Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 118–127 | Cite as

Marine ciliate community in relation to eutrophication of coastal waters in the Yellow Sea

  • Kuidong Xu (徐奎栋)
  • Joong Ki Choi
  • Yanli Lei (类彦立)
  • Eun Jin Yang
Biology

Abstract

We assessed the potential of marine ciliate community as an indicator to coastal water quality using water samples collected from four stations in the Yellow Sea in the summer 2000. The four stations were characterized by different levels of pollution. The ciliate communities consisted primarily of tintinnids and aloricate ciliates that were <30 μm. A total of 78 species were classified: 55 species at Station 2, 51 species each at Stations 1 and 4, and 47 species at Station 3. The mean number of species at each site was 29.2±2.0 (Station 1), 28.5±2.9 (Station 2), 27.8±1.7 (Station 3), and 24.5±2.3 (Station 4). The abundance was highly variable: 19 331±11 187 ind./L at Station 1, 7 960±5 639 ind./L at Station 2, 29 015±12 999 ind./L at Station 3, and 8 190±4 658 ind./L at Station 4. Our results suggest that neither the simple chemical analysis (e.g. chemical oxygen demand, dissolved inorganic nitrogen, and phosphate) nor the eutrophication/pollution index adequately described the water quality at the four stations. The same was true of the number of species and their abundance, both of which had no correlation with the chemical indices. In contrast, Margalef’s diversity index values (3.12 at Station 2, 2.89 at Station 1, and 2.64 at Stations 3 and 4) generally discriminated the water quality status of the four stations. The difference in water quality among the stations was strongly supported by the pattern of species richness (i.e. the total number of species) of ciliates at each station. Our evaluation was consistent with the results of long-term water quality monitoring at the four stations. With increasing eutrophication, we observed also a compositional and functional shift in the ciliate assemblages from algivorous oligotrich/choreotrich to nonselective-omnivorous gymnostomatids to bacterivorous-detrivorous scuticociliatids. Thus, ciliates may be used to indicate the coastal water quality status of a given site.

Keyword

biomonitoring chemical evaluation ciliates community structure eutrophication marine pollution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bark A W, Goodfellow J G. 1985. Studies on ciliated protozoa in eutrophic lakes: 2. Field and laboratory studies on the effects of oxygen and other chemical gradients on ciliate distribution. Hydrobiologia, 124: 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaver J R, Crisman T L. 1982. The trophic response of ciliated protozoans in freshwater lakes. Limnology and Oceanogrophy, 27: 246–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cairns J Jr, Lanza G R, Parker B C. 1972. Pollution related to structural and functional changes in aquatic communities with emphasis on freshwater algae and protozoa. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 124: 79–127.Google Scholar
  4. Cho J Y, Son J G, Park B J, Chung B Y. 2009. Distribution and pollution sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in reclaimed tidelands and tidelands of the western sea coast of South Korea. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 149: 385–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi J K, Lee E H, Noh J H, Huh S H. 1997. The study on the phytoplankton bloom and primary productivity in Lake Shihwa and adjacent coastal areas. The Sea, Journal of the Korean Society of Oceanography, 2: 78–86. (in Korean with English abstract)Google Scholar
  6. Corliss J O. 1979. The Ciliated Protozoa: Characterization, Classification and Guide to the Literature. Second ed. Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Curds C R. 1982. Pelagic protists and pollution: a review of the past decade. Annales de l’Institut Oceanographique, Paris. Nouvelle Serie, 58: 117–137.Google Scholar
  8. Dale T. 1991. Protists and pollution—with an emphasis on planktonic ciliates and heavy metals. In: Reid P C, Turley C M, Burkill P H, ed. Protozoa and Their Role in Marine Processes. NATO ASI Series G 25. p. 115–130.Google Scholar
  9. Decamp O, Warren A, Sanchez R. 1999. The role of ciliated protozoa in subsurface flow wetlands and their potential as bioindicators. Water Science and Technology, 40: 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kalavati C, Raman A V, Vaidehi J, Bharathi R. 1997. Effects of pollution on planktonic ciliates in Visakhapatnam harbour. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, 26: 68–73.Google Scholar
  11. Karydis M, Tsirtsis G. 1996. Ecological indices: a biometric approach for assessing eutrophication levels in the marine environment. The Science of Total Environment, 186: 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim D H, Park Y C, Lee H J, Son J W. 2004. Characteristics of geochemical processes along the salinity gradient in the Han River Estuary. The Sea, Journal of the Korean Society of Oceanography, 9: 196–203. (in Korean with English abstract)Google Scholar
  13. Li Z, Li D, Oh J R, Je J G. 2004. Seasonal and spatial distribution of nonylphenol in Shihwa Lake, Korea. Chemosphere, 56: 611–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lynn D H, Gilron G L. 1992. A brief review of approaches using ciliated protists to assess aquatic ecosystem health. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health, 1: 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Madoni P. 2005. Ciliated protozoan communities and saprobic evaluation of water quality in the hilly zone of some tributaries of the Po River (northern Italy). Hydrobiologia, 541: 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MOMAF. 1998. Marine Environment Standard Analysis Method in Korea. MOMAF Report.Google Scholar
  17. Montagnes D J S, Lynn D H. 1993. A quantitative protargol stain (QPS) for ciliates and other protists. In: Kemp P F, Sherr B F, Sherr E B ed. Handbook of Methods in Aquatic Microbial Ecology, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton. p. 229–240.Google Scholar
  18. Mugurran A E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  19. Park Y C, Park J K, Han M W, Son S K, Kim M K, Huh S H. 1997. Biogeochemical study of dissolved organic and inorganic compounds under oxic/anoxic environment in Lake Shihwa. The Sea, Journal of the Korean Society of Oceanography, 2: 53–68. (in Korean with English abstract).Google Scholar
  20. Parker J G. 1983. Ciliated protozoa in marine pollution studies. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 7: 172–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parsons T R, Maita Y, Lali C M. 1984. A Manual of Chemical and Biological Methods for Seawater Analysis. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Patrick R. 1988. Importance of diversity in the functioning and structure of riverine communities. Limnology and Oceanography, 33: 1 304–1 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pielou E C. 1969. An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Pratt J R, Balczon J M. 1992. Biomonitoring using protozoans. In: Lee J J, Soldo A T ed. Protocols in Protozoology. Society of Protozoologists, B-12. 1-B-12.3.Google Scholar
  25. Revelante N, Gilmartin M, Smodlaka N. 1985. The effects of Po River induced eutrophication on the distribution and community structure of ciliated protozoan and micrometazoan populations in the northern Adriatic Sea. Journal of Plankton Research, 7: 461–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. SAS. 1983. SAS User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  27. Shen Y, Feng W, Gu M, Wang S, Wu, J, Tan, Y. 1995. Monitoring of River Pollution. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  28. Son J W, Park Y C, Lee H J. 2003. Characteristics of total organic carbon and chemical oxygen demand (COD) in the coastal waters of Korea. The Sea, Journal of the Korean Society of Oceanography, 8: 317–326. (in Korean with English abstract)Google Scholar
  29. USEPA. 1997. Ambient aquatic life water quality criteria for nonylphenol. EPA Report No. 68-C6-0036.Google Scholar
  30. Wang X, Cui Z, Guo Q, Han X, Wang J. 2009. Distribution of nutrients and eutrophication assessment in the Bohai Sea of China. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 27: 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilbert N. 1975. Eine verbesserte Technik der Protargolimprägnation für Ciliaten. Mikrokosmos, 6: 171–179.Google Scholar
  32. Xu H, Song W, Lu L, Warren A. 2005. Tolerance of ciliated protozoan Paramecium bursaria (Protozoa, Ciliophora) to ammonia and nitrites. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 23: 349–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xu K, Choi J K, Yang E J, Lei Y, Lee K C. 2000. Assessment of planktonic ciliate communities as indicators of water quality in Inchon coastal waters. The Yellow Sea, 6: 50–58.Google Scholar
  34. Xu K, Choi J K, Yang E J, Lee K C, Lei Y. 2002. Biomonitoring of coastal pollution status using protozoan communities with a modified PFU method. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 44: 877–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zou J, Dong L, Qin B. 1983. Elementary study on eutrophication and red tide in Bohai. Marine Environmental Science, 2: 41–53 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chinese Society for Oceanology and Limnology, Science Press and Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kuidong Xu (徐奎栋)
    • 1
  • Joong Ki Choi
    • 2
  • Yanli Lei (类彦立)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eun Jin Yang
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of OceanologyChinese Academy of SciencesQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Department of OceanographyInha UniversityIncheonKorea
  3. 3.Korea Polar Research InstituteKORDIIncheonKorea

Personalised recommendations