Advertisement

Journal of Oceanology and Limnology

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 1013–1024 | Cite as

The post-larval and juvenile fish assemblage in the Sukhothai Floodplain, Thailand

  • Suksri Siriwan
  • Boonsoong Boonsatien
Article
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigated abundance, species composition and spatial and temporal distributions of fish larvae and their relationship with some environmental variables in the Sukhothai floodplain in northern Thailand. Fish larvae were collected from 33 sampling stations on 8 occasions between August 2010 and October 2013. The study collected and identified 149 296 individuals, representing 32 families and 165 taxa. The species composition of larval fish was dominated by the Cyprinidae (47.27%), Cobitidae (7.88%), Siluridae (6.67%), Bagridae (6.06%) and Mastacembelidae (3.33%) families. The mostabundant larval species were the Striped flying barb Esomus metallicus (16.90%), the Siamese mud carp Henicorhynchus siamensis (8.48%) and the Sumatran river sprat Clupeichthys goniognathus (8.31%). The greatest abundance and species diversity of larvae were found when the river flow runs onto the floodplain. PCA and nMDS analysis revealed that the samples plot is associated with temporal distribution among years. The discharge was a major factor determining fish larvae assemblage and environmental variables in the Sukhothai floodplain. Four fish larval species were positively correlated with the samples for 2013. The result of the CCA ordination plot showed that only the discharge variable was strongly correlated with fish larvae abundance, especially two cyprinid Rasbora species.

Keyword

fish larvae distribution diversity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgement

We are most grateful to our colleagues for assistance during field trips. We would like to thank the Department of Fisheries and Department of Zoology for facilities and assistance.

References

  1. Arbsuwan S, Musikasinthorn P, Marini M, Samhudi H. 2012. First record of the Cyprinid Fish, Esomus metallicus (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae) from Sumatra. The Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society, 58: 58–59.Google Scholar
  2. Baumgartner G, Nakatani K, Cavicchioli M, Baumgartner M T D S. 1997. Some aspects of the ecology of fish larvae in the floodplain of the high Paraná river, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 14 (3): 551–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Choi J K, Choi J S, Beamish F W. 2005. Tropical freshwater fish fauna of central Thailand. The Korean Journal of Systematic Zoology, 21 (2): 207–217.Google Scholar
  4. Cowx I G, Kamonrat W, Sukumasavin N, Sirimongkolthawon R, Suksri S, Phila N. 2015. Larval and juvenile fish communities of the lower Mekong Basin. Mekong River Commission, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. 100p.Google Scholar
  5. Daga V S, Gogola T M, Sanches P V, Baumgartner G, Baumgartner D, Piana P A, Gubiani É A, Delariva R L. 2009. Fish larvae assemblages in two floodplain lakes with different degrees of connection to the Paraná River, Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology, 7 (3): 429–438, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252009000300010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dutta D, Herath S. 2004. Trend of floods in Asia and a proposal for flood risk management with integrated river basin approach. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Asia-Pacific Hydrology and Water Resources Association. Singapore. p.128-137.Google Scholar
  7. Gogola T M, Sanches P V, GubianiÉ A, da Silva P R L. 2013. Spatial and temporal variations in fish larvae assemblages of Ilha Grande National Park, Brazil. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 22 (1): 95–105, https://doi.org/10.1111/eff.12007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Górski K, de Leeuw J J, Winter H V, Vekhov D A, Minin A E, Buijse A D, Nagelkerke L A J. 2011. Fish recruitment in a large, temperate floodplain: the importance of annual flooding, temperature and habitat complexity. Freshwater Biology, 56 (11): 2 210–2 225, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02647.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hortle K G. 2009. Fisheries of the Mekong River basin. In: Campbell I C ed. The Mekong-Biophysical Environment of an International River Basin. Academic Press, Elsevier, New York. p.197-247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hussain M G. 2010. Freshwater fishes of Bangladesh: fisheries, biodiversity and habitat. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 13 (1): 85–93, https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980903578233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jutagate T, De Silva S S, Mattson N S. 2003. Yield, growth and mortality rate of the Thai river sprat, Clupeichthys aesarnensis, in Sirinthorn Reservoir, Thailand. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 10 (4): 221–231, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2400.2003.00338.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kara H M. 2012. Freshwater fish diversity in Algeria with emphasis on alien species. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 58 (1): 243–253, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0570-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kottelat M. 2013. The fishes of the inland waters of Southeast Asia: a catalogue and core bibliography of the fishes known to occur in freshwaters, mangroves and estuaries. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 27 (S): 1–663.Google Scholar
  14. McCune B, Mefford M J. 2011. PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 6.0. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Mondal D K, Kaviraj A, Saha S. 2010. Water quality parameters and fish biodiversity indices as measures of ecological degradation: a case study in two floodplain lakes of India. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2 (1): 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moss B. 2010. Ecology of freshwaters: a view for the twentyfirst century. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford. 470p.Google Scholar
  17. Nunn A D, Harvey J P, Britton J R, Frear P A, Cowx I G. 2007. Fish, climate and the Gulf Stream: the influence of abiotic factors on the recruitment success of cyprinid fishes in lowland rivers. Freshwater Biology, 52: 1 576–1 586, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01789.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Phomikong P, Fukushima M, Sricharoendham B, Nohara S, Jutagate T. 2015. Diversity and community structure of fishes in the regulated versus unregulated tributaries of the Mekong river. River Research and Applications, 31 (10): 1 262–1 275, https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pollution Control Department. 1992. Water quality management bureau. http://infofile.pcd.go.th/mgt/WaterQuality.pdf. Accessed on 2016-05-20.Google Scholar
  20. Rainboth W J. 1996. Fishes of the Cambodian Mekong. FAO, Rome. 256p.Google Scholar
  21. Ratmuangkhwang S. 2007. Taxonomic review of the southern Asian airsac catfish Heteropneustes fossilis (Siluriformes: Heteropneustidae). Kasetsart University, Bangkok.Google Scholar
  22. Royal Irrigation Department Thailand. 2014. Hydrology irrigation for lower Northern region. http://www.hydro-2.com/. Accessed on 2014-01-10.Google Scholar
  23. Shuai F M, Li X H, Li Y F, Li J, Yang J P, Lek S. 2016. Temporal patterns of larval fish occurrence in a large subtropical river. PLoS One, 11 (1): e0146441, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Suvarnaraksha A, Lek S, Lek-Ang S, Jutagate T. 2011. Life history of the riverine cyprinid Henicorhynchus siamensis (Sauvage, 1881) in a small reservoir. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 27 (4): 995–1 000, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2010.01619.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tanaka W, Wattanasiriserekul R, Tomiyama Y, Yamasita T, Phinrub W, Chamnivikaipong T, Suvarnaraksha A, Shimatani Y. 2015. Influence of floodplain area on fish species richness in waterbodies of the Chao Phraya river basin, Thailand. Open Journal of Ecology, 5 (9): 434–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Termvidchakorn A, Buanak T, Soonthornvipat S, Hunpongkittikul A, Suksri S. 2005. The development tribe and subtribe identification of the fish larvae in subfamily Cyprininae. Inland Fisheries Research and Development Bureau, Department of Fisheries, Bangkok. 77p.Google Scholar
  27. Termvidchakorn A, Hortle K G. 2013. A guide to larvae and juveniles of some common fish species from the Mekong River Basin. Mekong River Commission, Phnom Penh. 234p.Google Scholar
  28. Termvidchakorn A, Soonthornvipat P, Soonthornvipat S, Hunpongkittikul A, Suksri S. 2007. The development and family identification of the catfish larvae in order siluriformes. Inland Fisheries Research and Development Bureau, Department of Fisheries, Bangkok. 54p.Google Scholar
  29. Termvidchakorn A. 2003. Freshwater fish larvae. Inland Fisheries Resources Research and Development Institute, Inland Fisheries Research and Development Bureau, Department of Fisheries, Bangkok, 130p.Google Scholar
  30. Termvidchakorn A. 2005. Freshwater fish larvae in Thailand II. Inland Fisheries Resources Research and Development Institute, Inland Fisheries Research and Development Bureau, Department of Fisheries, Bangkok, 125p.Google Scholar
  31. Thailand Water Partnership. 2014. Yom River Basin, Thailand. http://gwpseatoolbox.net/wapi/mctweb.dll/. Accessed on 2014-01-10.Google Scholar
  32. Vidthayanon C. 2012a. Clupeichthys goniognathus. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2012: e.T180731A1656641. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2012-1.RLTS.T180731A1656641.en. Accessed on 2016-05-20.Google Scholar
  33. Vidthayanon, C. 2012b. Discherodontus colemani. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2012: e. T181286A1717373. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2012-1.RLTS.T181286A1717373.en. Accessed on 2016-12-03.Google Scholar
  34. Wootton R J. 1992. Fish Ecology. Chapman and Hall Publishing, New York. 121p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chinese Society for Oceanology and Limnology, Science Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Animal Systematics and Ecology Speciality Research Unit (ASESRU), Department of Zoology, Faculty of ScienceKasetsart UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations