Applied Physics B

, 123:79 | Cite as

Practical correction of a phase-aberrated laser beam using a triphenyldiamine-based photorefractive composite

Article
  • 89 Downloads

Abstract

A photorefractive composite based on a triphenyldiamine (TPD) derivative was used to restore a severely phase-aberrated laser beam to a nearly aberration-free state. Here, a forward degenerate four-wave mixing geometry was employed for the elimination of phase distortions and its practical applicability in the transmission of optically encoded data is demonstrated. In addition, it is demonstrated that the experimental geometry is able to effectively restore dynamically updating images. Conventional two-beam coupling and degenerate four-wave mixing experiments were used to characterize the composite subject to the current experimental setup. The two-beam coupling net gain coefficient was 100 cm−1 with an applied external electric field of 70 V/µm. Internal and external diffraction efficiencies of 10 and 6%, respectively, were observed with a similar external electric field. Due to its superior charge-carrier mobility, the TPD-based composite exhibited a response time of 0.28 s, approximately five times faster than traditional PVK-based composites.

Keywords

Probe Beam Polarize Beam Splitter Current Experimental Condition Phase Aberration Optical Aperture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the Materials Research Center at the Missouri University of Science and Technology, the Department of Chemistry at the Missouri University of Science and Technology, and the Missouri Research Board.

Supplementary material

340_2017_6641_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 2394 KB)
340_2017_6641_MOESM2_ESM.avi (1.5 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (AVI 1522 KB)
340_2017_6641_MOESM3_ESM.avi (1.7 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (AVI 1711 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    S. Niu, J. Shen, C. Liang, Y. Zhang, B. Li, Appl. Opt 50, 4365 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Baskaran, R. Rosen, P. Lewis, P. Unsbo, J. Gustafsson, Optom. Vis. Sci 89, 1417 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Li, M. Eralp, J. Thomas, S. Tay, A. Schulzgen, R.A. Norwood, N. Peyghambarian. Appl. Phys. Lett 86, 161103 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Winiarz, F. Ghebremichael, Appl. Opt 43, 3166 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Winiarz, F. Ghebremichael, Opt. Express 12, 2517 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Chiou, P. Yeh, Opt. Lett 10, 621 (1985)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Chiou, P. Yeh, Opt. Lett 11, 461 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Ducharme, J. Scott, R. Twieg, W.E. Moerner, Phys. Rev. Lett 66, 1846 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Köber, M. Salvador, K. Meerholz, Adv. Mater 23, 4725 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Ogino, T. Nomura, T. Shichi, S. Park, H. Sato, Chem. Mater 9, 2768 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Thomas, R.A. Norwood, N. Peyghambarian, J. Mater. Chem 19, 7476 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Thomas, C. Fuentes-Hernandez, M. Yamamoto, K. Camnack, K. Matsumoto, G. Walker, S. Barlow, B. Kippelen, G. Meredith, S. Marder. Adv. Mater 16, 2032 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    P.K. Nayak, N. Agarwal, N. Periasamy, M.P. Patankar, K.L. Narasimhan. Synth. Met 160, 722 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    W.E. Moerner, S. Silence, F. Hache, G. Bjorklund. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 11, 320 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Y. Liang, J. Moon, R. Mu, J.G. Winiarz. J. Mater. Chem 3, 4134 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M.A. Lediju, G.E. Trahey, B.C. Byram, B.J. Dahl, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelect. FrEq. Control 58, 1377 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    V. Lemberg, U.S. Patent 6793654 B2, Sep 21, (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. W. Goodman: introduction to Fourier optics. 2nd edn. (McGraw-Hill, San Francisco 1996)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Meerholz, B.L. Volodin, B. Sandalphon, Kippelen, A. N. Peyghambarian. Nature 371, 497 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    V. Herrera-Ambriz, J. Maldonado, M. Rodriguez, R. Castro-Beltran, G. Ramos-Ortiz, N. Magana-Vergara, M. Meneses-Nava, O. Barbosa-Garcia, R. Santillan, N. Farfan, F. Dang, P.G. Lacroix, I. Ledoux-Rak. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 23955 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Moon, Y. Liang, T.E. Stevens, T.C. Monson, D.L. Huber, B.D. Mahala, J.G. Winiarz, J. Phys. Chem. C 119(24), 13827 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    W.E. Moerner, S.M. Silence, Chem. Rev 94, 127 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    D.R. Iskander, M.J. Collins, M.R. Morelande, M. Zhu, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng 11, 1969 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryMissouri University of Science and TechnologyRollaUSA

Personalised recommendations