Advertisement

Applied Physics B

, 124:90 | Cite as

Intensity stabilisation of optical pulse sequences for coherent control of laser-driven qubits

  • Joseph Thom
  • Ben Yuen
  • Guido Wilpers
  • Erling Riis
  • Alastair G. Sinclair
Article
  • 182 Downloads

Abstract

We demonstrate a system for intensity stabilisation of optical pulse sequences used in laser-driven quantum control of trapped ions. Intensity instability is minimised by active stabilisation of the power (over a dynamic range of \(> 10^{4}\)) and position of the focused beam at the ion. The fractional Allan deviations in power were found to be \(<2.2 \times 10^{-4}\) for averaging times from 1 to 16,384 s. Over similar times, the absolute Allan deviation of the beam position is \(<0.1\) \(\upmu\)m for a 45 \({\upmu }\)m beam diameter. Using these residual power and position instabilities, we estimate the associated contributions to infidelity in example qubit logic gates to be below \(10^{-6}\) per gate.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank E. Theocharous (NPL) for assistance in detector characterisation. We thank the following individuals for informative discussions: D. Szwer (NPL), D. Lucas and C. Ballance (Oxford), and C. Roos (Innsbruck). This work was funded by the UK National Measurement Office and project EXL01 QESOCAS of the European Metrology Research Programme (EMRP) [Grant Agreement No. 912/2009/EC]. The EMRP is jointly funded by the EMRP participating countries within EURAMET and the European Union. JT was supported by the EPSRC Industrial Doctorate Centre in Optics and Photonics. BY was supported by an EPSRC Knowledge Transfer Secondment from Imperial College London.

