Advertisement

Journal of Plant Growth Regulation

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 262–272 | Cite as

Semisynthetic Triterpenes Derived from Euphorbia officinarum as Plant Growth Promoters and Inducers of Disease Resistance

  • Amal Smaili
  • Lalla Aicha Rifai
  • Noureddine Mazoir
  • Tayeb Koussa
  • Lydia Faize
  • Nuria Alburquerque
  • Lorenzo Burgos
  • Kacem Makroum
  • Belfaiza Malika
  • Ahmed Benharref
  • Mohamed FaizeEmail author
Article
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of application of the semisynthetic triterpenes 3β-acetoxy-norlup-20-one (F4) and 3-chloro-4α,14α-dimethyl-5α-cholest-8-ene (F6) triterpene derivatives from Euphorbia officinarum on the growth of tomato seedlings under normal conditions and when challenged with the pathogens Verticillium dahliae and Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Foliar spray of F4 and F6 significantly improved growth rate, fresh weight, dry weight, and leaf area. In addition, they enhanced several physiological parameters including photosynthetic pigments, proline content, and nitrate reductase activity. Moreover, they induced H2O2 accumulation and increased the activity of several antioxidant enzymes such as catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, and guaiacol peroxidase. They also enhanced disease resistance against V. dahliae and A. tumefaciens. These results suggest that the two semisynthetic triterpenes represent new plant growth regulators and inducers of plant disease resistance.

Keywords

Antioxidant defenses Euphorbia officinarum Growth Triterpene derivatives Yield Disease resistance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the University Chouaib Doukkali El Jadida (Morocco).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplementary material

344_2018_9838_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.9 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1974 KB)

References

  1. Alexieva V, Sergiev I, Mapelli S, Karanov E (2001) The effect of drought and ultraviolet radiation growth and stress markers in pea and wheat. Plant Cell Environ 24:1337–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali SS, Kumar GB, Khan M, Doohan FM (2013) Brassinosteroid enhances resistance to Fusarium diseases of barley. Phytopathology 103:1260–1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altmann T (1998) A tale of dwarfs and drugs: brassinosteroids to the rescue. Trends Genet 14:490–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Whaibi MH, Siddiqui MH, Al-Munqadhi BMA, Sakran AM, Ali HM, Basalah MO (2012) Influence of plant growth regulators on growth performance and photosynthetic pigments status of Eruca sativa Mill. J Med Plants Res 6:1948–1954Google Scholar
  5. Alyemeni MN, Al-Quwaiz SM (2016) Effect of 28-homobrassinolide on the performance of sensitive and resistant varieties of Vigna radiat. Saudi J Biol Sci 23:698–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andresen M, Cedergreen N (2010) Plant growth is stimulated by tea seed extract: a new natural growth regulator? HortScience 45:1848–1853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bajguz A, Tretyn A (2003) The chemical characteristic and distribution of brassinosteroids in plants. Phytochemistry 62:1027–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Basra AS (2000) Plant growth regulators in agriculture and horticulture: their role and commercial uses. Harworth Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  9. Bates LS, Waldren RD, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bednarczyk-Cwynar B, Zaprutko L (2015) Recent advances in synthesis and biological activity of triterpenic acylated oximes. Phytochem Rev 14:203–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benharref A, Lavergne JP (1985) Triterpenes issus des latex des euphorbes cactoides marocaines E. Resinifera, E. Echinus et E. Officinarum: Isolement,étude comparative par RMN 13C des quatres classes tetracycliques, eupho-lanostane, elemolanostane, lanostane et nor-31 lanostane. Bull Soc Chim Fr 5:965–972Google Scholar
  12. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of proteins utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng SY, Wang CM, Cheng HL, Chen HJ, Hsu YM, Lin YC, Chou CH (2013) Biological activity of oleanane triterpene derivatives obtained by chemical derivatization. Molecules 18:13003–13019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cherrab M, Bennani A, Charest PM, Serrhini MN (2002) Pathogenecity and vegetative compatibility of Verticillium dahlia Kleb. Isolates from olives in Morocco. J Phytopathol 150:703–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chinchilla D, Zipfal C, Robatzek S, Kemmerling B, Nurnberger T, Jones JDG, Felix G, Boller T (2007) A flagellin-induced complex of the receptor FLS2 and BGK1 initiates plant defence. Nature 448:497–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crozier A, Clifford MN, Asihara H, Humphrey AJ, Beale MH (2006) Terpenes. In: Crozier A, Clifford MN, Asihara H (eds) Plant secondary metabolites. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, pp 47–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dalio RJD, Pinheiro HP, Sodek L, Haddad CRB (2013) 24-epibrassinolide restores nitrogen metabolism of pigeon pea under saline stress. Bot Stud 54:9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deng XG, Zhu T, Peng XJ, Xi DH, Guo H, Yin Y, Zhang DW, Lin HH (2016) Role of brassinosteroid signaling in modulating Tobacco mosaic virus resistance in Nicotiana benthamiana. Sci Rep 6:20579.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20579 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Divi UK, Rahman T, Krishna P (2010) Brassinosteroid-mediated stress tolerance in Arabidopsis shows interactions with abscisic acid, ethylene and salicylic acid pathways. BMC Plant Biol 10:151.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dzubak P, Hajduch M, Vydra D, Hustova A, Kvasnica M, Biedermann D, Markova L, Urban M, Sarek J (2006) Pharmacological activities of natural triterpenoids and their therapeutic implications. Nat Prod Rep 23:394–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. El-sherbeny MR, Da Silva JAT (2013) Treatment with proline and tyrosine affect the growth and yield of beetroot and some pigments in beetroot leaves. J Hortic Res 21:95–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. El-shraiy AM, Hegazi AM (2009) Effect of acetyl salicylic acid, indole-3-butyric acid and gebberillic acid on plant growth and yield of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Aust J Basic Appl Sci 3:3514–3523Google Scholar
  23. Erdal S (2012) Alleviation of salt stress in wheat seedlings by mammalian sex hormones. J Sci Food Agric 92:1411–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Faize M, Faize L, Ishizaka M, Ishii H (2004) Expression of potential defense responses of Asian and European pears to infection with Venturia nashicola. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 64:319–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Faize M, Burgos L, Faize L, Petri C, Barba-Espin G, Díaz-Vivancos P, Clemente-Moreno MJ, Alburquerque N, Hernandez JA (2012) Modulation of tobacco bacterial disease resistance using cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase and Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase. Plant Pathol 5:858–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Faize M, Faize L, Petri C, Barba Espin G, Diaz-Vivancos P, Clemente Moreno MJ, Koussa T, Rifai LA, Burgos L, Hernandez JA (2013) Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase enhance in vitro shoot multiplication in transgenic plum. J Plant Physiol 170:625–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fariduddin Q, Hayat S, Ali B, Ahmad A (2006) Effect of 28-homobrassinolide on nitrate reductase, carbonic anhydrase activities and net photosynthetic rate in Vigna radiata. Acta Bot Croat 65:19–23Google Scholar
  28. Garg N, Singla R (2005) Nitrate reductase activity in roots and leaves of chickpea cultivars under salt stress. Span J Agric Res 3:248–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hayat S, Alyemeni MN, Hasan SA (2012) Foliar spray of brassinosteroid enhances yield and quality of Solanum lycopersicum under cadmium stress. Saudi J Biol Sci 19:325–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hood EE, Helmer GL, Fraley RT, Chilton MD (1986) The hypervirulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens A281 is encoded in a region of pTiBo542 outside of T-DNA. J Bacteriol 186:1291–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huang LR, Luo H, Yang XS, Chen L, Zhang JX, Wang DP, Hao XJ (2014) Enhancement of antibacterial and antitumor activities of pentacyclic triterpenes by introducing exocyclic α,β-unsaturated ketones moiety in ring A. Med Chem Res 23:4631–4641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Inskeep WP, Bloom PR (1985) Extinction coefficients of chlorophyll a and b in N,N-dimethylformamide and 80% acetone. Plant Physiol 77:483–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Janeczko A, Scoczowski A (2005) Mammalian sex hormones in plants. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 43:71–79Google Scholar
  34. Kagali S, Divi UK, Krochko JE, Keller WA, Krishna P (2007) Brassinosteroid confers tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica napus to a range of abiotic stresses. Planta 225:353–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kemen AC, Honkanen S, Melton RE, Findlay KC, Migford ST, Hayashi K, Haralampidis K, Rosser SJ, Osbourn A (2014) Investigation of triterpene synthesis and regulation in oats reveals a role of β-amyrin in determining root epidermal cell patterning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:8679–8684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kishor PBK, Sreenivasulu N (2014) Is proline accumulation per se correlated with stress tolerance or is proline homoeostasis a more critical issue? Plant Cell Environ 37:300–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kishor PBK, Hima Kumari P, Sunita MSL, Sreenivasulu N (2015) Role of proline in cell wall synthesis and plant development and its implications in plant ontogeny. Front Plant Sci 6:544.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00544 Google Scholar
  38. Koester RP, Skoneczka JA, Cary TR, Diers BW, Ainsworth EA (2014) Historical gains in soybean (Glycine max Merr.) seed yield are driven by linear increases in light interception, energy conversion, and partitioning efficiencies. J Exp Bot 65:3311–3321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lichtenthaler HK (1987) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Method Enzymol 148:350–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lobato AKS, Gonçalves-Vidigal MC, Vidigal Filho PS, Andrade CAB, Kvitschal MV, Bonato CM (2010) Relationships between leaf pigments and photosynthesis in common bean plants infected by anthracnose. New Zeal J Crop Hort 38:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maia CF, Serrao da Silva BR, Lobato AKS (2018) Brassinosteroids positively modulates growth: physiological, biochemical and anatomical evidence using tomato genotypes contrasting to dwarfism. J Plant Growth Regul.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-018-9802-2 Google Scholar
  42. Mattioli R, Costantino P, Trovato M (2009) Proline accumulation in plants not only stress. Plant Signal Behav 4:1016–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moerschbacher B, Heck B, Kogel KH, Obs O, Reisener H (1986) An elicitor of the hypersensitive lignification response in wheat leaves isolated from the rust fungus Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici. II. Induction of enzymes correlated with the biosynthesis of lignin. Z Naturforsch 41c:839–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Morinaka Y, Sakamoto T, Yoshiaki I, Masakazu A, Hidemi K, Motoyuki A, Makoto M (2006) Morphological alteration caused by Brassinosteroid insensitivity increases the biomass and grain production of rice. Plant Physiol 14:924–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moses T, Papadopoulou K, Osbourn A (2014) Metabolic and functional diversity of saponins, biosynthetic intermediates and semi-synthetic derivatives. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 49:439–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nakashita H, Yasuda M, Nitta T, Asami T, Fujioka S, Arai Y, Sekimata K, Takatsuto S, Yamaguchi I, Yoshida S (2003) Brassinosteroid functions in a broad range of disease resistance in tobacco and rice. Plant J 33:887–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ohara S, Ohira T (2003) Plant growth regulation effect of the triterpenoid saponin. J Wood Sci 49:59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pipattanawong N, Fujishige N, Yamane K, Ogata RC (1996) Effect of brassinosteroid on vegetative and reproductive growth in two day-neutral strawberries. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 65:651–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pociecha E, Dziurka M, Waligorski P, Krepski T, Janeczko T (2017) 24-Epibrassinolide pre-treatment modifies cold induced photosynthetic acclimation mechanisms and phytohormone response of perennial ryegrass in cultivar-dependent manner. J Plant Growth Regul 36:618–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saha S, Walia S, Kumar J, Parma BS (2010) Triterpenic saponin as regulator of plant growth. J Appl Bot Food Qual 83:189–195Google Scholar
  51. Sairam RK (1994) Effects of homobrassinolide application on plant metabolism and grain yield under irrigated and moisturestress conditions of two wheat varieties. Plant Growth Regul 14:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sarkar PK, Haque MS, Karim MA (2002) Effects of GA3 and IAA and their frequency of application on morphology, yield contributing characters and yield of soybean. J Agric Sci 1:119–122Google Scholar
  53. Silveira JAG, Matos JCS, Ceccato VM, Sampaio AH (1998) Costa RCL, Induction of reductase nitrate activity and nitrogen fixation in two Phaseolus species in relation to exogenous nitrate level. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 4:19–26Google Scholar
  54. Smaili A, Mazoir N, Rifai LA, Koussa T, Makroum K, Beharref A, Faize L, Alburquerque N, Burgos L, Belfaiza M, Faize M (2017) Antimicrobial activity of two semisynthetic triterpene derivatives from Euphorbia officinarum latex against fungal and bacterial phytopathogens. Nat Prod Commun 12:331–336Google Scholar
  55. Srivastava HS (1980) Regulation of nitrate reductase activity in higher plants. Phytochemistry 17:725–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thussagunpanit J, Jutamanee K, Kaveeta L, Chai-arree W, Pankean P, Homvisasevongsa S, Suksamram A (2015) Comparative effects of brassinosteroid and brassinosteroid mimic on improving photosynthesis, lipid peroxidation, and rice seed set under heat stress. J Plant Growth Regul 34:320–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thussagunpanit J, Jutamanee K, Homvisasevongsa S, Suksamram A, Yamagami A, Nakano T, Asami T (2017) Characterisation of synthetic ecdysteroid analogues as functional micmics of brassinosteroids in plant growth. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 172:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Weraduwage SM, Chen J, Anozie FC, Morales A, Weise SE, Sharkey TD (2015) The relationship between leaf area growth and biomass accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci 6:167.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Xia XJ, Wang YJ, Zhou YH, Tao Y, Mao WH, Shi K, Asami T, Chen Z, Yu JQ (2009) Reactive oxygen species are involved in Brassinosteroid-induced stress tolerance in Cucumber. Plant Physiol 150:801–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yang CJ, Zhang C, Lu YN, Jin JQ, Wang XL (2011) The mechanisms of brassinosteroid action’s: from signal transduction to plant development. Mol Plant 4:588–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zine H, Rifai LA, Koussa T, Bentiss F, Guesmi S, Laachir A, Makroum K, Belfaiza M, Faize M (2017) The mononuclear nickel(II) complex bis(azido-κN)bis[2,5-bis(pyridin-2-yl)-1,3,4-thiadiazole-κ2N2,N3]nickel(II) protects tomato from Verticillium dahlia by inhibiting fungal growth and activating plant defences. Pest Manag Sci 73:188–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amal Smaili
    • 1
  • Lalla Aicha Rifai
    • 1
  • Noureddine Mazoir
    • 2
  • Tayeb Koussa
    • 1
  • Lydia Faize
    • 3
  • Nuria Alburquerque
    • 3
  • Lorenzo Burgos
    • 3
  • Kacem Makroum
    • 1
  • Belfaiza Malika
    • 1
  • Ahmed Benharref
    • 4
  • Mohamed Faize
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Laboratory of Plant Biotechnology and Ecosystem Valorisation, Faculty of SciencesUniversity Chouaib DoukkaliEl JadidaMorocco
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences El JadidaUniversity Chouaib DoukkaliEl JadidaMorocco
  3. 3.Group of Fruit Tree Biotechnology, Department of Plant BreedingCEBAS-CSICMurciaSpain
  4. 4.Laboratory of Biomolecular Chemistry, Natural Substances and Reactivity, URAC 16, Faculty of Sciences SemlaliaCadi Ayyad UniversityMarrakechMorocco

Personalised recommendations