Journal of Plant Growth Regulation

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 166–174 | Cite as

Benzyladenine Treatment Significantly Increases the Seed Yield of the Biofuel Plant Jatropha curcas

  • Bang-Zhen Pan
  • Zeng-Fu Xu
Open Access


Jatropha curcas, a monoecious perennial biofuel shrub belonging to the family Euphorbiaceae, has few female flowers, which is one of the most important reasons for its poor seed yield. This study was undertaken to determine the effects of the plant growth regulator 6-benzyladenine (BA) on floral development and floral sex determination of J. curcas. Exogenous application of BA significantly increased the total number of flowers per inflorescence, reaching a 3.6-fold increase (from 215 to 784) at 160 mg/l of BA. Furthermore, BA treatments induced bisexual flowers, which were not found in control inflorescences, and a substantial increase in the female-to-male flower ratio. Consequently, a 4.5-fold increase in fruit number and a 3.3-fold increase in final seed yield were observed in inflorescences treated with 160 mg/L of BA, which resulted from the greater number of female flowers and the newly induced bisexual flowers in BA-treated inflorescences. This study indicates that the seed yield of J. curcas can be increased by manipulation of floral development and floral sex expression.


6-Benzyladenine Bisexual Cytokinin Female flowers Physic nut Sex determination 


Jatropha curcas (hereafter refer as Jatropha) is a perennial deciduous shrub belonging to the family Euphorbiaceae, which probably originated in Central America and is widely distributed in the tropics and subtropics (Fairless 2007; Carels 2009; Makkar and Becker 2009). Jatropha seed content is about 30–40% oil, which is an ideal feedstock for producing biodiesel (Kandpal and Madan 1995; Fairless 2007; Jongschaap and others 2007; Sunil and others 2008). At present, however, seed yield of Jatropha is poor and insufficient for the biodiesel industry (Sanderson 2009; Divakara and others 2010).

As a cross-pollinated shrub, Jatropha is monoecious and produces male and female flowers in the same inflorescence (Heller 1996; Liu and others 2008). Normally, female flowers initiate at the center of inflorescences and are surrounded by a group of male flowers (Jongschaap and others 2007). Occasionally bisexual (hermaphrodite) flowers occur (Dehgan and Webster 1979). Each Jatropha inflorescence is composed of 100–300 flowers and yields approximately 10 or more ovoid fruits (Kumar and Sharma 2008; Rao and others 2008; and this study). One of the most likely reasons for poor yield is that Jatropha has few female flowers resulting from a very low female-to-male flower ratio, which, depending on the genotype, is about 1:29–1:13 (Raju and Ezradanam 2002; Tewari and others 2007). Thus, increasing the number of female flowers seems critical for the improvement of Jatropha seed yield.

Studies of exogenous applications of various plant growth regulators (PGRs) and analysis of endogenous phytohormones showed that PGRs play important roles in floral development (Krizek and Fletcher 2005; Irish 2009; Santner and others 2009). Exogenous cytokinin (CK) application has been shown to increase inflorescence meristem activity and promote floral initiation in several species (Wang and Li 2008; Werner and Schmulling 2009; Kiba and Sakakibara 2010). Srinivasan and Mullins (1978, 1979) reported that the tendrils of grape (Vitis vinifera) were converted into inflorescences by application of various CKs. Ohkawa (1979) found that 6-benzyladenine (BA, a synthetic compound with CK activity) treatment had a significant influence on increasing flower numbers of Lilium speciosum, particularly when combined with gibberellins A4 and A7 (GA4 + 7). Chen (1991) showed that flower bud differentiation of lychee (Litchi chinensis) was significantly promoted by exogenous kinetin application after bud dormancy. The total number of flowers on jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis) was also significantly increased by treatment with BA (Ravetta and Palzkill 1992; Prat and others 2008). Recently, Li and others (2010) reported that the flower-specific elevation of cytokinin through transgenic expression of an Arabidopsis cytokinin biosynthesis enzyme gene (ATP/ADP isopentenyltransferase 4, AtIPT4) under the control of the APETALA1 (AP1) promoter led to a threefold increase of flowers in the transgenic plants.

PGRs are also important regulators of floral sex determination, which depends on the plant species (Khryanin 2002, 2007; Xiong and others 2009). CK has been shown to have a feminizing effect on a number of plant species (Khryanin 2002, 2007). For example, CK induced bisexual (hermaphroditic) flowers of grape (Vitis vinifera) (Negi and Olmo 1966, 1972) and also female flowers of Luffa acutangula (Bose and Nitsch 1970) and Luffa cylindrical (Takahashi and others 1980).

To find ways to increase the total number and/or the proportion of female flowers of Jatropha, which may result in increased seed yield, we investigated the effects of exogenous applications of 6-benzyladenine (BA) on the flower, fruit, and seed development of Jatropha.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

One-year-old plants of Jatropha curcas L. were grown in a field with normal fertilization at the Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (XTBG, 21°54′ N, 101°46′ E, 580 m in altitude) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences located in Mengla County, Yunnan Province, southwest China. Plants were monocultured at a density of 2.5 × 2.5 m. The annual rainfall, temperature, and relative humidity records at the XTBG were 1493 mm, 21.8°C and 85%, respectively. The experiments were carried out from April (when the plants were 1 year old) to November 2009.

6-Benzyladenine (BA) Application

A stock solution (25 mg/ml) of 6-benzyladenine (BA, Bio Basic Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada) was prepared by dissolving 1 g of BA in 5 ml of 1 N NaOH and bringing the final volume to 40 ml with distilled water. Tween-20 (Polysorbate-20, Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology & Services Co., Ltd., China) was added at the final concentration of 0.05% (v/v) as a wetting agent to all BA working solutions. Five milliliters of BA working solutions of various concentrations (80, 160, and 320 mg/l) were sprayed on each inflorescence (about 0.5 cm in diameter) and on surrounding leaves using a hand sprayer. Control inflorescences were sprayed with 5 ml of distilled water containing 0.05% (v/v) Tween-20. Spraying was consecutively conducted three times at 1-day intervals. Thirty inflorescences from 10 plants were used for each treatment.

The total number and number of each sex of flowers per inflorescence, fruits per inflorescence, and seeds per fruit were counted. A female flower was defined as a flower with pistils only, a male flower was defined as a flower with stamens only, bisexual flowers were defined as flowers with both pistils and stamens, and an asexual flower was defined as a flower with neither pistils nor stamens. The fruiting rate (%) was calculated as the number of fruits divided by the number of female and bisexual flowers.

Characterization of Seeds

After being air-dried for 2 months, weight, size, and oil content of seeds from control and BA-treated plants were measured. Seed oil contents were determined by the minispec mq-one Seed Analyzer (Bruker Optik GmbH, Germany). A calibration curve was obtained from reference samples of oil extracted from Jatropha seeds.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using the Statistical Product and Service Solution version 16.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Differences among means were determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s or Tamhane’s post hoc tests. Graphics were generated using SigmaPlot version 10.0) (Systat Software, Inc., Point Richmond, CA).


Effects of BA on Jatropha Flower Development

BA treatment significantly increased the total number of flowers per inflorescence compared to the control (Fig. 1a, b, 2a). BA treatment at 160 mg/l resulted in a 3.6-fold increase (from 215 to 784) in flowers per inflorescence (Fig. 2a). We found that in addition to the normal male and female flowers found in control inflorescences (Fig. 1c, d), bisexual and asexual flowers were induced in BA-treated inflorescences (Fig. 1e, f). The number and percentage of flowers of different sex types of Jatropha treated with various concentrations of BA are shown in Fig. 2. Up to 3.09% of flowers in inflorescences treated with 320 mg/l of BA were bisexual flowers (Fig. 2b), which were not found in control inflorescences.
Fig. 1

Effects of BA treatments on flower development and sex expression of Jatropha. a Inflorescence from control plants. b Inflorescence from BA-treated plants. c-f Flowers of different sexual types from BA-treated plants. c Male flower. d Female flower. e Induced bisexual flower. f Induced asexual flower

Fig. 2

a Effects of BA treatments on flower number of different sex types per inflorescence. b Effects of BA treatments on percentage of flowers of different sex types. Values are means ± standard deviations (n = 30 inflorescences). ** Statistically significant at the 1% level

Furthermore, interestingly, BA treatments induced a substantial increase in the total number and the proportion of female flowers (Fig. 2). The percentage of female flowers was proportional to the concentration of BA treatment. Female flowers accounted for 29.99% of total flowers in inflorescences treated with 320 mg/l of BA, but only for 6.96% in control inflorescences (Fig. 2b). The female:male ratio was increased from 1:13.4 in control inflorescence to 1:2.4 in inflorescence treated with 320 mg/l of BA (Table 1), resulting in a 4.3-fold increase in percentage of female flowers. The inflorescences treated with 160 mg/l of BA produced the greatest numbers of total flowers (784) and female flowers (156), in contrast to the control inflorescences in which only 15 female flowers were found among a total of 215 flowers (Fig. 2a).
Table 1

Effects of BA treatments on flower number and sex ratio in Jatropha

BA treatments



F:M ratio


14.96 ± 4.96

200.11 ± 51.92


80 mg/l

62.26 ± 34.41*

448.04 ± 199.84*


160 mg/l

156.00 ± 43.10*

620.07 ± 184.66*


320 mg/l

138.16 ± 60.56*

333.24 ± 176.34*


Values are mean ± standard deviation (n = 30 inflorescences)

* Statistically different from the control at 1% level

Effects of BA on Fruiting and Seed Development

As expected, many more female flowers and newly induced bisexual flowers in BA-treated inflorescences produced more fruits than the control inflorescences (Fig. 3a, b). In comparison with the control inflorescences, a 4.5-fold increase in fruit number (from 13 to 58 per inflorescence) was observed in inflorescences treated with 160 mg/l of BA (Fig. 3c, Table 2). The fruiting rates, however, were decreased in all inflorescences treated with 80–320 mg/l of BA (Fig. 3c). Linear regression analysis revealed a significantly negative correlation between fruiting rate and the number of female and bisexual flowers per inflorescence on plants treated with BA but not in control plants (Fig. 4), which may be a result of either the limited space in the inflorescence or the shortage of photosynthesis products (Gifford and Evans 1981; Sutherland 1986).
Fig. 3

a Infructescence from control plants. b Infructescence from BA-treated plants. c Effects of BA treatments on fruit number per infructescence and fruiting rate. Values are means ± standard deviations (n = 30 infructescence). Fruit number and fruiting rate of all treatments were statistically different from the control at the 1% level

Table 2

Effects of BA treatments on fruit and seed characteristics and oil content of Jatropha

BA treatments



Weight/seed (g)

Seed yield/infructescence (g)

Oil content (%)


12.92 ± 4.33

2.42 ± 0.38

0.77 ± 0.08

24.10 ± 10.14

31.67 ± 2.92

80 mg/l

32.88 ± 17.15**

2.25 ± 0.34

0.64 ± 0.10**

43.22 ± 23.82*

32.51 ± 3.09

160 mg/l

58.04 ± 12.09**

2.34 ± 0.99

0.64 ± 0.03**

78.58 ± 16.41**

34.76 ± 1.46**

320 mg/l

54.04 ± 25.94**

2.04 ± 0.44

0.67 ± 0.06**

68.23 ± 35.44**

32.13 ± 2.54

Values are mean ± standard deviation (n = 30 inflorescences)

* Statistically different from the control at 5% level

** Statistically different from the control at 1% level

Fig. 4

Linear regression of fruiting rate versus the number of female and bisexual flowers per inflorescence of Jatropha. a Control. b BA treatment at 80 mg/l. c BA treatment at 160 mg/l. d BA treatment at 320 mg/l

Although a low percentage of fruits contain one to two seeds, we found that most Jatropha fruit contains three seeds (Fig. 5a), in agreement with the fact that Jatropha female flowers usually have a three-locular ovary (Heller 1996; Divakara and others 2010). It is rare to find four-seed fruits in our experimental site under normal growth conditions, although they have been observed in some Mexican genotypes (Makkar and others 2008; Makkar and Becker 2009). The BA-treated inflorescences, however, produced four-seed fruits (Fig. 5b), and the number of four-seed fruits increased with the concentration of BA from 80 to 320 mg/l, reaching 2.0% of total fruits at 320 mg/l (data not shown). Because more one-seed and two-seed fruits were found in BA-treated inflorescences than in the controls, the average seed number per fruit in the BA-treated inflorescences was slightly, but not statistically significantly, less than that of control inflorescences (Table 2).
Fig. 5

Normal 3-seed fruit (a) and BA-induced 4-seed fruit (b)

Although BA treatment produced many more flowers and fruits, seeds from the BA-treated fruits were slightly lighter (Table 2) and smaller (Table 3) than those from control fruits. The final seed yield per inflorescence was increased by 1.8-fold (BA at 80 mg/l) up to 3.3-fold (BA at 160 mg/l) (Table 2). Unexpectedly, the oil content of the seeds significantly increased from 31.7% (control seeds) to 34.8% (BA-treated at 160 mg/l) (Table 2).
Table 3

Effects of BA treatments on seed size of Jatropha

BA treatment

Width (mm)

Height (mm)

Length (mm)


8.83 ± 0.18

11.19 ± 0.22

18.80 ± 0.35

80 mg/l

8.59 ± 0.46*

10.85 ± 0.34**

17.54 ± 0.78**

160 mg/l

8.43 ± 0.20**

10.80 ± 0.19**

17.07 ± 0.58**

320 mg/l

8.79 ± 0.38

10.95 ± 0.25**

17.61 ± 0.47**

Nine hundred seeds of each treatment were analyzed in the experiment. Values are mean ± standard deviation

* Statistically different from the control at 5% level

** Statistically different from the control at 1% level


Floral development and floral sex determination are critical for optimizing seed yields of monoecious plants. Our data presented in this article clearly show that exogenous application of BA significantly promotes floral development and feminizing effects in Jatropha. BA treatment significantly increased seed yield per inflorescence of Jatropha by increasing the total number of flowers and the proportion of female flowers and the induction of bisexual flowers.

Accumulating evidence suggests that the BA-induced increase in the number of flowers may result from the positive role of cytokinin in the regulation of inflorescence meristem activity and size (Werner and Schmulling 2009; Kiba and Sakakibara 2010). Werner and others (2001, 2003) found that CK-deficient transgenic tobacco and Arabidopsis plants overexpressing Arabidopsis CK oxidase/dehydrogenase (AtCKX, an enzyme-degrading CK) genes developed a reduced number of flowers on each single inflorescence. Consistently, Ashikari and others (2005) found that a quantitative trait locus (QTL) controlling grain number in rice, Gn1a, is a gene for CK oxidase/dehydrogenase (OsCKX2). Reduced expression of OsCKX2 resulted from natural mutations or antisense inhibition of OsCKX2, caused CK accumulation in inflorescence meristems, and increased grain number per plant, whereas transgenic plants overexpressing OsCKX2 showed reduced grain numbers compared to control plants (Ashikari and others 2005). On the other hand, a loss-of-function mutation of the rice LONELY GUY (LOG) gene encoding a CK-activating enzyme that works in the final step of bioactive cytokinin synthesis resulted in a significant decrease in floral organ numbers (Kurakawa and others 2007). Also, Li and others (2010) reported that transgenic expression of an Arabidopsis CK biosynthetic enzyme gene (AtIPT4) led to an increase in the number of flowers, which was correlated with enlarged inflorescences and flower meristems.

Another interesting observation in the present study was that the exogenous application of BA resulted in the induction of bisexual flowers and a significantly increased proportion of female flowers of Jatropha. This result is in line with the previous observations in other plant species. Negi and Olmo (1966, 1972) showed that application of a synthetic cytokinin [6-(benzylamino)-9-(2-tetrahydropyranyl)- 9H-purine, PBA] to flower clusters of a male grapevine completely converted the flower sex from male to bisexual (hermaphrodite). Takahashi and others (1980) found that direct application of BA to the staminate inflorescence induced bisexual and pistillate flowers in Luffa cylindrica. In addition, BA was also found to promote the formation of female flowers in Momordica charantia (Ghosh and Basu 1982) and to induce the lateral female and bisexual strobili in the lower part of new shoots of Japanese red pine (Wakushima and others 1996).

Sex determination in unisexual flowers is a complicated process that is achieved by selectively arresting or aborting pistil or stamen development within a bisexual floral meristem (Lebel-Hardenack and Grant 1997; Tanurdzic and Banks 2004; Irish 2005; Liu and others 2008). A number of studies have shown that phytohormones play a pivotal role in the process of the selective arrest or abortion of pistils or stamens in female and male flowers, respectively (Khryanin 2002; Irish 2009; Santner and others 2009). The availability of GAs plays an essential role in the expression of feminizing An1 (Anther earl) and D (Dwarf) genes in maize flowers (Dellaporta and Calderon-Urrea 1994; Irish 2005). In cucumber, ethylene is the key hormone involved in sex determination (Yamasaki and others 2003; Wang and others 2010). The expression of two genes, CS-ACS1 and CS-ACS2, encoding the ethylene biosynthetic enzymes (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase), correlated with sexual phenotypes (Trebitsh and others 1997; Yamasaki and others 2001). Recently, Martin and others (2009) proposed an integrated model of sex determination in melon plants in which the andromonoecious gene CmACS-7, encoding an ethylene biosynthesis enzyme (Boualem and others 2008), and the gynoecious gene CmWIP1, encoding a zinc-finger transcription factor, interact to control the development of male, female, and hermaphrodite flowers. The expression of the pistil repressor CmWIP1 causes the arrest of carpel development and the repression of the expression of the stamen repressor CmACS-7, leading to the formation of male flowers. The inactivation of CmWIP1 by promoter hypermethylation, which also indirectly leads to the activation of CmACS-7, permits the development of female flowers. Hermaphrodite flowers resulted from CmWIP1 repression and the presence of a nonfunctional CmACS-7 gene (Boualem and others 2008; Martin and others 2009). These results demonstrated that genes encoding metabolic enzymes for different phytohormones and the related transcription factors play important roles in the sex determination of various plant species.

In contrast to a 3.3-fold increase in seed yield of Jatropha by BA treatment at 160 mg/l in this study (Table 2), the higher concentration of BA at 3–12 mM (equivalent to 676–2703 mg/l) was not much more effective compared to the untreated control (Abdelgadir and others 2009, 2010). These results suggest the critical importance of the concentration of BA in the improvement of seed yield of Jatropha. Because the significant effects of BA treatments on seed yield of Jatropha reported here were at the level of inflorescences, and the effects may not be significant due to the possible autoregulation of the allocation of photosynthetic products at the levels of trees and/or hectares, we are currently investigating the effectiveness of BA treatments at these levels. Preliminary data showed that there was more than a threefold increase in seed yield per Jatropha tree (data not shown). Further studies are necessary to provide direct evidence of the important roles for endogenous CKs in the floral development and sex determination of Jatropha, based on which genes encoding key enzymes in CK metabolism (Zhao 2008; Werner and Schmulling 2009; Kudo and others 2010) in Jatropha could be cloned and used for metabolic engineering of CK in Jatropha inflorescence meristem (Ma 2008; Kiba and Sakakibara 2010). Recently, Ghosh and others (2010) also found an unexpected 5- to 11-fold increase in Jatropha seed yield in the year following a soil application of paclobutrazol, a biosynthesis inhibitor of the plant hormone gibberellin. These studies indicate great potential for improvement in Jatropha seed yield by the application of plant growth regulators, and further genetic improvements through traditional breeding techniques and molecular approaches may be possible (Divakara and others 2010). In addition, other PGRs may also be explored to induce synchronous flowering and fruit maturation (Luckwill 1977; Bonnetmasimbert and Zaerr 1987; Santner and others 2009), which may facilitate mechanical harvesting of Jatropha fruits (Carels 2009; King and others 2009).



We acknowledge Mr. Maosheng Chen for help in designing the experiment; Dr. Jin Chen for great support; and Jingxue Pi, Jun Ni, Mingyong Tang, and Zhiyu Pu for help in the field. This work was supported by the Knowledge Innovation Programs of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant Nos. KSCX2-YW-Z-0723, KSCX2-YW-G-027, and KSCX2-YW-G-035-1) and the Top Science and Technology Talents Scheme of Yunnan province (grant No. 2009CI123).

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.


  1. Abdelgadir H, Johnson S, Van Staden J (2009) Effect of foliar application of plant growth regulators on flowering and fruit set in Jatropha curcas—a potential oil seed crop for biodiesel. S Afr J Bot 75:391Google Scholar
  2. Abdelgadir HA, Jager AK, Johnson SD, Van Staden J (2010) Influence of plant growth regulators on flowering, fruiting, seed oil content, and oil quality of Jatropha curcas. S Afr J Bot 76:440–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashikari M, Sakakibara H, Lin SY, Yamamoto T, Takashi T, Nishimura A, Angeles ER, Qian Q, Kitano H, Matsuoka M (2005) Cytokinin oxidase regulates rice grain production. Science 309:741–745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonnetmasimbert M, Zaerr JB (1987) The role of plant-growth regulators in promotion of flowering. Plant Growth Regul 6:13–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bose TK, Nitsch JP (1970) Chemical alteration of sex expression in Luffa acutangula. Physiol Plant 23:201–206Google Scholar
  6. Boualem A, Fergany M, Fernandez R, Troadec C, Martin A, Morin H, Sari MA, Collin F, Flowers JM, Pitrat M, Purugganan MD, Dogimont C, Bendahmane A (2008) A conserved mutation in an ethylene biosynthesis enzyme leads to andromonoecy in melons. Science 321:836–838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carels N (2009) Jatropha curcas: a review. In: Kader JC, Delseny M (eds) Advances in botanical research. Academic Press, New York, pp 39–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen W (1991) Changes in cytokinins before and during early flower bud differentiation in lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn.). Plant Physiol 96:1203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dehgan B, Webster GL (1979) Morphology and infrageneric relationships of the genus Jatropha (Euphorbiaceae). U Calif Publ Bot 74:1–73Google Scholar
  10. Dellaporta SL, Calderon-Urrea A (1994) The sex determination process in maize. Science 266:1501–1505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Divakara BN, Upadhyaya HD, Wani SP, Gowda CLL (2010) Biology and genetic improvement of Jatropha curcas L.: A review. Appl Energy 87:732–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fairless D (2007) The little shrub that could—maybe. Nature 449:652–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghosh S, Basu P (1982) Effect of some growth regulators on sex expression of Momordica charantia L. Sci Hortic 17:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghosh A, Chikara J, Chaudhary D, Prakash A, Boricha G, Zala A (2010) Paclobutrazol arrests vegetative growth and unveils unexpressed yield potential of Jatropha curcas. J. Plant Growth Regul 29:307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gifford RM, Evans LT (1981) Photosynthesis, carbon partitioning, and yield. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 32:485–509Google Scholar
  16. Heller J (1996) Physic nut Jatropha curcas L. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. 1. Gatersleben: Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, RomeGoogle Scholar
  17. Irish E (2005) Regulation of sex determination in maize. Bioessays 18:363–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Irish V (2009) The flowering of Arabidopsis flower development. Plant J 61:1014–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jongschaap R, Corré W, Bindraban P, Brandenburg W (2007) Claims and facts on Jatropha curcas L. Global Jatropha curcas evaluation, breeding and propagation programme. Report 158. Plant Research International BV, Wageningen, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  20. Kandpal JB, Madan M (1995) Jatropha curcus—a renewable source of energy for meeting future energy needs. Renew Energ 6:159–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khryanin VN (2002) Role of phytohormones