References

  1. 1.
    A.M. Steane, Overhead and noise threshold of fault-tolerant quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. A 68, 042322 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Knill, Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices. Nature 434(7029), 39–44 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Raussendorf, J. Harrington, K. Goyal, Topological fault-tolerance in cluster state quantum computation. N. J. Phys. 9(6), 199 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.P. Gaebler, T.R. Tan, Y. Lin, Y. Wan, R. Bowler, A.C. Keith, S. Glancy, K. Coakley, E. Knill, D. Leibfried, D.J. Wineland, High-fidelity universal gate set for \({}^{9}{\text{ Be }}^{ + }\) ion qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 060505 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Blatt, D. Wineland, Entangled states of trapped atomic ions. Nature 453(7198), 1008–1015 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Q.A. Turchette, C.S. Wood, B.E. King, C.J. Myatt, D. Leibfried, W.M. Itano, C. Monroe, D.J. Wineland, Deterministic entanglement of two trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81(17), 3631–3634 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.A. Sackett, D. Kielpinski, B.E. King, C. Langer, V. Meyer, C.J. Myatt, M. Rowe, Q.A. Turchette, W.M. Itano, D.J. Wineland, C. Monroe, Experimental entanglement of four particles. Nature 404(6775), 256–259 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.A. Rowe, D. Kielpinski, V. Meyer, C.A. Sackett, W.M. Itano, C. Monroe, D.J. Wineland, Experimental violation of a Bell’s inequality with efficient detection. Nature 409(6822), 791–794 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Leibfried, B. DeMarco, V. Meyer, D. Lucas, M. Barrett, J. Britton, W.M. Itano, B. Jelenkovic, C. Langer, R. T., D. J. Wineland, Experimental demonstration of a robust, high-fidelity geometric two ion-qubit phase gate. Nature 422(6930), 412–415 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Benhelm, G. Kirchmair, C.F. Roos, R. Blatt, Towards fault-tolerant quantum computing with trapped ions. Nat. Phys. 4, 463–466 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C.J. Ballance, T.P. Harty, N.M. Linke, M.A. Sepiol, D.M. Lucas, High-fidelity quantum logic gates using trapped-ion hyperfine qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 060504 (2016). Also see Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.060504
  12. 12.
    E. Knill, Physics: quantum computing. Nature 463(7280), 441–443 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T.D. Ladd, F. Jelezko, R. Laflamme, Y. Nakamura, C. Monroe, J.L. O’Brien, Quantum computers. Nature 464, 45–53 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Leibfried, R. Blatt, C. Monroe, D. Wineland, Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75(1), 281–324 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    K.R. Brown, A.C. Wilson, Y. Colombe, C. Ospelkaus, A.M. Meier, E. Knill, D. Leibfried, D.J. Wineland, Single-qubit-gate error below \(10^{-4}\) in a trapped ion. Phys. Rev. A 84, 030303 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T.P. Harty, D.T.C. Allcock, C.J. Ballance, L. Guidoni, H.A. Janacek, N.M. Linke, D.N. Stacey, D.M. Lucas, High-fidelity preparation, gates, memory, and readout of a trapped-ion quantum bit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 220501 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    T.R. Tan, J.P. Gaebler, Y. Lin, Y. Wan, R. Bowler, D. Leibfried, D.J. Wineland, Multi-element logic gates for trapped-ion qubits. Nature 528(7582), 380–383 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    T.R. Tan, J.P. Gaebler, R. Bowler, Y. Lin, J.D. Jost, D. Leibfried, D.J. Wineland, Demonstration of a dressed-state phase gate for trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 263002 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A.C. Wilson, Y. Colombe, K.R. Brown, E. Knill, D. Leibfried, D.J. Wineland, Tunable spin–spin interactions and entanglement of ions in separate potential wells. Nature 512(7512), 57–60 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. Schindler, D. Nigg, T. Monz, J.T. Barreiro, E. Martinez, S.X. Wang, S. Quint, M.F. Brandl, V. Nebendahl, C.F. Roos et al., A quantum information processor with trapped ions. N. J. Phys. 15(12), 123012 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    N. Akerman, N. Navon, S. Kotler, Y. Glickman, R. Ozeri, Universal gate-set for trapped-ion qubits using a narrow linewidth diode laser. N. J. Phys. 17(11), 113060 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Z. Meir, O. Schwartz, E. Shahmoon, D. Oron, R. Ozeri, Cooperative Lamb shift in a mesoscopic atomic array. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 193002 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Thom, G. Wilpers, E. Riis, A.G. Sinclair, Accurate and agile digital control of optical phase, amplitude and frequency for coherent atomic manipulation of atomic systems. Opt. Express 21, 18712–18723 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. Theocharous, E.M. Wareham, Ultra-high performance photodetection systems for radiometric applications. Meas. Sci. Technol. 15(6), 1216 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    E. Theocharous, J. Ishii, N.P. Fox, Absolute linearity measurements on HgCdTe detectors in the infrared region. Appl. Opt. 43, 4182–4188 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    E. Theocharous, Absolute linearity measurements on a PbS detector in the infrared. Appl. Opt. 45, 2381–2386 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    E. Theocharous, M.A. Itzler, J. Cheung, C.J. Chunnilall, Characterization of the linearity of response and spatial uniformity of response of two InGaAsP/InP Geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes. IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 46, 1561–1567 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    C.F. Roos, Ion trap quantum gates with amplitude-modulated laser beams. N. J. Phys. 10(1), 013002 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    D.B. Leviton, B.J. Frey, Temperature-dependent absolute refractive index measurements of synthetic fused silica. Proc. SPIE 6273, 62732K–62732K–11 (2006)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    B.J. Frey, D.B. Leviton, T.J. Madison, Q. Gong, M. Tecza, Cryogenic temperature-dependent refractive index measurements of N-BK7, BaLKN3, SF15, and E-SF03. Proc. SPIE6692, 669205–669205–12 (2007)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    D. Allan, Statistics of atomic frequency standards. Proc. IEEE 54, 221–230 (1966)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
    R. Walder, D.H. Paik, M.S. Bull, C. Sauer, T.T. Perkins, Ultrastable measurement platform: sub-nm drift over hours in 3d at room temperature. Opt. Express 23, 16554–16564 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    E. Mount, C. Kabytayev, S. Crain, R. Harper, S.-Y. Baek, G. Vrijsen, S.T. Flammia, K.R. Brown, P. Maunz, J. Kim, Error compensation of single-qubit gates in a surface-electrode ion trap using composite pulses. Phys. Rev. A 92, 060301 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    G. Wilpers, P. See, P. Gill, A.G. Sinclair, A monolithic array of three-dimensional ion traps fabricated with conventional semiconductor technology. Nat. Nanotech. 7, 572–576 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    G. Wilpers, P. See, P. Gill, A.G. Sinclair, A compact UHV package for microfabricated ion-trap arrays with direct electronic air-side access. Appl. Phys. B 111(1), 21–28 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    K. Mølmer, A. Sørensen, Multiparticle entanglement of hot trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1835–1838 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    A. Sørensen, K. Mølmer, Entanglement and quantum computation with ions in thermal motion. Phys. Rev. A 62, 022311 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    G. Kirchmair, J. Benhelm, F. Zhringer, R. Gerritsma, C.F. Roos, R. Blatt, Deterministic entanglement of ions in thermal states of motion. N. J. Phys. 11(2), 023002 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    C.F. Roos, Private communicationGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    M. Palmero, S. Martínez-Garaot, D. Leibfried, D.J. Wineland, J.G. Muga, Fast phase gates with trapped ions. Phys. Rev. A 95, 022328 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    J. Mizrahi, B. Neyenhuis, K.G. Johnson, W.C. Campbell, C. Senko, D. Hayes, C. Monroe, Quantum control of qubits and atomic motion using ultrafast laser pulses. Appl. Phys. B 114(1), 45–61 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    P. See, G. Wilpers, P. Gill, A.G. Sinclair, Fabrication of a monolithic array of three dimensional Si-based ion traps. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 22, 1180–1189 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Physical LaboratoryTeddingtonUK
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsImperial CollegeLondonUK
  4. 4.M Squared LasersGlasgowUK
  5. 5.Department of PhysicsUniversity of Oxford, Clarendon LaboratoryOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations