Carbon distribution strategy of Aurelia coerulea polyps in the strobilation process in relation to temperature and food supply
- 14 Downloads
Mass occurrences of moon jellyfish have been observed in coastal waters. Strobilation directly determines the initial population size of adult jellyfish, but energy distribution during the strobilation process is not well understood. In this study, strobilation was induced in polyp of Aurelia coerulea by elevating temperature. The different stages in the strobilation process, including polyp budding, strobilation and body growth, were investigated at six temperature levels (8, 10, 13, 15, 17 and 19°C) and five food supply levels (0, 30, 60, 100 and 150 μg C/L). The results showed that the duration of strobilation preparation stage (SP) remarkably decreased with increasing temperature. Food level positively affected the production of buds and ephyrae and the body growth of parent polyps. Of the six temperatures tested, 13°C was optimal for strobilation. At 13°C, strobilation activity was enhanced, and this treatment resulted in the greatest energy distribution, highest ephyrae production and longest duration of strobilation stage (SS). Polyps tended to allocate 6.58%–20.49% carbon to buds with sufficient food supply regardless of temperature. The body growth of parent polyps was highest at lower temperatures and higher food levels. This study is the first to provide information on carbon-based energy distribution strategy in the polyp strobilation process. We concluded that budding reproduction is a lower-risk strategy for A. coerulea polyps to increase populations. Even during strobilation season, polyps prioritize budding, but at the optimal strobilation temperature, polyps utilize a portion of the energy stored for budding to release ephyrae. The body carbon content of parent polyps may be considered as strategic energy reserves, which could help to support budding activities and strobilation during harsh conditions.
KeywordAurelia coerulea temperature food supply carbon distribution strategy strobilation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
We thank Ms. ZHANG Zhenghua for caring for the polyps. We are grateful to WANG Shiwei and WANG Pengpeng for help with sampling A. coerulea medusae. Editing services were provided by Wiley editing services.
- Chi X P, Javidpour J. 2016. Combined effects of food quality, food quantity and temperature on somatic growth, asexual reproduction and fatty acid composition of Aurelia aurita polyps. http://oceanrep.geomar.de/35045/1/5th%20 jellyfish%20bloom%20conference_poster_XCHI_JJ.pdf.Google Scholar
- Condon R H, Duarte C M, Pitt K A, Robinson K L, Lucas C H, Sutherland K R, Mianzan H W, Bogeberg M, Purcell J E, Decker M B, Uye S–i, Madin L P, Brodeur R D, Haddock S H D, Malej A, Parry G D, Eriksen E, Quiñones J, Acha M, Harvey M, Arthur J M, Graham W M. 2013. Recurrent jellyfish blooms are a consequence of global oscillations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110 (3): 1 000–1 005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ishii H, Ohba T, Kobayashi T. 2008. Effects of low dissolved oxygen on planula settlement, polyp growth and asexual reproduction of Aurelia aurita. Plankton and Benthos Research, 3 (S): 107–113.Google Scholar
- Lucas C H, Gelcich S, Uye S I. 2014. Living with jellyfish: Management and adaptation strategies. In: Pitt K, Lucas C eds. Jellyfish Blooms. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands. p.129–150.Google Scholar
- Miyake H, Iwao K, Kakinuma Y. 1997. Life history and environment of Aurelia aurita. South Pacific Study, 17 (2): 273–285.Google Scholar
- Möller H. 1980. Scyphomedusae as predators and food competitors of larval fish. Meeresforschung, 28: 1–17.Google Scholar
- Pascual M, Fuentes V, Canepa A, Atienza D, Gili J M, Purcell J E. 2015. Temperature effects on asexual reproduction of the scyphozoan Aurelia aurita s.l.: differences between exotic (Baltic and Red seas) and native (Mediterranean Sea) populations. Mar ine Ecology, 36 (4): 994–1 002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Russel F S. 1970. The Medusae of the British Isles. Vol. II. Pelagic Scyphozoa, with A Supplement to Vol. I. Cambridge University Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
- Shi Y, Yu Z G, Zhen Y, Wang G S, Wang X G, Mi T Z. 2017. Effect of decreasing temperature on the strobilation of Aurelia sp. 1. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343–017–6210–6.Google Scholar
- Sun M, Dong J, Fu Z L, Li Y L. 2012. The effect of light intensity on survival and growth of scyphistomae in jellyfish, Aurelia sp. 1. Fish eries Sci ence, 31 (4): 211–215. (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
- Thein H, Ikeda H, Uye S I. 2013. Ecophysiological characteristics of podocysts in Chrysaora pacifica (Goette) and Cyanea nozakii Kishinouye (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa: Semaeostomeae): effects of environmental factors on their production, dormancy and excystment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 446: 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Toyokawa M, Furota T, Terazaki M. 2000. Life history and seasonal abundance of Aurelia aurita medusae in Tokyo Bay, Japan. Plankton Biology and Ecology, 47 (1): 48–58.Google Scholar
- Vagelli A. 2007. New observations on the asexual reproduction of Aurelia aurita (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) with comments on its life cycle and adaptive significance. Invertebrate Zoology, 4 (2): 111–127.Google Scholar
- Wan A Y, Zhang G T. 2012. Annual occurrence of moon jellyfish Aurel i a sp. 1 in the Jiaozhou Bay and its impacts on zooplankton community. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 43 (3): 494–501. (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
- Wang B, Dong J, Wang W B, Li Y L, Liu X Z, Fu J. 2012. The quantity distribution of giant jellyfish and its relationship to seawater temperature and salinity in inshore waters of the northern Liaodong Bay region. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 43 (3): 568–578. (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
- Webster C N, Lucas C H. 2012. The effects of food and temperature on settlement of Aurelia aurita planula larvae and subsequent somatic growth. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 436–437: 50–55.Google Scholar