Advertisement

Applied Physics B

, Volume 114, Issue 1–2, pp 137–145 | Cite as

Toward a more accurate Q value measurement of tritium: status of THe-Trap

  • S. StreubelEmail author
  • T. Eronen
  • M. Höcker
  • J. Ketter
  • M. Schuh
  • R. S. Van DyckJr.
  • K. Blaum
Article

Abstract

The goal of the THe-Trap experiment is to measure the tritium/helium-3 mass ratio in order to deduce the Q value of the tritium β-decay. A relative uncertainty of 10 parts per trillion in the mass ratio would allow determining the Q value with a precision of 30 meV. This value is of relevance for the Karlsruhe Tritium Neutrino (KATRIN) collaboration, which is building a spectrometer to measure the mass of the electron antineutrino. In this contribution, we present the progress made in the past 2 years. We can, e.g., store, manipulate and detect single ions. To demonstrate the current accuracy, we measured the carbon-12 to oxygen-16 mass ratio with a relative uncertainty of 120 parts per trillion in early 2013. The improvements, current status and future perspectives will be presented.

Keywords

Tritium Neutrino Mass Cyclotron Frequency Axial Frequency Radial Frequency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft and the ERC-Grant Measurements of Fundamental Constants (MEFUCO). T.E. was supported by a fellowship of the Alexander von Humboldt foundation. S.S. acknowledges support by the Heidelberg Graduate School of Fundamental Physics (HGSFP). J.K. acknowledges support by the HGSFP and by the International Max Planck Research School for Precision Tests of Fundamental Symmetries (IMPRS-PTFS). We thank David B. Pinegar and Christoph Diehl for earlier contributions.

References

  1. 1.
    R.S. Van Dyck, Jr., D. B. Pinegar, S. Van Liew, S.L. Zafonte, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 251, 231 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angrik, J., et al., Technical report, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) (unpublished)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. Aseev, et al., Phys. At. Nucl. 75, 464 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Kraus, et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 40, 447 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E.W. Otten, C. Weinheimer, Rep. Prog. Phys. 71, 086201 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.A. Thomas, F.B. Abdalla, O. Lahav, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 031301 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Riemer-Sørensen, et al., Phys. Rev. D 85, 081101 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H.V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, I.V. Krivosheina, A. Dietz, O. Chkvorets, Phys. Lett. B 586, 198 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Agostini, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 122503 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Eliseev, T. Eronen, Yu. Novikov, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 349–350, 102 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Otten, J. Bonn, C. Weinheimer, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 251, 173 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Zbořil, et al., J. Instrum. 8, P03009 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Rainville, J.K. Thompson, D.E. Pritchard, Science 303, 334 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E.G. Myers, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 349–350, 107 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sz. Nagy, et al., Europhys. Lett. 74, 404 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Gräff, H. Kalinowsky, J. Traut, Zeitschrift für Physik A Atoms and Nuclei 297, 35 (1980)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. König, et al., Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 142, 95 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M.L.E. Oliphant, P. Harteck, L. Rutherford, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 144, 692 (1934)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    G.C. Hanna, B. Pontecorvo, Phys. Rev. 75, 983 (1949)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    L.G. Smith, A.H. Wapstra, Phys. Rev. C 11, 1392 (1975)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    R.S. Van Dyck, Jr., D.L. Farnham, P.B. Schwinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2888 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    D.B. Pinegar, Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington, 2007Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    D.B. Pinegar, S.L. Zafonte, R.S. Van Dyck, Jr., Hyperfine Interact. 174, 47 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    C. Diehl, et al., Hyperfine Interact. 199, 291 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    R.S. Van Dyck, Jr., et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 220802 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    L.S. Brown, G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. A 25, 2423 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. Repp, et al., Appl. Phys. B 107, 983 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    C. Roux, et al., Appl. Phys. B 107, 997 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    D.B. Pinegar, et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80, 064701 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ch. Böhm, et al., to be publishedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    R.S. Van Dyck, Jr., D.L. Farnham, S.L. Zafonte, P.B. Schwinberg, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70, 1665 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    G. Gabrielse, J. Tan, J. Appl. Phys. 63, 5143 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    R.S. Van Dyck, Jr., F.L. Moore, D.L. Farnham, P.B. Schwinberg, Phys. Rev. A 40, 6308 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    C. Diehl, Ph.D. thesis, Ruperto-Carola-University of Heidelberg, Germany, 2011Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    L.S. Brown, G. Gabrielse, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 233 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    F.L. Moore, et al., Phys. Rev. A 46, 2653 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    W.M. Haynes, (ed.) Ionization energies of atoms and atomic ions. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 93rd edn, (Internet Version 2013), (CRC Press/Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, 2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Streubel
    • 1
    Email author
  • T. Eronen
    • 1
  • M. Höcker
    • 1
  • J. Ketter
    • 1
  • M. Schuh
    • 1
  • R. S. Van DyckJr.
    • 2
  • K. Blaum
    • 1
  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for Nuclear PhysicsHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Physics DepartmentUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations