Effect of the wavelength dependence of the emissivity on inferred soot temperatures measured by spectrally resolved laser-induced incandescence
- 514 Downloads
Flame-generated soot was heated using a pulsed laser, and temperatures of the irradiated soot were inferred by fitting the Planck function to spectrally resolved laser-induced incandescence with the temperature as an adjustable parameter. The effect of the wavelength dependence of the emissivity on the inferred temperatures of the irradiated soot was studied using selected expressions for the soot emissivity in the fit. Depending upon the choice of the functional form of the emissivity, the maximum temperature reached by the soot during the laser pulse was calculated to span a range of 341 K (3475–3816 K) at a 1064-nm laser fluence of 0.1 J/cm2 and 456 K (4115–4571 K) at a 1064-nm laser fluence of 0.4 J/cm2 with a 1σ standard deviation about the mean of ∼25 K. Comparison of the present results with temperature measurements from previous studies suggests that the emissivity may depend on flame conditions and that further investigation on the subject is needed. The use of two-color or spectrally resolved LII to infer the soot temperature during or after laser heating requires a careful characterization of the wavelength dependence of the emissivity. The spread in temperature leads to large uncertainties regarding the physico-chemical processes occurring at the surface of the soot during the laser heating.
KeywordsEmissivity Laser Heating Wavelength Dependence Soot Volume Fraction Soot Emission
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.R.J. Santoro, C.R. Shaddix, in Applied Combustion Diagnostics, ed. by K. Kohse-Höinghaus, J.B. Jeffries (Taylor & Francis, London, 2002), p. 252 Google Scholar
- 6.R.T. Wainner, J.M. Seitzman, Soot diagnostics using laser-induced incandescence in flames and exhaust flows, in 37th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (AIAA, 1999), AIAA 99 Google Scholar
- 8.J.P. Schwarz, R.S. Gao, D.W. Fahey, D.S. Thomson, L.A. Watts, J.C. Wilson, J.M. Reeves, M. Darbeheshti, D.G. Baumgardner, G.L. Kok, S.H. Chung, M. Schulz, J. Hendricks, A. Lauer, B. Karcher, J.G. Slowik, K.H. Rosenlof, T.L. Thompson, A.O. Langford, M. Loewenstein, K.C. Aikin, J. Geophys. Res. D 111, D16207 (2006) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 22.F. Goulay, P.E. Schrader, H.A. Michelsen, In preparation Google Scholar
- 24.H.A. Michelsen, F. Liu, B.F. Kock, H. Bladh, A. Boiarciuc, M. Charwath, T. Dreier, R. Hadef, M. Hofmann, J. Reimann, S. Will, P.-E. Bengtsson, H. Bockhorn, F. Foucher, K.P. Geigle, C. Mounaïm-Rousselle, C. Schulz, R. Stirn, B. Tribalet, R. Suntz, Appl. Phys. B 87, 503 (2007) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 25.M. Kerker, The Scattering of Light and Other Electromagnetic Radiation. Physical Chemistry: A Series of Monographs, vol. 16 (Academic Press, San Diego, 1969) Google Scholar
- 35.A. Borghesi, G. Guizzetti, in Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids II, ed. by E.D. Palik (Academic Press, San Diego, 1998), p. 449 Google Scholar