Intestinal microbiota of healthy and unhealthy Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. in a recirculating aquaculture system
- 245 Downloads
The present study sampled the intestinal content of healthy and unhealthy Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.), the ambient water of unhealthy fish, and the biofilter material in the recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) to understand differences in the intestinal microbiota. The V4–V5 regions of the prokaryotic 16S rRNA genes in the samples were analyzed by MiSeq high-throughput sequencing. The fish were adults with no differences in body length or weight. Representative members of the intestinal microbiota were identified. The intestinal microbiota of the healthy fish included Proteobacteria (44.33%), Actinobacteria (17.89%), Bacteroidetes (15.25%), and Firmicutes (9.11%), among which the families Micrococcaceae and Oxalobacteraceae and genera Sphingomonas, Streptomyces, Pedobacter, Janthinobacterium, Burkholderia, and Balneimonas were most abundant. Proteobacteria (70.46%), Bacteroidetes (7.59%), and Firmicutes (7.55%) dominated the microbiota of unhealthy fish, and Chloroflexi (2.71%), and Aliivibrio and Vibrio as well as genera in the family Aeromonadaceae were most strongly represented. Overall, the intestinal hindgut microbiota differed between healthy and unhealthy fish. This study offers a useful tool for monitoring the health status of fish and for screening the utility of probiotics by studying the intestinal microbiota.
Keywordintestinal microbiota health status Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) recirculating aquaculture system high-throughput pyrosequencing
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bakke-McKellep A M, Penn M H, Salas P M, Refstie S, Sperstad S, Landsverk T, Ringø E, Krogdahl Å. 2007. Effects of dietary soyabean meal, inulin and oxytetracycline on intestinal microbiota and epithelial cell stress, apoptosis and proliferation in the teleost Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Brit. J. Nutr., 97 (4): 699–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Caporaso J G, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman F D, Costello E K, Fierer N, Peña A G, Goodrich J K, Gordon J I, Huttley G A, Kelley S T, Knights D, Koenig J E, Ley R E, Lozupone C A, McDonald D, McDonald B D, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky J R, Turnbaugh P J, Walters W A, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods., 7 (5): 335–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Claesson M J, Jeffery I B, Conde S, Power S E, O’Connor E M, Cusack S, Harris H M B, Coakley M, Lakshminarayanan B, O’Sullivan O, Fitzgerald G F, Deane J, O’Connor M, Harnedy N, O’Connor K, O’Mahony D, van Sinderen D, Wallace M, Brennan L, Stanton C, Marchesi J R, Fitzgerald A P, Shanahan F, Hill C, Ross R P, O’Toole P W. 2012. Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly. Nature, 488 (7410): 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dharmaraj S. 2011. Antagonistic potential of marine actinobacteria against fish and shellfish pathogens. Turk. J. Bio l., 35 (3): 303–311.Google Scholar
- Ewart K V, Belanger J C, Williams J, Karakach T, Penny S, Tsoi S C M, Richards R C, Douglas S E. 2005. Identification of genes differentially expressed in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in response to infection by Aeromonas salmonicida using cDNA microarray technology. Dev. Comp. Immunol., 29 (4): 333–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Giongo A, Gano K A, Crabb D B, Mukherjee N, Novelo L L, Casella G, Drew J C, Ilonen J, Knip M, Hyöty H, Veijola R, Simell T, Simell O, Neu J, Wasserfall C H, Schatz D, Atkinson M A, Triplett E W. 2011. Toward defining the autoimmune microbiome for type 1 diabetes. ISME J, 5 (1): 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gustafson C E, Thomas C J, Trust T J. 1992. Detection of Aeromonas salmonicida from fish by using polymerase chain reaction amplification of the virulence surface array protein gene. Appl. Environ. Microb iol., 58 (12): 3816–3825.Google Scholar
- Velmurugan S, John S T, Nagaraj D S, Ashine T A, Kumaran S, Pugazhvendan S. 2015. Isolation of actinomycetes from shrimp culture pond and antagonistic to pathogenic Vibrio spp. and WSSV. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 4 (7): 82–92.Google Scholar
- Wolfensohn S, Lloyd M. 2008. Handbook of Laboratory Animal Management and Welfare. 3 rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, United Kingdom.Google Scholar