Advertisement

Journal of Oceanology and Limnology

, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 1941–1949 | Cite as

Antimony speciation at the sediment-water interface of the Poyang Lake: response to seasonal variation

  • Xiaoping Yu (余晓平)
  • Yafei Guo (郭亚飞)
  • Tianlong Deng (邓天龙)Email author
Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

In order to identify the effects of seasonal variation on the migration and transformation of antimony species at the sediment-water interface of the Poyang Lake, the largest fresh lake in China, a simulation study was carried out in the laboratory. Antimony species including antimonite Sb(III), antimonate Sb(V) and the fraction of organic forms (Sb-org) in overlying water at different temperatures were regularly measured during the simulation period. Different bound antimony forms in sediments were also determined along with the different antimony species in porewaters after the simulation terminated. The results indicated that temperature change during seasonal alternation plays an important role in the migration and transformation behavior of antimony at the sediment-water interface of the Poyang Lake. Antimony species both in porewaters and overlying water were sensitive to the variation of temperature, especially the Sb-org species. Antimony migrates from porewaters to the overlying water when the temperature decreases, and meanwhile the equilibrium between Sb(III) and Sb(V) in porewaters shifts toward Sb(V) when the temperature increases during seasonal alternation. Although temperature had less influence on the antimony species in sediments than in porewaters or in the overlying water, the average content of each antimony species in sediments increased with the decrease of temperature, suggesting that the decrease of temperature causes enrichment of antimony in the sediment.

Keyword

geochemistry antimony species seasonal variation Poyang Lake 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andreae M O, Asmode J F, Foster P, Van’t Dack L. 1981. Determination of antimony(III), antimony(V), and methylantimony species in natural waters by atomic absorption spectrometry with hydride generation. Anal. Chem., 53 (12): 1 766–1 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrewes P, Cullen W R, Polishchuk E. 2000. Antimony biomethylation by Scopulariopsis brevicaulis: characterization of intermediates and the methyl donor. Chemosphere, 41 (11): 1 717–1 725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asaoka S, Takahashi Y, Araki Y, Tanimizu M. 2012. Comparison of antimony and arsenic behavior in an Ichinokawa River water–sediment system. Chem. Geol., 334: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belzile N, Chen Y W, Wang Z J. 2001. Oxidation of antimony (III) by amorphous iron and manganese oxyhydroxides. Chem. Geol., 174 (4): 379–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belzile N, Chen Y W, Xu R R. 2000. Early diagenetic behaviour of selenium in freshwater sediments. Appl. Geochem., 15 (10): 1 439–1 454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentley R, Chasteen T G. 2002. Microbial methylation of metalloids: arsenic, antimony, and bismuth. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. R ev., 66 (2): 250–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrd J T. 1990. Comparative geochemistries of arsenic and antimony in rivers and estuaries. Sci. Total Environ., 97–98: 301–314.Google Scholar
  8. Cappuyns V, Swennen R, Niclaes M. 2007. Application of the BCR sequential extraction scheme to dredged pond sediments contaminated by Pb–Zn mining: a combined geochemical and mineralogical approach. J. Geochem. Explor., 93 (2): 78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Y W, Deng T L, Filella M, Belzile N. 2003. Distribution and early diagenesis of antimony species in sediments and porewaters of freshwater lakes. Environ. Sci. Technol., 37 (6): 1 163–1 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cutter G A, Cutter L S, Featherstone A M, Lohrenz S E. 2001. Antimony and arsenic biogeochemistry in the western Atlantic Ocean. Deep Sea Res. P ar t II: Top. Stud. Oceanogr., 48 (13): 2 895–2 915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cutter G A. 1991. Dissolved arsenic and antimony in the Black Sea. Deep Sea Res. P ar t A. Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 3 8 (2): S825–S843.Google Scholar
  12. Cutter G A. 1992. Kinetic controls on metalloid speciation in seawater. Mar. Chem., 40 (1–2): 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deng T L, Chen Y W, Belzile N. 2001. Antimony speciation at Ultra Trace levels using hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry and 8–hydroxyquinoline as an efficient masking agent. Anal. Chim. Acta, 432 (2): 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deng T L, Wu Y, Yu X P, Guo Y F, Chen Y W, Belzile N. 2014. Seasonal variations of arsenic at the sediment–water interface of Poyang Lake, China. Appl. Geochem., 47: 170–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Du Laing G, Rinklebe J, Vandecasteele B, Meers E, Tack F M G. 2009. Trace metal behaviour in estuarine and riverine floodplain soils and sediments: a review. Sci. Total Environ., 407 (13): 3 972–3 985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellwood M J, Maher W A. 2002. Arsenic and antimony species in surface transects and depth profiles across a frontal zone: the Chatham Rise, New Zealand. Deep Sea Res. P ar t I: Oceanogr. Res. Pap., 49 (11): 1 971–1 981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Filella M, Belzile N, Chen Y W. 2002a. Antimony in the environment: a review focused on natural waters: I. Occurrence. E arth–Sc i. Rev., 57 (1–2): 125–176.Google Scholar
  18. Filella M, Belzile N, Chen Y W. 2002b. Antimony in the environment: a review focused on natural waters: II. Relevant solution chemistry. Earth–Sci. Rev., 59 (1–4): 265–285.Google Scholar
  19. Frohne T, Rinklebe J, Diaz–Bone R A, Du Laing G. 2011. Controlled variation of redox conditions in a floodplain soil: Impact on metal mobilization and biomethylation of arsenic and antimony. Geoderma, 160 (3–4): 414–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gebel T, Christensen S, Dunkelberg H. 1997. Comparative and environmental genotoxicity of antimony and arsenic. Anticancer Res., 17 (4A): 2 603–2 607.Google Scholar
  21. Hammel W, Debus R, Steubing L. 2000. Mobility of antimony in soil and its availability to plants. Chemosphere, 41 (11): 1 791–1 798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. He M C, Wan H Y. 2004. Distribution, speciation, toxicity and bioavailability of antimony in the environment. Prog. Chem., 16 (1): 131–135. (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  23. Hindmarsh J T. 2000. Arsenic, its clinical and environmental significance. J. T race Ele m. Exp. Med., 13 (1): 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mitsunobu S, Harada T, Takahashi Y. 2006. Comparison of antimony behavior with that of arsenic under various soil redox conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol., 40 (23): 7 270–7 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reimann C, Matschullat J, Birke M, Salminen R. 2010. Antimony in the environment: lessons from geochemical mapping. Appl. Geochem., 25 (2): 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sadiq M. 1997. Arsenic chemistry in soils: an overview of thermodynamic predictions and field observations. Water, Air, Soil Poll., 93 (1–4): 117–136.Google Scholar
  27. Takayanagi K, Cossa D. 1997. Vertical distributions of Sb(III) and Sb(V) in Pavin Lake, France. Water Res., 3 1 (3): 671–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tessier A, Campbell P G C, Bisson M. 1979. Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal. Chem., 51 (7): 844–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Turner D R, Whitfield M, Dickson A G. 1981. The equilibrium speciation of dissolved components in freshwater and sea water at 25°C and 1 atm pressure. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac ta, 45 (6): 855–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wilson S C, Lockwood P V, Ashley P M, Tighe M. 2010. The chemistry and behaviour of antimony in the soil environment with comparisons to arsenic: a critical review. Environ. Poll ut., 158 (5): 1 169–1 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chinese Society for Oceanology and Limnology, Science Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoping Yu (余晓平)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yafei Guo (郭亚飞)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tianlong Deng (邓天龙)
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Tianjin Key Laboratory of Marine Resources and Chemistry, College of Chemical Engineering and Materials ScienceTianjin University of Science and TechnologyTianjinChina
  2. 2.College of Chemistry and Materials ScienceNorthwest UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations