Advertisement

Journal of Plant Growth Regulation

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 615–627 | Cite as

Growth Promotion and Flowering Induction in Mango (Mangifera indica L. cv “Ataulfo”) Trees by Burkholderia and Rhizobium Inoculation: Morphometric, Biochemical, and Molecular Events

  • Sergio de los Santos-Villalobos
  • Stefan de Folter
  • John P. Délano-Frier
  • Miguel A. Gómez-Lim
  • Doralinda A. Guzmán-Ortiz
  • Juan J. Peña-CabrialesEmail author
Article

Abstract

Inoculation of mango trees with Burkholderia caribensis XV and Rhizobium sp. XXV led to mango growth promotion (dry biomass increased in root 89 %, stem 34 %, leaves 51 %, and foliar area 53 %), floral fate (floral buds 100 %), and increased number of flowers (100 %). Nitrogen content in leaves was similar in inoculated and noninoculated trees, around 1.4 % (optimal condition for floral induction). The total foliar nitrogen content increased significantly (56 %) when the microbial inoculation treatment was applied. In addition, the initial content of sucrose, glucose, and fructose in leaves was higher in the microbial inoculation treatment trees but decreased during the evaluated period. The sucrose content in the noninoculated trees presented similar dynamics compared to the microbial inoculation treatment trees, but glucose and fructose showed increased values compared to those of the microbial inoculation treatment. FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) expression profiles normalized to ACTIN showed similar dynamics but different expression levels: RQ values of 0.03 and 0.05 for noninoculated and microbial inoculation treatments, respectively. In addition, FT expression profiles in microbial inoculation, normalized to the noninoculated treatment, showed an increased FT expression dynamic over time (up to RQ = 2.2), although a drastic decrease in the last sampling date, when all trees presented developed panicles and flowers, was observed. This FT upregulation was in accordance with the flowering induction in that treatment. Temperature had an important influence on mango flowering induction, which was observed for a 1-month period (~10 °C at night and 20 °C during the day). Bud growth that occurred during that period generated mixed and floral buds depending on the exposure time to these inductive temperatures, less than 2 weeks and more than 3 weeks, respectively. Data indicate that inoculation of mango trees with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (associated with this crop) is a potential alternative way to promote growth and induce flowering in mango, greatly reducing the high economical costs and environmental contamination associated with traditional agricultural practices.

Keywords

Mango Carbohydrates quantification Climate (environmental) conditions Flowering locusT Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Microbial inoculation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Jorge Molina Torres and MC. Enrique Ramírez Chavez for their help with the carbohydrate quantification by GC-MS, and to IB. Fannie Isela Parra Cota for her help with real-time PCR analysis.

References

  1. Ahemad M, Saghir MK (2011) Functional aspects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: recent advancements. Insight Microbiol 1:39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alikhani HA, Yakhchali B (2009) Potential use of Iranian rhizobial strains as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and effects of selected strains on growth characteristics of wheat, corn and alfalfa. Desert 14:27–35Google Scholar
  3. Anandham R, Gandhi PI, Madhaiyan M, Sa T (2008) Potential plant growth promoting traits and bioacidulation of rock phosphate by thiosulfate oxidizing bacteria isolated from crop plants. J Basic Microbiol 48:439–447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Aslantas R, Cakmakci R, Sahin F (2007) Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on young apples trees growth and fruit yield under orchard conditions. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 111:371–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avilán RL (2008) Nutrición y fertilización del mango. International Plant Nutrition Institute, NorcrossGoogle Scholar
  6. Axmann H, Sebastianelli A, Arrillaga LJ (1990) Sample preparation techniques of biological material for isotope analysis. In: Hardarson G (ed) Use of nuclear techniques in studies of soil-plant relationship. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, p 146Google Scholar
  7. Blaikie SJ, Leonardi J, Chacko EK, Muller WJ, Scott NS (1999) Effect of cincturing and chemical treatments on growth, flowering and yield of mango. Aust J Exp Agric 39:761–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradford M (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brito JMC, Ferreira D, Guerrero CAC, Machado AV, Beltrão J (1999) Soil pollution by nitrates using sewage sludge and mineral fertilizers. Dev Plant Soil Sci 86:223–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castro Marín I, Loef I, Bartetzko L, Searle I, Coupland G, Stitt M, Osuna D (2011) Nitrate regulates floral induction in Arabidopsis, acting independently of light, gibberellin and autonomous pathways. Planta 233:539–552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cavalcante VA, Dobereiner J (1988) A new acid-tolerant nitrogen-fixing bacterium associated with sugarcane. Plant Soil 108:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chacko EK (1991) Mango flowering—still an enigma. Acta Hort 291:12–21Google Scholar
  13. Compant S, Reiter B, Sessitch A, Nowak J, Clément C, Ait Barka E (2005) Endophytic colonization of Vitis vinifera L. by plant growth-promoting bacterium Burkholderia sp. strain PsJN. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1685–1693CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cull BW (1987) A whole plant approach to productivity research for mango. In: Prenseley RT, Tucker G (eds) Mangoes—a review. Commonwealth Science Council, London, pp 19–28Google Scholar
  15. Davenport TL (2003) Management of flowering in three tropical and subtropical fruit tree species. HortScience 38:1331–1335Google Scholar
  16. Davenport TL (2007) Reproductive physiology of mango. Braz J Plant Physiol 19:363–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davenport TL (2009) Reproductive physiology. In: Litz RE (ed) The mango: botany production and uses, 2nd edn. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 97–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davenport TL, Zhang T, Ying Z (2006a) Isolation of potentially regulating mango flowering. Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the Plant Growth Regulation Society of America, Quebec City, Canada, July 9–13, 2006. Plant Growth Regulation Society of America, Alexandria, pp 109–110Google Scholar
  19. Davenport TL, Ying Z, Kulkarni V, White TL (2006b) Evidence for a translocatable florigenic promoter in mango. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 110:150–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davies PJ (2004) The plant hormones: their nature, occurrence and function. In: Davies PJ (ed) Plant hormones: biosynthesis, signal transduction, action!, 3rd edn. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Amsterdam, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  21. de los Santos-Villalobos S, de-Folter S, Délano-Frier JP, Gómez-Lim MA, Guzmán-Ortiz DA, Sánchez-García P, Peña-Cabriales JJ (2011) Puntos críticos en el manejo integral de mango: floración, antracnosis y residuos industriales. Rev Mex Cienc Agríc 2:221–234Google Scholar
  22. de los Santos-Villalobos S, Barrera-Galicia GC, Miranda-Salcedo MA, Peña-Cabriales JJ (2012a) Burkholderia cepacia XXVI siderophore with biocontrol capacity against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:2615–2623CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. de los Santos-Villalobos S, Parra-Cota FI, de-Folter S, Peña-Cabriales JJ (2012b) Primers to amplify flowering locus T (FT) transcript in mango (Mangifera indica) and their potential use in other angiosperms. Plant OMICS 5:453–457Google Scholar
  24. de los Santos-Villalobos S, Guzmán-Ortiz DA, Gómez-Lim MA, Délano-Frier JP, de-Folter S, Sánchez-García P, Peña-Cabriales JJ (2013) Potential use of Trichoderma asperellum (Samuels, Liechfeldt et Nirenberg) T8a as a biological control agent against anthracnose in mango (Mangifera indica L.). Biol Control 64:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ercisli S, Esitken A, Cangi R, Sahin F (2003) Adventitious root formation of kiwifruit in relation to sampling date, IBA and Agrobacterium rubi inoculation. Plant Growth Regul 41:133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2009) FAOSTAT. http://faostat.fao.org/. Accessed 18 April 2012
  27. Glick BR, Penrose DM, Li J (1998) A model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth promoting bacteria. J Theor Biol 190:63–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Glickmann E, Dessaux Y (1995) A critical examination of the specificity of the Salkowski reagent for indolic compounds produced by phytopathogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:793–796PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gou J, Strauss SH, Tsai CJ, Fang K, Chen Y, Jiang X, Busov VB (2010) Gibberellins regulate lateral root formation in Populus through interactions with auxin and other hormones. Plant Cell 22:623–639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hegele M, Bangerth F, Naphrom D, Sruamsiri P, Manochai P (2006) Control of flower induction in tropical/subtropical fruit trees by phytohormones using the example of longan and mango. Acta Hortic 727:217–276Google Scholar
  31. Karadeniz A, Topcuoglu SF, Inan S (2006) Auxin, gibberellin, cytokinin and abscisic acid production in some bacteria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 22:1061–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Katiyar V, Goel R (2004) Siderophore mediated plant growth promotion at low temperature by mutant of fluorescent pseudomonad. Plant Growth Regul 42:239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kenworthy A (1964) Fruit nut and plantation crops. Desidues and everygreen (a guide collecting foliar sample for nutrient analysis). Horticultural Department. Michigan State University, East Lansing, p 30Google Scholar
  34. Kulkarni VJ, Rameshwar A (1989) Effect of deblossoming and defruiting on offseason flowering and fruiting in mango (Mangifera indica L.). Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 39:143–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu X, Grieve C (2009) Accumulation of chiro-inositol and other non-structural carbohydrates in Limonium species in response to saline irrigation waters. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 34:329–336Google Scholar
  36. Liu C, Thong Z, Yu H (2009) Coming into bloom: the specification of floral meristems. Development 136:3379–3391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using Real-Time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Maganhotto S, Silva CM, Faria Vieira R, Nicolella G (2003) Paclobutrazol effects on soil microorganisms. Appl Soil Ecol 22:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Magnani GS, Didonet CM, Cruz LM, Picheth CF, Pedrosa FO, Souza EM (2010) Diversity of endophytic bacteria in Brazilian sugarcane. Genet Mol Res 9:250–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Medeiros PM, Simoneita BRT (2007) Analysis of sugars in environmental samples by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1141:271–278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mia MAB, Shamsuddin ZH, Mahmood M (2010) Use of plant growth promoting bacteria in banana: a new insight for sustainable banana production. Int J Agric Biol 12:459–467Google Scholar
  42. Mortensen LM (1986) Effect of relative humidity on growth and flowering of some greenhouse plants. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 29:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mortley DG, Bonsi CK, Loretan PA, Hill WA, Morris CE (2000) High relative humidity increases yield, harvest index, flowering, and gynophore growth of hydroponically grown peanut plants. HortScience 35:46–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Muñoz-Fambuena N, Mesejo C, Gonzalez-Mas MC, Primo-Millo E, Agusti M, Iglesias DJ (2011) Fruit regulates seasonal expression of flowering genes in alternate-bearing ‘Moncada’ mandarin. Ann Bot 108:511–519CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Nakagawa M, Honsho C, Kanzaki S, Shimizu K, Utsunomiya N (2012) Isolation and expression analysis of flowering locus t-like and gibberellin metabolism genes in biennial-bearing mango trees. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 139:108–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nartvaranant P, Subhadrabandhu S, Tongumpai P (2000) Practical aspects in producing off-season mango in Thailand. Acta Hortic 509:661–668Google Scholar
  47. Niranjan Raj S, Chaluvaraju G, Amruthesh KN, Shetty HS, Reddy MS, Kloepper JW (2003) Induction of growth promotion and resistance against downy mildew on pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) by rhizobacteria. Plant Dis 87:380–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Noel A (1970) The girdled tree. Bot Rev 36:162–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Núñez-Eliséa R, Davenport TL (1994) Flowering of mango trees in containers as influenced by seasonal temperature and water stress. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 58:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Núñez-Eliséa R, Davenport TL (1995) Effect of leaf age, duration of cool temperature treatment, and photoperiod on bud dormancy release and floral initiation in mango. Sci Hortic 62:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pedraza RO (2008) Recent advances in nitrogen-fixing acetic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 125:25–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Pongsomboon W, Subhadrabandhu S, Stephenson RA (1997) Some aspects of the ecophysiology of flowering intensity of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Nam Dok Mai in a semi-tropical monsoon Asian climate. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 70:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Protacio CM (2000) A model for potassium nitrate-induced flowering in mango. Acta Hortic 509:545–552Google Scholar
  54. Protacio CM, Quinto JE, Serrano EP, Marquez IP, Rodriguez FM (2009) Unravelling the mechanism of mango flowering. Acta Hortic 820:259–270Google Scholar
  55. Putterill J, Laurie R, Macknight R (2004) It’s time to flower: the genetic control of flowering time. Bioassays 26:363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rademacher W (1991) Inhibitors of gibberellin biosynthesis: applications in agriculture and horticulture. In: Takahashi N, Phinney BO, MacMillan J (eds) Gibberellins. Springer, Berlin, pp 296–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ramírez F, Davenport TL (2010) Mango (Mangifera indica L.) flowering physiology. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 126:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ramírez F, Davenport TL (2012a) Reproductive biology (physiology)—the case of mango. In: Valavi SG, Rajmohan K, Govil JN, Peter KV, Thottappilly G (eds) Mango volume 1: production and processing technology. Studium Press LLC, Houston, pp 56–81Google Scholar
  59. Ramírez F, Davenport TL (2012b) Mangoes in Colombia. In: Valavi SG, Rajmohan K, Govil JN, Peter KV, Thottappilly G (eds) Mango volume 2: cultivation in different countries. Studium Press LLC, Houston, pp 346–358Google Scholar
  60. Ramírez F, Davenport TL, Fischer G (2010a) The number of leaves required for floral induction and translocation of the florigenic promoter in mango (Mangifera indica L.) in a tropical climate. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 123:443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ramírez F, Davenport TL, Fischer G, Pinzón JCA (2010b) The stem age required for floral induction of synchronized mango trees in the tropics. HortScience 45:1453–1458Google Scholar
  62. Requena N, Jimenez I, Toro M, Barea JM (1997) Interactions between plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium spp. in the rhizosphere of Anthyllis cytisoides, a model legume for revegetation in Mediterranean semi-arid ecosystems. New Phytol 136:667–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Saharan BS, Nehra V (2011) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: a critical review. Life Sci Med Res 21:1–30Google Scholar
  64. Searle C, Whiley AW, Simpson DR, Saranah JB (1995) A preliminary phenophysiological model for ‘Kensington’ mango in subtropical Australia. Mango 2000—marketing seminar and production workshop proceedings. Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane, pp 127–135Google Scholar
  65. Shaban AEA (2009) Vegetative growth cycles of some mango cultivars in relation to flowering and fruiting. World J Agric Sci 5:751–759Google Scholar
  66. Shahab S, Ahmed N, Nasreen SK (2009) Indole acetic acid production and enhanced plant growth promotion by indigenous PSBs. Afr J Agr Res 4:1312–1316Google Scholar
  67. Sharma D, Awasthi MD (2005) Uptake of soil applied paclobutrazol in mango (Mangifera indica L.) and its persistence in fruit and soil. Chemosphere 60:164–169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Singh RK, Ali SA, Nath P, Sane VA (2011) Activation of ethylene-responsive p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase leads to increased tocopherol levels during ripening in mango. J Exp Bot 62:3375–3385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. SMN (2002) Servicio Meteorológico Nacional. http://smn.cna.gob.mx/. Accessed 15 Jan 2013)
  70. Taub DR, Lerdau MT (2000) Relationship between leaf nitrogen and photosynthetic rate for three NAD-ME and three NADP-ME C4 grasses. Am J Bot 87:412–417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Tolley-Henry L, Raper CD Jr (1986) Expansion and photosynthetic rate of leaves of soybean plants during onset of and recovery from nitrogen stress. Bot Gaz 147:400–406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Turnbull C (2011) Long-distance regulation of flowering time. J Exp Bot 62:4399–4413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Turnbull CGN, Anderson KL, Winston EC (1996) Influence of gibberellin treatment on flowering and fruiting patterns in mango. Aust J Exp Agr 36:603–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ubeda-Tomás S, Federici F, Casimiro I, Beemster GT, Bhalerao R, Swarup R, Doerner P, Haseloff J, Bennett MJ (2009) Gibberellin signaling in the endodermis controls Arabidopsis root meristem size. Curr Biol 19:1194–1199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Urban L, Alphonsout L (2007) Girdling decreases photosynthetic electron fluxes and induces sustained photoprotection in mango leaves. Tree Physiol 27:345–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Vázquez-Valdivia V, Pérez-Barraza MH, Osuna-García JA (2009) Effect of gibberellic acid on flowering of ‘Ataulfo’ mangos. Acta Hortic 820:413–418Google Scholar
  77. Verma JP, Yadav J, Tiwari KN, Lavakush SV (2010) Impact of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on crop production. Int J Agric Res 5:954–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Viterbo A, Landau U, Kim S, Chernin L, Chet I (2010) Characterization of ACC deaminase from the biocontrol and plant growth-promoting agent Trichoderma asperellum T203. FEMS Microbiol Lett 305:42–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ (1991) 16S Ribosomal DNA Amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173:697–703PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Yedidia I, Benhamou N, Chet I (1999) Induction of defense responses in cucumber plants (Cucumis sativus L.) by the biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1061–1070PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Yeshitela T, Robbertse PJ, Stassen PJC (2004) Paclobutrazol suppressed vegetative growth and improved yield as well as fruit quality of ‘Tommy Atkins’ mango (Mangifera indica) in Ethiopia. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci 32:281–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergio de los Santos-Villalobos
    • 1
  • Stefan de Folter
    • 2
  • John P. Délano-Frier
    • 1
  • Miguel A. Gómez-Lim
    • 1
  • Doralinda A. Guzmán-Ortiz
    • 1
  • Juan J. Peña-Cabriales
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados-IPN (CINVESTAV)IrapuatoMexico
  2. 2.Laboratorio Nacional de Genómica para la Biodiversidad (LANGEBIO)IrapuatoMexico

Personalised recommendations