in sex differentiation in plants. Russ J Plant Physiol 49:545–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khryanin VN (2007) Evolution of the pathways of sex differentiation in plants. Russ J Plant Physiol 54:845–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kiba T, Sakakibara H (2010) Role of cytokinin in the regulation of plant development. In: Pua EC, Davey MR (eds) Plant developmental biology-biotechnological perspectives. Springer, New York, pp 237–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. King AJ, He W, Cuevas JA, Freudenberger M, Ramiaramanana D, Graham IA (2009) Potential of Jatropha curcas as a source of renewable oil and animal feed. J Exp Bot 60:2897–2905PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krizek B, Fletcher J (2005) Molecular mechanisms of flower development: an armchair guide. Nat Rev Genet 6:688–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kudo T, Kiba T, Sakakibara H (2010) Metabolism and long-distance translocation of cytokinins. J Integr Plant Biol 52:53–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumar A, Sharma S (2008) An evaluation of multipurpose oil seed crop for industrial uses (Jatropha curcas L.): a review. Ind Crop Prod 28:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kurakawa T, Ueda N, Maekawa M, Kobayashi K, Kojima M, Nagato Y, Sakakibara H, Kyozuka J (2007) Direct control of shoot meristem activity by a cytokinin-activating enzyme. Nature 445:652–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lebel-Hardenack S, Grant SR (1997) Genetics of sex determination in flowering plants. Trends Plant Sci 2:130–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li X, Su Y, Zhao X, Li W, Gao X, Zhang X (2010) Cytokinin overproduction-caused alteration of flower development is partially mediated by CUC2 and CUC3 in Arabidopsis. Gene 450:109–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu H, Deng Y, Liao J (2008) Floral organogenesis of three species of Jatropha (Euphorbiaceae). J Syst Evol 46:53–61Google Scholar
  32. Luckwill LC (1977) Growth regulators in flowering and fruit development. In: Plimmer JR (ed) Pesticide chemistry in the 20th Century, ACS Symp Ser 37. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ma Q (2008) Genetic engineering of cytokinins and their application to agriculture. Crit Rev Biotechnol 28:213–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Makkar HRS, Becker K (2009) Jatropha curcas, a promising crop for the generation of biodiesel and value-added coproducts. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 111:773–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Makkar H, Martínez-Herrera J, Becker K (2008) Variations in seed number per fruit, seed physical parameters and contents of oil, protein and phorbol ester in toxic and non-toxic genotypes of Jatropha curcas. J Plant Sci 3:260–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin A, Troadec C, Boualem A, Rajab M, Fernandez R, Morin H, Pitrat M, Dogimont C, Bendahmane A (2009) A transposon-induced epigenetic change leads to sex determination in melon. Nature 461:1135–1138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Negi S, Olmo H (1966) Sex conversion in a male Vitis vinifera L. by a kinin. Sciences 152:1624–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Negi SS, Olmo HP (1972) Certain embryological and biochemical aspects of cytokinin SD 8339 in converting sex of a male Vitis vinifera (Sylvestris). Am J Bot 59:851–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ohkawa K (1979) Effects of gibberellins and benzyladenine on dormancy and flowering of Lilium speciosum. Sci Hortic 10:255–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prat L, Botti C, Fichet T (2008) Effect of plant growth regulators on floral differentiation and seed production in Jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis (Link) Schneider). Ind Crop Prod 27:44–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Raju AJS, Ezradanam V (2002) Pollination ecology and fruiting behaviour in a monoecious species, Jatropha curcas L. (Euphorbiaceae). Curr Sci 83:1395–1398Google Scholar
  42. Rao G, Korwar G, Shanker A, Ramakrishna Y (2008) Genetic associations, variability and diversity in seed characters, growth, reproductive phenology and yield in Jatropha curcas (L.) accessions. Trees-Struct Funct 22:697–709Google Scholar
  43. Ravetta D, Palzkill D (1992) The effect of growth regulators and apex removal on branching and flower bud production of jojoba. Ind Crop Prod 1:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sanderson K (2009) Wonder weed plans fail to flourish. Nature 461:328–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Santner A, Calderon-Villalobos LIA, Estelle M (2009) Plant hormones are versatile chemical regulators of plant growth. Nat Chem Biol 5:301–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Srinivasan C, Mullins M (1978) Control of flowering in the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): formation of inflorescences in vitro by isolated tendrils. Plant Physiol 61:127–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Srinivasan C, Mullins M (1979) Flowering in Vitis: conversion of tendrils into inflorescences and bunches of grapes. Planta 145:187–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sunil N, Varaprasad KS, Sivaraj N, Kumar TS, Abraham B, Prasad RBN (2008) Assessing Jatropha curcas L. germplasm in-situ—a case study. Biomass Bioenerg 32:198–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sutherland S (1986) Floral sex ratios, fruit-set, and resource allocation in plants. Ecology 67:991–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Takahashi H, Suge H, Saito T (1980) Sex expression as affected by N6-benzylaminopurine in staminate inflorescence of Luffa cylindrica. Plant Cell Physiol 21:525–536Google Scholar
  51. Tanurdzic M, Banks J (2004) Sex-determining mechanisms in land plants. Plant Cell Online 16:S61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tewari JP, Dwivedi HD, Pathak M, Srivastava SK (2007) Incidence of a mosaic disease in Jatropha curcas L. from eastern Uttar Pradesh. Curr Sci 93:1048–1049Google Scholar
  53. Trebitsh T, Staub JE, O’Neill SD (1997) Identification of a 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase gene linked to the female (F) locus that enhances female sex expression in cucumber. Plant Physiol 113:987–995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wakushima S, Yoshioka H, Sakurai N (1996) Lateral female strobili production in a Japanese red pine (Pinus densiflora Sieb. Et Zucc.) clone by exogenous cytokinin application. J Forest Res 1:143–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang YH, Li JY (2008) Molecular basis of plant architecture. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:253–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang DH, Li F, Duan QH, Han T, Xu ZH, Bai SN (2010) Ethylene perception is involved in female cucumber flower development. Plant J 61:862–872PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Werner T, Schmulling T (2009) Cytokinin action in plant development. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:527–538PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Werner T, Motyka V, Strnad M, Schmlulling T (2001) Regulation of plant growth by cytokinin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10487–10492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Werner T, Motyka V, Laucou V, Smets R, Van Onckelen H, Schmulling T (2003) Cytokinin-deficient transgenic Arabidopsis plants show multiple developmental alterations indicating opposite functions of cytokinins in the regulation of shoot and root meristem activity. Plant Cell 15:2532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Xiong G, Li J, Wang Y (2009) Advances in the regulation and crosstalks of phytohormones. Chinese Sci Bull 54:2718–2733Google Scholar
  61. Yamasaki S, Fujii N, Matsuura S, Mizusawa H, Takahashi H (2001) The M locus and ethylene-controlled sex determination in andromonoecious cucumber plants. Plant Cell Physiol 42:608–619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yamasaki S, Fujii N, Takahashi H (2003) Characterization of ethylene effects on sex determination in cucumber plants. Sex Plant Reprod 16:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhao Y (2008) The role of local biosynthesis of auxin and cytokinin in plant development. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:16–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Molecular Breeding of Energy PlantsXishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of SciencesKunmingChina
  2. 2.Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations