Advertisement

Applied Physics B

, 124:150 | Cite as

Assessment on the deviation from an ideal Gaussian beam for a real laser beam by Fresnel–Huygens phase-retrieval method

  • Pao-Keng Yang
  • Jian-You Liu
Article
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

The deviation of a real laser beam from an ideal Gaussian beam can be ascribed either to the non-Gaussianity of the intensity profile or to the non-planarity of the wave front at the beam waist. We demonstrate a method to differentiate these two causes. The contribution of the phase distortion at the beam waist to the deviation from an ideal Gaussian beam can be assessed from the change in modal spectrum when the wave front at the beam waist is replaced by a flat plane. The crucial information about the phase-profile function of the optical field at the beam waist for mode decomposition was calculated from two intensity profiles for different cross-sections around the beam waist using a convergent iterative algorithm based on the Fresnel–Huygens principle. Using a HeNe laser with its beam close to an ideal Gaussian beam for test, we found that both effects have comparable contributions to the deviation from an ideal Gaussian beam.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan, Republic of China, under Grants MOST 104-2221-E-159-009 and MOST 105-2632-E-159-001.

References

  1. 1.
    H.M. Chen, Experimental isolation and measurement of laser-induced effects: thermal lensing, turbidity and the optical Kerr effect. Opt. Las. Technol. 28, 615–620 (1996)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Z.R. Mei, D.M. Zhao, Generalized beam propagation factor of hard-edged circular apertured diffracted Bessel–Gaussian beams. Opt. Las. Technol. 39, 1389–1394 (2007)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H.A. Haus, Waves and fields in optoelectronics (Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, 1984)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B.C. Platt, R. Shack, History and principles of Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensing. J. Refract. Surg. 17, S573–S577 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Pathak, B.R. Boruah, Improved wavefront reconstruction algorithm for Shack–Hartmann type wavefront sensors. J. Opt. 16, 055403 (2014)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.G. Lane, M. Tallon, Wave-front reconstruction using a Shack–Hartmann sensor. Appl. Opt. 32, 6902–6908 (1992)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Paurisse, L. Lévèque, M. Hanna, F. Druon, P. Georges, Complete measurement of fiber modal content by wavefront analysis. Opt. Express 20, 4074–4084 (2012)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.W. Gerchberg, W.O. Saxton, A practical algorithm for the determination of the phase from image and diffraction plane pictures. Optik 35, 237–246 (1972)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Matsuoka, K. Yamakawa, Wavefront reconstruction from intensity measurements using Fresnel phase retrieval method. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 38, L1183–L1185 (1999)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Matsuoka, K. Yamakawa, Wave-front measurements of terawatt-class ultrashort laser pulses by the Fresnel phase-retrieval method. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 17, 663–667 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.K. Yang, W.T. Shih, Fast convergent conditions of an iterative method for retrieving the Kerr-effect-aberrated phase profile of a laser beam. Chin. J. Phys. 48, 381–391 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Pedrini, W. Osten, Y. Zhang, Wave-front reconstruction from a sequence of interferograms recorded at different planes. Opt. Lett. 30, 833–835 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Grilli, P. Ferraro, S. De Nicola, A. Finizio, G. Pierattini, R. Meucci, Whole optical wavefields reconstruction by digital holography. Opt. Express 9, 294–302 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. De Nicola, P. Ferraro, A. Finizio, G. Pierattini, Wave front reconstruction of Fresnel off-axis holograms with compensation of aberrations by means of phase-shifting digital holography. Opt. Laser Eng. 37, 331–340 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Huang, S. Guo, J. Leng, H. Lü, P. Zhou, X. Cheng, Real-time mode decomposition for few-mode fiber based on numerical method. Opt. Express 23, 4620–4629 (2015)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. R. Fowles, Introduction to modern optics, 2nd ed. (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York, 1975)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Weber, Some historical and technical aspects of beam quality. Opt. Quant. Electron. 24, 861–864 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A.E. Siegman, Defining, measuring, and optimizing laser beam quality, Proc. SPIE 1868, 2 (1993)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    ISO11146, Lasers and laser-related equipment—test methods for laser beam widths, divergence angles and beam propagation ratios Part 1–3Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Pan, J. Ma, R. Zhu, T. Ba, C. Zou, F. Chen, J. Dou, C. Wei, W. Zhou, Real-time complex amplitude reconstruction method for beam quality M 2 factor measurement. Opt. Express 25, 20142 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    S.S. Hashemi, S.G. Sabouri, A. Khorsandi, In situ measurement of laser beam quality. Appl. Phys. B 123, 233 (2017)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    T. Kaiser, D. Flamm, S. Schröter, M. Duparré, Complete modal decomposition for optical fiber using CGH-based correlation filters. Opt. Express 17, 9347–9356 (2009)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. Flamm, C. Schulze, R. Brüning, O.A. Schmidt, T. Kaiser, S. Schröter, M. Duparré, Fast M 2 measurement for fiber beams based on modal analysis. Appl. Opt. 51, 987–993 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department and Institute of Opto-electronic System EngineeringMing-Hsin University of Science and TechnologyHsinchuTaiwan

Personalised recommendations