Applied Physics B

, 123:246 | Cite as

Flame imaging using planar laser induced fluorescence of sulfur dioxide

  • Rene HonzaEmail author
  • Carl-Philipp Ding
  • Andreas Dreizler
  • Benjamin Böhm
Rapid Communication


Laser induced fluorescence of sulfur dioxide (SO2-PLIF) has been demonstrated as a useful tool for flame imaging. Advantage was taken from the strong temperature dependence of the SO2 fluorescence signal. SO2 fluorescence intensity increases by more than one order of magnitude if the temperature changes from ambient conditions to adiabatic flame temperatures of stoichiometric methane–air flames. This results in a steep gradient of SO2-PLIF intensities at the reaction zone and therefore can be used as a reliable flame marker. SO2 can be excited electronically using the fourth-harmonic of an Nd:YAG laser at 266 nm. This is an attractive alternative to OH-LIF, a well-recognized flame front marker, because no frequency-doubled dye lasers are needed. This simplifies the experimental setup and is advantageous for measurements at high repetition rates where dye bleaching can become an issue. To prove the performance of this approach, SO2-PLIF measurements were performed simultaneously with OH-PLIF on laminar premixed methane-air Bunsen flames for equivalence ratios between 0.9 and 1.25. These measurements were compared to 1D laminar flamelet simulations. The SO2 fluorescence signal was found to follow the temperature rise of the flame and is located closer to the steep temperature gradient than OH. Finally, the combined SO2- and OH-PLIF setup was applied to a spark ignition IC-engine to visualize the development of the early flame kernel.



The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) through SFB-Transregio 150. The ambitious support of M. Schroers and S. Franek is appreciated.


  1. 1.
    J. Wolfrum, Lasers in combustion. Symp. (Int.) Combust. 27(1), 1–41 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P.G. Aleiferis, A.M.K.P. Taylor, J.H. Whitelaw, K. Ishii, Y. Urata, Cyclic Variations of Initial Flame Kernel Growth in a Honda VTEC-E Lean-Burn Spark-Ignition Engine, SAE Paper 2000-01-1207, 2000Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Heeger, B. Böhm, S.F. Ahmed, R. Gordon, I. Boxx, W. Meier, A. Dreizler, E. Mastorakos, Statistics of relative and absolute velocities of turbulent non-premixed edge flames following spark ignition. Proc. Combust. Inst. 32(2), 2957–2964 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Peterson, E. Baum, B. Böhm, A. Dreizler, Early flame propagation in a spark-ignition engine measured with quasi 4D-diagnostics. Proc. Combust. Inst. 35(3), 3829–3837 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Boeckle, J. Kazenwadel, T. Kunzelmann, D.-I. Shin, C. Schulz, Single-shot laser-induced fluorescence imaging of formaldehyde with XeF excimer excitation. Appl. Phys. B 70(5), 733–735 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. Bergmann, W. Meier, D. Wolff, W. Stricker, Application of spontaneous Raman and Rayleigh scattering and 2D LIF for the characterization of a turbulent CH 4/H 2/N 2 jet diffusion flame. Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt. 66(4), 489–502 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E.P. Hassel, S. Linow, Laser diagnostics for studies of turbulent combustion. Meas. Sci. Technol. 11(2), R37 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.J. Dyer, D.R. Crosley, Two-dimensional imaging of OH laser-induced fluorescence in a flame. Opt. Lett. 7(8), 382 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Ketterle, M. Schaefer, A. Arnold, J. Wolfrum, 2D single-shot imaging of OH radicals using tunable excimer lasers. Appl. Phys. B Photophys. Laser Chem. 54(2), 109–112 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Kittler, A. Dreizler, Cinematographic imaging of hydroxyl radicals in turbulent flames by planar laser-induced fluorescence up to 5 kHz repetition rate. Appl. Phys. B 89(2–3), 163–166 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S.H.R. Müller, B. Böhm, M. Gleißner, S. Arndt, A. Dreizler, Analysis of the temporal flame kernel development in an optically accessible IC engine using high-speed OH-PLIF. Appl. Phys. B 100(3), 447–452 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. Fukui, T. Fujikawa, M. Tohyama, Y. Hattori, K. Akihama, 2-D Internal EGR Distribution Measurements in an Engine by Laser-Induced Fluorescence. SAE Int. J. Engines 6(1), 289–299 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    G.M. Johnson, C.J. Matthews, M.Y. Smith, D.J. Williams, Distribution of sulfur species in the burnt gas of fuel-rich propane-air flames. Combust. Flame 15(2), 211–214 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. Sick, Exhaust-gas imaging via planar laser- induced fluorescence of sulfur dioxide. Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt. 74(4–5), 461–463 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Luque, & D.R. Crosley, LIFBASE: Database and spectral simulation program. Version 1.5, SRI International report MP 99-009 (SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, 1999) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. Baum, B. Peterson, B. Böhm, A. Dreizler, On the validation of LES applied to internal combustion engine flows. Flow, Turbul Combust 92(1–2), 269–297 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    CHEMID, A one-dimensional laminar frame code. (Eindhoven University of Technology, 2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Göttgens, F. Mauss, N. Peters, Analytic approximations of burning velocities and flame thicknesses of lean hydrogen, methane, ethylene, ethane, acetylene, and propane flames. Symp. (Int.) Combust. 24(1), 129–135 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Reactive Flows and Diagnostics (RSM)Technische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations