Sooting turbulent jet flame: characterization and quantitative soot measurements
- 697 Downloads
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelers require high-quality experimental data sets for validation of their numerical tools. Preferred features for numerical simulations of a sooting, turbulent test case flame are simplicity (no pilot flame), well-defined boundary conditions, and sufficient soot production. This paper proposes a non-premixed C2H4/air turbulent jet flame to fill this role and presents an extensive database for soot model validation.
The sooting turbulent jet flame has a total visible flame length of approximately 400 mm and a fuel-jet Reynolds number of 10,000. The flame has a measured lift-off height of 26 mm which acts as a sensitive marker for CFD model validation, while this novel compiled experimental database of soot properties, temperature and velocity maps are useful for the validation of kinetic soot models and numerical flame simulations. Due to the relatively simple burner design which produces a flame with sufficient soot concentration while meeting modelers’ needs with respect to boundary conditions and flame specifications as well as the present lack of a sooting “standard flame”, this flame is suggested as a new reference turbulent sooting flame.
The flame characterization presented here involved a variety of optical diagnostics including quantitative 2D laser-induced incandescence (2D-LII), shifted-vibrational coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy (SV-CARS), and particle image velocimetry (PIV). Producing an accurate and comprehensive characterization of a transient sooting flame was challenging and required optimization of these diagnostics. In this respect, we present the first simultaneous, instantaneous PIV, and LII measurements in a heavily sooting flame environment. Simultaneous soot and flow field measurements can provide new insights into the interaction between a turbulent vortex and flame chemistry, especially since soot structures in turbulent flames are known to be small and often treated in a statistical manner.
KeywordsSoot Jet flame Laser diagnostics Turbulent combustion Laser-induced incandescence Validation data
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection, Working Group 3, CAEP/7-IP/6, Montreal, Canada (2007) Google Scholar
- 2.A. Petzold, R. Marsh, M. Johnson, M. Miller, Y. Sevcenco, D. Delhaye, X. Vancassel, A. Ibrahim, A. Veira, P. Williams, H. Bauer, A. Crayford, S. Morris, P. Kay, P. Bowen, W.D. Bachalo, D. Raper, Final report, EASA.2008.OP.13, EASA Cologne (2009) Google Scholar
- 3.Society of Automotive Engineers Inc, AIR 5892 (2004) Google Scholar
- 4.Society of Automotive Engineers Inc, AIR 6037 (2009) Google Scholar
- 5.W. Lazik, T. Doerr, S. Bake, R. von der Bank, L. Rackwitz, in Proc. ASME Turbo Expo 2008, Power for Land, Sea and Air, 09–13.06.2008, Berlin, Paper GT2008-51115 (2008) Google Scholar
- 6.H. Richter, M. Braun-Unkhoff, S. Granata, J. Yu, E. Goos, N. Slavinskaya, P. Frank, W. Green, J. Howard, in Proc. European Combustion Meeting ECM2005, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, Paper 163 (2005) Google Scholar
- 10.S. Granata, F. Cambianica, S. Zinesi, T. Faravelli, E. Ranzi, in Proc. European Combustion Meeting ECM2005 (Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium), Paper 035 (2005) Google Scholar
- 15.M. Di Domenico, PhD thesis Universität Stuttgart (2008) http://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/opus/volltexte/2008/3624/pdf/DiDomenico_Doktorarbeit.pdf
- 24.TNF Workshop web site, available at http://www.ca.sandia.gov/TNF Sandia National Laboratories (2010)
- 35.C.R. Shaddix, J. Zhang, R.W. Schefer, Conference Paper LACSEA, OSA (2010) Google Scholar
- 38.C.K. Westbrook, F.L. Dryer, K.P. Schug, Proc. Combust. Inst. 19, 153 (1998) Google Scholar
- 39.R.J. Santoro, C.R. Shaddix, in Applied Combustion Diagnostics, ed. by K. Kohse-Höinghaus, J.B. Jeffries (Taylor & Francis, New York, 2002) Google Scholar
- 47.A. Coderre, Master thesis, Carlton University, Ottawa (2009) Google Scholar