Advertisement

Journal of Plant Growth Regulation

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 370–379 | Cite as

Red and Blue Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) Participate in Mitigation of Hyperhydricity in In Vitro-Grown Carnation Genotypes (Dianthus Caryophyllus)

  • Sowbiya Muneer
  • Yoo Gyeong Park
  • Byoung Ryong JeongEmail author
Article

Abstract

The present study was to determine the factors that can reduce hyperhydricity in in vitro-propagated carnation genotypes. The carnation genotypes (Green Beauty, Purple Beauty, and Inca Magic) were grown in vitro under normal and hyperhydric conditions in white fluorescent light (FL) in which half of the hyperhydric plants were grown in red and blue LEDs (light emitting diodes). It was observed that hyperhydricity leads to oxidative stress in terms of TBARS (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances) content, whereas stress was alleviated by R (red) and B (blue) LEDs. The multiprotein complex proteins such as ATPase (RCI + LHC1) PSII-core dimer, PSII-monomer/ATPs synthase, and PSII-monomer/cyt b6f had decreased levels in hyperhydric conditions grown in white FL; however, the expression level of these photosynthetic proteins was retained in hyperhydric plants grown in R and B LEDs. Moreover, the immunoblots of two photosynthetic proteins (PsaA and PsbA) and stress-responsive proteins such as superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase, and catalase showed recovery of hyperhydricity in carnation genotypes grown in R and B LEDs. Our present study signifies that red (R) and blue light (B) LEDs reduced the hyperhydricity to control levels by maintaining the composition of thylakoid proteins and antioxidative defense mechanisms in carnation genotypes.

Keywords

Antioxidants BN-PAGE Carnation Hyperhydricity Western blots 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. Euikyung Kim, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Republic of Korea for sharing the BioRad ChemiDoc imaging system.

Funding

This work was supported from ‘Onsite Cooperative Agriculture Research’ (Project No. PJ01090805) RDA, Republic of Korea. SM was supported by BK21 Plus program (Brain Korea 21), Ministry of Education, Republic of Korea.

Author Contributions

SM designed and performed the experiments; SM analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; YG Park helped in maintaining the plant cultures; BRJ provided his lab for performing experiments.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ali A, Afrasiab H, Naz S, Rauf M, Iqbal J (2008) An efficient protocol for in vitro propagation of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). Pak J Bot 40:111–121Google Scholar
  2. Altvorst AG, Koehorst HJJ, Bruinsma T, Jansen J, Custers JBM, Jong J, Dons JJM (1992) Adventitious shoot formation from in vitro leaf explants of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). Sci Hortic 51:223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apostolo NM, Llorente BE (2000) Anatomy of normal and hyperhydric leaves and shoots of in vitro grown Simmondsia chinensis (Link) Schn. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 36:243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balen B, Tkalec M, Pavokovic D, Pevalek-Kozlina B, Krsnik-Rasol M (2009) Growth conditions in in vitro culture can induce oxidative stress in Mammillaria gracilis tissues. J Plant Growth Regul 28:36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basa B, Lattanzio G, Solti A, Tóth B, Abadía J, Fodor F et al (2014) Changes induced by cadmium stress and iron deficiency in the composition and organization of thylakoid complexes in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Environ Exp Bot 101:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principal of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brar MS, AlKhayri JM, Klingaman GL (1995) In vitro shoot multiplication of carnation axillary buds and nodes. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 31(3, Part 2):61AGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakrabarty D, Park SY, Ali MB, Shin KS, Paek KY (2005) Hyperhydricity in apple: ultrastructural and physiological aspects. Tree Physiol 26:377–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS (2003) Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol 30:239–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Debergh PC, Harbaoui Y, Lemeur R (1981) Mass propagation of globe artichoke (Cyanara scolymus) Evaluation of different hypotheses to overcome vitrification with special reference to water potential. Physiol Plant 53:181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dewir YH, Chakrabarty D, Ali MB, Hahn EJ, Paek KY (2006) Lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzyme activities of Euphorbia millii hyperhydric shoots. Environ Exp Bot 58:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fagioni M, D’Amici GM, Timperio AM, Zolla L (2009) Proteomic analysis of multiprotein complexes in the thylakoids membrane upon cadmium treatment. J Proteome Res 8:310–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fontes MA, Otoni WC, Carolino SMB, Brommonschenkel SH, Fontes EPB, Fári M, Louro RP (1999) Hyperhydricity in pepper plants regenerated in vitro: involvement of BiP (Binding protein) and ultrastructural aspects. Plant Cell Rep 19:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franck T, Kevers C, Gaspar T (1995) Protective enzymatic systems against activated oxygen species compared in normal and vitrified shoots of Prunus avium L. raised in vitro. Plant Growth Regul 16:253–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Franck T, Kevers C, Gaspar T, Dommes J, Deby C, Greimers R, Serteyn D, Deby-Dupont G. (2004) Hyperhydricity of Prunus avium shoots cultured on gelrite: a controlled stress response. Plant Physiol Biochem 42:519–527CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gaspar T, Kevers C, Franck T et al (1995) Paradoxical results in the results of hyperhydric tissues considered as being under stress: questions for a debate. Bulg J of Plant Physiol 21:80–97Google Scholar
  17. Hippler M, Klein J, Fink A, Allinger T, Hoerth P (2001) Towards functional proteomics of membrane protein complexes: analysis of thylakoid membranes from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant J 28:595–606CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jaspers P, Kangasjärvi J (2010) Reactive oxygen species in abiotic stress signaling. Physiol Plant 138:405–413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jausoro V, Llorente BE, Apóstolo NM (2010) Structural differences between hyperhydric and normal in vitro shoots of Handroanthus impetiginosus (Mart. ex DC) Mattos (Bignoniaceae). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 101:183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kanwar JK, Kumar S (2009) Influence of growth regulators and explants on shoot regeneration in carnation. Hortic Sci 4:140–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim K, Kook HS, Jang YJ, Lee WH, Kamala Kannan S, Chae JC et al (2013) The effect of blue-light-emitting diodes on antioxidant properties and resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato. Plant Pathol Microbiol 4:49Google Scholar
  22. Kleffmann T, Russenberger D, Zychlinski AV, Christopher W, Sjölander K, Gruissem W, Baginsky S (2004) The Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplasts proteome reveals pathway abundance and novel protein functions. Curr Biol 14(5):354–362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lai CC, Lin HM, Nalawade SM, Fang W, Tsay HS (2005) Hyperhydricity in shoot cultures of Scrophularia yoshimurae can be effectively reduced by ventilation of culture vessels. J Plant Physiol 162:355–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mittler R (2002) Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 7:405–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mittler R, Vanderauwera S, Suzuki N, Miller G, Tognetti VB, Vandepoele K, Gollery M, Shulaev V, Breusegem FV (2011) ROS signaling: the new wave? Trends Plant Sci 16:300–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Molassiotis AN, Diamantidis GC, Therios IN, Tsirakoglou V, Dimassi KN (2005) Oxidative stress, antioxidant activity and Fe(III)-chelate reductase activity of five Prunus rootstocks explants in response to Fe deficiency. Plant Growth Regul 46:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Muneer S, Kim TH, Qureshi MI (2012) Fe modulates Cd-induced oxidative stress and the expression of stress responsive proteins in the nodules of Vigna radiata. Plant Grow Regul 68:421–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Muneer S, Kim EJ, Park JS, Lee JH (2014a) Influence of green, red and blue light emitting diodes on multiprotein complex proteins and photosynthetic activity under different light intensities in lettuce leaves (Lactuca sativa L.). Int J Mol Sci 15:4657–4670CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Muneer S, Park YG, Manivannan A, Soundararajan P, Jeong BR (2014b) Physiological and proteomic analysis in chloroplasts of Solanum lycopersicum L. under silicon efficiency and salinity stress. Int J Mol Sci 15(12):21803–21824CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Muneer S, Ko CH, Soundararajan P, Manivnnan A, Park YG, Jeong BR (2015) Proteomic study related to vascular connections in watermelon scions grafted onto bottle-gourd rootstock under different light intensities. PLoS ONE 10(3):e0120899CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Muneer S, Soundararajan P, Jeong BR (2016) Proteomic and antioxidant analysis elucidates the underlying mechanism of tolerance to hyperhydricity stress in in vitro shoot cultures of Dianthus caryophyllus. J Plant Growth Regul. doi: 10.1007/s00344-015-9569-7 Google Scholar
  32. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15:473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Olmos E, Hellin E (1998) Ultrastructural differences of hyperhydric and normal leaves from regenerated carnation plants. Sci Hortic 75:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Picoli EAT, Otoni WC, Figueira ML, Carolino SMB, Almeida RS, Silva EAM, Carvalho CR, Fontes EPB (2001) Hyperhydricity in in vitro eggplant regenerated plants: structural characteristics and involvement of BiP (binding protein). Plant Sci 160:857–868CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ranieri A, Castagna A, Baldan B, Soldatini GF (2001) Iron deficiency differently affects peroxidase isoforms in sunflower. J Exp Bot 52:25–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rojas-Martinez L, Visser RG, de Klerk GJ (2010) The hyperhydricity syndrome: waterlogging of plant tissues as a major cause. Propag Ornam Plants 10:169–175Google Scholar
  37. Saher S, Piqueras A, Hellin E, Olmos E (2004) Hyperhydricity in micropropagated carnation shoots: the role of oxidative stress. Physiol Plant 120:152–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Saher S, Piqueras A, Hellin E, Olmos E (2005) Prevention of hyperhydricity in micropropagated carnation shoots by bottom cooling: implications of oxidative stress. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 81:149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saibo NJM, Lourenço T, Oliveira MM (2009) Transcription factors and regulation of photosynthetic and related metabolism under environmental stresses. Ann Bot 103:609–623CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Shigeoka S, Ishikawa T, Tamoi M, Miyagawa Y, Takeda T, Yabuta Y, Yoshimura K (2002) Regulation and function of ascorbate peroxidase isoenzymes. J Exp Bot 53:1305–1319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Song XS, Tiao CL, Shi K, Mao WH, Ogweno JO, Zhou YH, Yu JQ (2006) The response of antioxidant enzymes in cellular organelles in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) leaves to methyl viologen-induced photo-oxidative stress. Plant Growth Regul 49:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tian J, Jiang F, Wu Z (2014) The apoplastic oxidative burst as a key factor of hyperhydricity in garlic plantlet in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 120:571–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. van den Dries N, GiannìS Czerednik A, Krens FA, de Klerk GJ (2013) Flooding of the apoplast is a key factor in the development of hyperhydricity. J Exp Bot 64:5221–5230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang CQ, Zhang YF, Zhang YB (2008) Scavenger enzyme activities in subcellular fractions of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) under PEG-induced water stress. J Plant Growth Regul 27:387–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wijk KJV, Baginsky S (2011) Plastid proteomics in higher plants: current state and future goals. Plant Physiol 155:1578–1588CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilkinson S, Clephan AL, Davies WJ (2001) Rapid low temperature-induced stomatal closure occurs in cold-tolerant Commelina communis leaves but not in cold-sensitive tobacco leaves, via a mechanism that involves apoplastic calcium but not abscisic acid. Plant Physiol 126:1566–1578CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Wu Z, Chen LJ, Long YJ (2009) Analysis of ultrastructure and reactive oxygen species of hyperhydric garlic (Allium sativum L.) shoot. In vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 45:483–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yano A, Fujiwara K (2012) Plant lighting system with five wavelength-band light-emitting diodes providing photon flux density and mixing ratio control. Plant Methods 8:46CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Yorio NC, Goins GD, Kagie HR, Wheeler RM, Sager JC (2001) Improving spinach, radish, and lettuce growth under red light-emitting diodes (LEDs) with blue light supplementation. Hortic Sci 36:380–383Google Scholar
  50. Zhu JK (2002) Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev of Plant Biol 53:247–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sowbiya Muneer
    • 1
  • Yoo Gyeong Park
    • 2
  • Byoung Ryong Jeong
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Plus)Gyeongsang National UniversityJinjuSouth Korea
  2. 2.Institute of Agriculture and Life ScienceGyeongsang National UniversityJinjuSouth Korea
  3. 3.Research Institute of Life ScienceGyeongsang National UniversityJinjuSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations