Applied Physics B

, 125:29 | Cite as

Absolute SiO concentration imaging in low-pressure nanoparticle-synthesis flames via laser-induced fluorescence

  • Robin S. M. Chrystie
  • Felix L. Ebertz
  • Thomas DreierEmail author
  • Christof Schulz


In this paper, we present a strategy for imaging measurements of absolute concentration values of gas-phase SiO in the combustion synthesis of silica, generated from the reaction of hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) precursor in a lean (ϕ = 0.6) hydrogen/oxygen/argon flame. The method is based on laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) exciting the Q(42) rotational transition within the A1Π − X1Σ (1, 0) electronic band system of SiO at 231 nm. Corrections for temperature-dependent population of the related ground state are based on multi-line SiO–LIF thermometry utilizing transitions within the A1Π − X1Σ (0, 0) electronic band around 234 nm. Corrections for local collisional quenching are based on measured effective fluorescence lifetimes from the temporal signal decay using a short camera gate stepped with respect to the laser pulse. This fluorescence lifetime measurement was confirmed with additional measurements using a fast photomultiplier. The resulting semi-quantitative LIF signal was photometrically calibrated using Rayleigh scattering from known gas samples at various pressures and laser energies as well as with nitric oxide LIF. The obtained absolute SiO concentration values in the HMDSO-doped flames will serve as a stringent test case for recently developed flame kinetic mechanisms for this class of gas-borne silicon dioxide nanoparticle synthesis.



The financial support of this project by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) within FOR 2284 (contract DR 195/17-2) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors also thank Torsten Endres, Siavash Zabeti and Usama Murtaza for fruitful discussions and supporting experiments.


  1. 1.
    S.E. Pratsinis, Flame aerosol synthesis of ceramic powders. Progr. Energy Combust. Sci. 24(3), 197–219 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Roth, Particle synthesis in flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 31(2), 1773–1788 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Li et al., Flame aerosol synthesis of nanostructured materials and functional devices: Processing, modeling, and diagnostics. Progr. Energ. Combust. Sci. 55, 1–59 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Schulz et al., Gas-phase synthesis of functional nanomaterials: challenges to kinetics, diagnostics, and process development. Proc. Combust. Inst. 37, 83–108 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    N.G. Glumac, Formation and consumption of SiO in powder synthesis flames. Combust. Flame 124, 702–711 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Janbazi et al., Response surface and group-additivity methodology for estimation of thermodynamic properties of organosilanes. Int. J. Chem. Kin. 50(9), 681–690 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.R. Zachariah, D.R.F. Burges, Strategies for laser excited fluorescence spectroscopy. Measurements of gas phase species during particle formation. J. Aerosol Sci. 25(3), 487–497 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feroughi, O.M., et al., Experimental and numerical study of a HMDSO-seeded premixed laminar low-pressure flame for SiO2 nanoparticle synthesis. Proc. Combust. Inst. 36, 1045–1053 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R.S.M. Chrystie et al., Comparative study of flame-based SiO2 nanoparticle synthesis from TMS and HMDSO: SiO–LIF concentration measurement and detailed simulation. Proc. Combust. Inst. 37(1), 1221–1229 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Dreier, C. Schulz, Laser-based diagnostics in the gas-phase synthesis of inorganic nanoparticles. Powder Technol. 287, 226–238 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. van de Weijer, B.H. Zwerver, Laser-induced fluorescence of OH and SiO molecules during thermal chemical vapour deposition of SiO2 from silane-oxygen mixtures. Chem. Phys. Lett. 163(1), 48–54 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.J. Hynes, Laser-induced fluorescence of silicon monoxide in a glow discharge and an atmospheric pressure flame. Chem. Phys. Lett. 181(2–3), 237–244 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Yamashiro, Y. Matsumoto, K. Honma, Reaction dynamics of Si(PJ3) + O2→ SiO(XΣ + 1) + O studied by a crossed-beam laser-induced fluorescence technique. J. Chem. Phys. 128(8), 084308 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Goodwin, D. Capewell, P. Paul, Planar laser-induced fluorescence diagnostics of pulsed laser ablation of silicon, in MRS Online Proceedings Library Archive (1995), p. 388Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Walkup, S. Raider, In situ measurements of SiO(g) production during dry oxidation of crystalline silicon. Appl. Phys. Lett. 53(10), 888–890 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O. Motret, F. Coursimault, J. Pouvesle, Absolute silicon monoxide density measurement by self-absorbed spectroscopy in a non-thermal atmospheric plasma. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 37(13), 1750 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R.S.M. Chrystie et al., SiO multi-line laser-induced fluorescence for quantitative temperature imaging in flame-synthesis of nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt. 123(4), 104 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.R. Reisel et al., Laser-saturated fluorescence measurements of nitric oxide in laminar, flat, C2H6/O2/N2 flames at atmospheric pressure. Combust. Sci. Technol. 91(4–6), 271–295 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. Desgroux, M. Cottereau, Local OH concentration measurement in atmospheric pressure flames by a laser-saturated fluorescence method: two-optical path laser-induced fluorescence. Appl. Opt. 30(1), 90–97 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Koch et al., Planar imaging of a laboratory flame and of internal combustion in an automobile engine using UV Rayleigh and fluorescence light. Appl. Phys. B 56(3), 177–184 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Rothe et al., Effect of laser intensity and of lower-state rotational energy transfer upon temperature measurements made with laser-induced predissociative fluorescence. Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt. 66(2), 251–258 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    E.W. Rothe et al., Effect of laser intensity and of lower-state rotational energy transfer upon temperature measurements made with laser-induced predissociative fluorescence. Appl. Phys. B 66, 251–258 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    E.W. Rothe, P. Andresen, Application of tunable excimer lasers to combustion diagnostics: a review. Appl. Opt. 36(18), 3971–4033 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    C. Schulz, V. Sick, Tracer-LIF diagnostics: Quantitative measurement of fuel concentration, temperature and air/fuel ratio in practical combustion systems. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 31, 75–121 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    W.G. Bessler et al., Quantitative NO–LIF imaging in high-pressure flames. Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt. 75(1), 97–102 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    C. Hecht et al., Imaging measurements of atomic iron concentration with laser-induced fluorescence in a nano-particle synthesis flame reactor. Appl. Phys. B 94, 119–125 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. Versluis et al., 2-D absolute OH concentration profiles in atmospheric flames using planar LIF in a bi-directional laser beam configuration. Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt. 65(3), 411–417 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    C. Brackmann et al., Structure of premixed ammonia + air flames at atmospheric pressure: laser diagnostics and kinetic modeling. Combust. Flame 163, 370–381 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    J. Luque et al., Quasi-simultaneous detection of CH2O and CH by cavity ring-down absorption and laser-induced fluorescence in a methane/air low-pressure flame. Appl. Phys. B 73(7), 731–738 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    S.V. Naik, N.M. Laurendeau, Measurements of absolute CH concentrations by cavity ring-down spectroscopy and linear laser-induced fluorescence in laminar, counterflow partially premixed and nonpremixed flames at atmospheric pressure. Appl. Opt. 43(26), 5116–5125 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    J.D. Koch et al., Rayleigh-calibrated fluorescence quantum yield measurements of acetone and 3-pentanone. Appl. Opt. 43(31), 5901–5910 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    C. Kaminski, P. Ewart, Absolute concentration measurements of C2 in a diamond CVD reactor by laser-induced fluorescence. Appl. Phys. B 61(6), 585–592 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    J. Luque, D. Crosley, Absolute CH concentrations in low-pressure flames measured with laser-induced fluorescence. Appl. Phys. B 63(1), 91–98 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    J. Luque et al., Quantitative laser-induced fluorescence of CH in atmospheric pressure flames. Appl. Phys. B 75(6–7), 779–790 (2002)ADSGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    W. Juchmann et al. Absolute radical concentration measurements and modeling of low-pressure CH4/O2/NO flames, in Symposium (International) on Combustion (Elsevier, 1998)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    W.G. Bessler et al., Strategies for laser-induced fluorescence detection of nitric oxide in high-pressure flames: III. Comparison of A−X strategies. Appl. Opt. 42(24), 4922–4936 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    W.G. Bessler et al., Strategies for laser-induced fluorescence detection of nitric oxide in high-pressure flames. I. A−X (0, 0) excitation. Appl. Opt. 41(18), 3547–3557 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    A.C. Eckbreth, Laser Diagnostics for Combustion Temperature and Species, 2 edn. (Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam, 1996)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    S.V. Naik, N.M. Laurendeau, Measurements of absolute CH concentrations by cavity ring-down spectroscopy and linear laser-induced fluorescence in laminar, counterflow partially premixed and nonpremixed flames at atmospheric pressure. Appl. Opt. 43, 5116–5125 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    M. Born, E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Pergamon. New York, 1980) pp. 393–401Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    I.S. McDermid, J.B. Laudenslager, Radiative lifetimes and electronic quenching rate constants for single-photon-excited rotational levels of NO (A2Σ+, v′ = 0). J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 27, 483–492 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    C. Amiot, R. Bacis, G. Guelachvili, Infrared study of the X2Π v = 0, 1, 2 levels of 14N16O. Preliminary results on the v = 0, 1 levels of 14N17O, 14N18O, and 15N16O. Can. J. Phys. 56, 251–265 (1978)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    M. Geier, C.B. Dreyer, T.E. Parker, Laser-induced emission spectrum from high-temperature silica-generating flames. J. Quant. Spectr. Radiat. Transf. 109, 822–830 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    P. Andresen et al., Laser-induced fluorescence with tunable excimer lasers as a possible method for instantaneous temperature field measurements at high pressures: checks with an atmospheric flame. Appl. Opt. 27(2), 365–378 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    H.S. Liszt, W.M.H. Smith, RKR Franck–Condon factors for blue and ultraviolet transitions of some molecules of astrophysical interest and some comments on the interstellar abundance of CH, CH+ and SiH+. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Trans. 12, 947–958 (1972)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    W.H. Smith, H. Liszt, Radiative lifetimes and absolute oscillator strengths for the SiO A1Π-X1Σ + transition. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 12(4), 505–509 (1972)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    J. Oddershede, N. Elander, Spectroscopic constants and radiative lifetimes for valence-excited bound states in SiO. J. Chem. Phys. 65(9), 3495–3505 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    S.R. Langhoff, J.O. Arnold, Theoretical study of the X1Σ+, A1Π, C1Σ− and E1Σ + states for the SiO molecule. J. Chem. Phys. 70(2), 852–863 (1979)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    S. Chattopadhyaya, A. Chattopadhyay, K.K. Das, Configuration interaction study of the low-lying electronic states of silicon monoxide. J. Phys. Chem. A 107(1), 148–158 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    I. Drira et al., Theoretical study of the A1Π− X1Σ+ and E1Σ+ − X1Σ+ bands of SiO. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 60(1), 1–8 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IVG, Institute for Combustion and Gas Dynamics-Reactive FluidsUniversity of Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany
  2. 2.CENIDE, Center for NanointegrationUniversity of Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany

Personalised recommendations