Applied Physics B

, Volume 99, Issue 1–2, pp 23–30 | Cite as

Optimal strategy for trapping single fluorescent molecules in solution using the ABEL trap



Trapping of 10-nm-sized single fluorescent bio-molecules in solution has been achieved using high-speed position sensing and electrokinetic feedback forces in the Anti-Brownian ELectrokinetic (ABEL) trap. The high diffusion coefficient of small objects in solution requires very fast, real-time sensing of position, and this has been previously achieved using a simple rotating beam, but improved strategies are needed for the smallest objects, such as single nanometer-sized fluorescent molecules. At the same time, single molecules are limited in photon emission rate and total number of photons, so each emitted photon must be used as efficiently as possible. We describe a new controller design for the ABEL trap which features fast, knight’s tour scanning of an excitation beam on a 2D square lattice and a Kalman filter-based estimator for optimal position sensing. This strategy leads directly to a maximum-likelihood-based method to extract the diffusion coefficient of the object held in the trap. The effectiveness of the algorithms are demonstrated and compared to the simple rotating beam design through Monte Carlo simulations. Our new approach yields tighter trapping and a much improved ability to extract diffusion coefficients.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    H. Cang, C.S. Xu, H. Yang, Chem. Phys. Lett. 457, 285 (2008) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. McHale, A.J. Berglund, H. Mabuchi, Nano Lett. 7(11), 3535 (2007) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Cang, C.S. Xu, D. Montiel, H. Yang, Opt. Lett 32(18), 2729 (2007) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.E. Cohen, W.E. Moerner, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 093109 (2005) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.E. Cohen, W.E. Moerner, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103(12), 4362 (2006) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.E. Cohen, W.E. Moerner, Opt. Exp. 16(10), 6941 (2008) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.E. Cohen, W.E. Moerner, Proc. SPIE 5699, 296 (2005) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Jiang, Q. Wang, A.E. Cohen, N. Douglas, J. Frydman, W.E. Moerner, Proc. SPIE 7038(703807) (2008) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Enderlein, Appl. Phys. B 71, 773 (2000) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A.J. Berglund, H. Mabuchi, Appl. Phys. B 78, 653 (2004) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.J. Berglund, H. Mabuchi, Appl. Phys. B 83(1), 127 (2006) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. Levi, Q. Ruan, E. Gratton, Biophys. J. 88, 2919 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S.B. Andersson, Appl. Phys. B 80, 809 (2005) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Cang, C.M. Wong, C.S. Xu, A.H. Rizvi, H. Yang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 223901 (2006) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A.J. Berglund, K. McHale, H. Mabuchi, Opt. Exp. 15(12), 7752 (2007) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. Simon, Optimal State Estimation: Kalman, H Infinity, and Nonlinear Approaches (Wiley, New York, 2006) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Magde, W.W. Webb, E.L. Elson, Biopolymers 17(2), 361 (1978) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Stockton, M. Armen, H. Mabuchi, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19(12), 3019 (2002) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. Vučinić, T.J. Sejnowski, PLoS ONE 2(8), e699 (2007) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.T. Tyn, T.W. Gusek, Biotech. Bioeng. 35(4), 327 (1989) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Electrical Engineering and ChemistryStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Departments of Chemistry and Applied PhysicsStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations