hormonal activities of 5-aminolevulinic acid in callus induction and micropropagation. Plant Growth Regul 26:15–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Choudhary SP, Kanwar M, Bhardwaj R, Yu JQ, Tran LS (2012) Chromium stress mitigation by polyamine-brassinosteroid application involves phytohormonal and physiological strategies in Raphanus sativus L. PLoS ONE 7:1–11Google Scholar
  19. Czarnecki O, Gläßer C, Chen JG, Mayer KF, Grimm B (2012) Evidence for a contribution of ALA synthesis to plastid-to-nucleus signaling. Front Plant Sci 3:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Daud MK, Mei L, Variath MT, Ali S, Li C, Rafiq MT, Zhu SJ (2014) Chromium(VI) uptake and tolerance potential in cotton cultivars: effect on their root physiology, ultramorphology, and oxidative metabolism. BioMed Res Int 2014:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dhindsa RS, Plumb-Dhindsa P, Thorpe TA (1981) Leaf senescence: correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. J Exp Bot 32:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dionisio-Sese ML, Tobita S (1998) Antioxidant responses of rice seedlings to salinity stress. Plant Sci 135:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dwivedi SK, Arora A, Singh VP, Singh GP (2018) Induction of water deficit tolerance in wheat due to exogenous application of plant growth regulators: membrane stability, water relations and photosynthesis. Photosynthetica 56:478–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Farid M, Ali S, Rizwan M, Ali Q, Abbas F, Bukhari SA, Saeed R, Wu L (2017) Citric acid assisted phytoextraction of chromium by sunflower; morpho-physiological and biochemical alterations in plants. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 145:90–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Farid M, Ali S, Rizwan M, Ali Q, Saeed R, Nasir T, Abbasi GH, Rehmani MI, Ata-Ul-Karim ST, Bukhari SA, Ahmad T (2018) Phyto-management of chromium contaminated soils through sunflower under exogenously applied 5-aminolevulinic acid. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 151:255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gill RA, Zang L, Ali B, Farooq MA, Cui P, Yang S, Ali S, Zhou W (2015a) Chromium-induced physio-chemical and ultrastructural changes in four cultivars of Brassica napus L. Chemosphere 120:154–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gill RA, Ali B, Islam F, Farooq MA, Gill MB, Mwamba TM, Zhou W (2015b) Physiological and molecular analyses of black and yellow seeded Brassica napus regulated by 5-aminolivulinic acid under chromium stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 94:130–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Habiba U, Ali S, Hafeez F, Rizwan M, Rehman MZ, Hussain A, Asad SA (2018) Morpho-physiological responses of maize cultivars exposed to chromium stress. Int J Agric Biol.  https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.0874 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Han R, Gao G, Li Z, Dong Z, Guo Z (2018) Effects of exogenous 5-aminolevulinic acid on seed germination of alfalfa (Medicago varia Martyn.) under drought stress. Grassland Sci 64:100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heath RL, Packer L (1968) Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. Arch Biochem Biophys 125:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Herman S, Marco G, Cecilia B, Alfonso V, Luis M, Cristián V, Sebastián P, Sebastián A (2016) Effect of water availability on growth, water use efficiency and omega 3 (ALA) content in two phenotypes of chia (Salvia hispanica L.) established in the arid Mediterranean zone of Chile. Agric Water Manag 173:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hernández-Madrigal F, Ortiz-Castro R, Ruiz-Herrera LF, Cervantes C, López-Bucio J, Martínez-Trujillo M (2018) Sucrose protects arabidopsis roots from chromium toxicity influencing the auxin–plethora signaling pathway and improving meristematic cell activity. J Plant Growth Regul 37:530–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hussain A, Ali S, Rizwan M, Rehman MZ, Javed MR, Imran M, Chatha SA, Nazir R (2018a) Zinc oxide nanoparticles alter the wheat physiological response and reduce the cadmium uptake by plants. Environ Pollut 242:1518–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hussain A, Ali S, Rizwan M, Rehman MZ, Hameed A, Hafeez F, Alamri SA, Alyemeni MN, Wijaya L (2018b) Role of zinc–lysine on growth and chromium uptake in rice plants under Cr stress. J Plant Growth Regul 2018:1–10Google Scholar
  35. Jabeen N, Abbas Z, Iqbal M, Rizwan M, Jabbar A, Farid M, Ali S, Ibrahim M, Abbas F (2016) Glycinebetaine mediates chromium tolerance in mung bean through lowering of Cr uptake and improved antioxidant system. Arch Agron Soil Sci 62:648–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jana S, Choudhuri MA (1981) Glycolate metabolism of three submersed aquatic angiosperms: effect of heavy metals. Aquat Bot 11:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Keller C, Rizwan M, Davidian JC, Pokrovsky OS, Bovet N, Chaurand P, Meunier JD (2015) Effect of Silicon on wheat seedlings (Triticum turgidum L.) grown in hydroponics and exposed to 0 to 30 µM Cu. Planta 241:847–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kishore PV, Madhuvarasu SS, Moru S (2018) Stimulus responsive hydrogel-coated etched fiber Bragg grating for carcinogenic chromium(VI) sensing. Opt Eng 57:017101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kosar F, Akram NA, Ashraf M (2015) Exogenously-applied 5-aminolevulinic acid modulates some key physiological characteristics and antioxidative defense system in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings under water stress. S Afr J Bot 96:71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Liu T, Hu X, Zhang J, Zhang J, Du Q, Li J (2018) H2O2 mediates ALA-induced glutathione and ascorbate accumulation in the perception and resistance to oxidative stress in Solanum lycopersicum at low temperatures. BMC Plant Biol 18:34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu M, Li J, Niu J, Wang R, Song J, Lv J, Zong X, Wang S (2016) Interaction of drought and 5-aminolevulinic acid on growth and drought resistance of Leymus chinensis seedlings. Acta Ecol Sin 36:180–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mohanty N, Vass I, Demeter S (1989) Impairment of photosystem 2 activity at the level of secondary quinone electron acceptor in chloroplasts treated with cobalt, nickel and zinc ions. Physiol Plant 76:386–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Naeem MS, Rasheed M, Liu D, Jin ZL, Ming DF, Yoneyama K, Takeuchi Y, Zhou WJ (2011) 5-Aminolevulinic acid ameliorates salinity-induced metabolic, water-related and biochemical changes in Brassica napus L. Acta Physiol Plant 33:517–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Naeem MS, Warusawitharana H, Liu H, Liu D, Ahmad R, Waraich EA, Xu L, Zhou W (2012) 5-Aminolevulinic acid alleviates the salinity-induced changes in Brassica napus as revealed by the ultrastructural study of chloroplast. Plant Physiol Biochem 57:84–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nafees M, Ali S, Naveed M, Rizwan M (2018) Efficiency of biogas slurry and Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN to improve growth, physiology, and antioxidant activity of Brassica napus L. in chromium-contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:6387–6397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Oh YJ, Song H, Shin WS, Choi SJ, Kim YH (2007) Effect of amorphous silica and silica sand on removal of chromium(VI) by zero-valent iron. Chemosphere 66:858–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pei ZF, Ming DF, Liu D, Wan GL, Geng XX, Gong HJ, Zhou WJ (2010) Silicon improves the tolerance to water-deficit stress induced by polyethylene glycol in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings. J Plant Growth Regul 29:106–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE (1989) Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta 975:384–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Qayyum MF, Rehman MZ, Ali S, Rizwan M, Naeem A, Maqsood MA, Khalid H, Rinklebe J, Ok YS (2017) Residual effects of monoammonium phosphate, gypsum and elemental sulfur on cadmium phytoavailability and translocation from soil to wheat in an effluent irrigated field. Chemosphere 174:515–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ranieri E, Gikas P (2014) Effects of plants for reduction and removal of hexavalent chromium from a contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rehman MZ, Rizwan M, Ghafoor A, Naeem A, Ali S, Sabir M, Qayyum MF (2015) Effect of inorganic amendments for in situ stabilization of cadmium in contaminated soils and its phyto-availability to wheat and rice under rotation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:16897–16906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rehman MZ, Rizwan M, Ali S, Fatima N, Yousaf B, Naeem A, Sabir M, Ahmad HR, Ok YS (2016) Contrasting effects of biochar, compost and farm manure on alleviation of nickel toxicity in maize (Zea mays L.) in relation to plant growth, photosynthesis and metal uptake. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 133:218–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rizwan M, Meunier JD, Davidian JC, Pokrovsky OS, Bovet N, Keller C (2016) Silicon alleviates Cd stress of wheat seedlings (Triticum turgidum L. cv. Claudio) grown in hydroponics. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:1414–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rizwan M, Ali S, Qayyum MF, Ok YS, Rehman MZ, Abbas Z, Hannan F (2017) Use of maize (Zea mays L.) for phytomanagement of Cd-contaminated soils: a critical review. Environ Geochem Health 39:259–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Saleem M, Asghar HN, Khan MY, Zahir ZA (2015) Gibberellic acid in combination with pressmud enhances the growth of sunflower and stabilizes chromium(VI)-contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:10610–10617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shakoor MB, Ali S, Hameed A, Farid M, Hussain S, Yasmeen T, Najeeb U, Bharwana SA, Abbasi GH (2014) Citric acid improves lead (Pb) phytoextraction in Brassica napus L. by mitigating Pb-induced morphological and biochemical damages. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 109:38–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Srivastava RK, Rajpoot R, Pandey P, Rani A, Dubey RS (2018) Cadmium alters mitochondrial membrane potential, inhibits electron transport chain activity and induces callose deposition in rice seedlings. J Plant Growth Regul 37:335–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stambulska UY, Bayliak MM, Lushchak VI (2018) Chromium(VI) toxicity in legume plants: modulation effects of rhizobial symbiosis. BioMed Res Int 2018:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tassi E, Giorgetti L, Morelli E, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL, Barbafieri M (2017) Physiological and biochemical responses of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) exposed to nano-CeO2 and excess boron: modulation of boron phytotoxicity. Plant Physiol Biochem 110:50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tauqeer HM, Ali S, Rizwan M, Ali Q, Saeed R, Iftikhar U, Ahmad R, Farid M, Abbasi GH (2016) Phytoremediation of heavy metals by Alternanthera bettzickiana: growth and physiological response. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 126:138–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tripathi DK, Singh VP, Kumar D, Chauhan DK (2012) Impact of exogenous silicon addition on chromium uptake, growth, mineral elements, oxidative stress, antioxidant capacity, and leaf and root structures in rice seedlings exposed to hexavalent chromium. Acta Physiol Plant 34:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vassilev A, Iordanov I, Chakalova E, Kerin V (1995) Effect of cadmium stress on growth and photosynthesis of young barley (H. vulgare L.) plants and structural and functional changes in the photosynthetic apparatus. Bulg J Plant Physiol 21:2–21Google Scholar
  63. Wang J, Chen C (2009) Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future. Biotechnol Adv 27:195–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang LJ, Jiang WB, Huang BJ (2004) Promotion of 5-aminolevulinic acid on photosynthesis of melon (Cucumis melo) seedlings under low light and chilling stress conditions. Physiol Plant 121:258–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wang LJ, Jiang WB, Liu H, Liu WQ, Kang L, Hou XL (2005) Promotion by 5-aminolevulinic acid of germination of pakchoi (Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis var. communis Tsen et Lee) seeds under salt stress. J Integ Plant Biol 47:1084–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wang Q, Liang X, Dong Y, Xu L, Zhang X, Hou J, Fan Z (2013) Effects of exogenous nitric oxide on cadmium toxicity, element contents and antioxidative system in perennial ryegrass. Plant Growth Regul 69:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wu LE, Levina A, Harris HH, Cai Z, Lai B, Vogt S, James DE, Lay PA (2016) Carcinogenic chromium(VI) compounds formed by intracellular oxidation of chromium(III) dietary supplements by adipocytes. Angew Chem Int Ed 55:1742–5174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wu S, Hu Y, Zhang X, Sun Y, Wu Z, Li T, Lv J, Li J, Zhang J, Zheng L, Huang L (2018) Chromium detoxification in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis mediated by sulfur uptake and metabolism. Environ Exp Bot 147:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Xiaomeng LI, Li ZH, Qiling SO, Chang J, Jiabao YE, Zhang W, Yongling LI, Feng XU (2018) Effects of 5-aminolevulinic acid on the photosynthesis, antioxidant system, and α-bisabolol content of Matricaria recutita. Notulae Bot Hortic Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 46:418–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Xiong JL, Wang HC, Tan XY, Zhang CL, Naeem MS (2018) 5-Aminolevulinic acid improves salt tolerance mediated by regulation of tetrapyrrole and proline metabolism in Brassica napus L. seedlings under NaCl stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 124:88–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yiu JC, Juang LD, Fang DY, Liu CW, Wu SJ (2009) Exogenous putrescine reduces flooding-induced oxidative damage by increasing the antioxidant properties of Welsh onion. Sci Hortic 120:306–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhang XZ (1992) The measurement and mechanism of lipid peroxidation and SOD, POD and CAT activities in biological system. In: Research methodology of crop physiology. Agriculture Press, Beijing, pp 208–211Google Scholar
  73. Zhang J, Li D-M, Gao Y, Yu B, Xia C-X, Bai J-G (2012) Pretreatment with 5-aminolevulinic acid mitigates heat stress of cucumber leaves. Biol Plantarum 56:780–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhang J, Kirkham MB (1994) Drought-stress-induced changes in activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase in wheat species. Plant Cell Physiol 35:785–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ume Habiba
    • 1
  • Shafaqat Ali
    • 1
  • Muhammad Rizwan
    • 1
  • Muhammad Bilal Hussain
    • 1
  • Afzal Hussain
    • 1
  • Pravej Alam
    • 2
  • Abdulaziz A. Alqarawi
    • 3
  • Abeer Hashem
    • 4
    • 5
  • Elsayed Fathi AbdAllah
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Sciences and EngineeringGovernment College UniversityFaisalabadPakistan
  2. 2.Biology Department, College of Science and HumanitiesPrince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University (PSAU)AlkharjKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  3. 3.Plant Production Department, College of Food and Agricultural SciencesKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
  4. 4.Botany and Microbiology Department, College of ScienceKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
  5. 5.Mycology and Plant Disease Survey Department, Plant Pathology Research InstituteARCGizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations