Applied Physics B

, Volume 97, Issue 1, pp 135–143 | Cite as

6×6 matrix formalism of optical elements for modeling and analyzing 3D optical systems

Article

Abstract

Although conventional 2×2 ray matrices, i.e. ABCD matrices, provide a convenient means of obtaining initial estimates of the performance of an optical system during the early stages of the design process, they are suitable only for optical systems with the axisymmetric property. Accordingly, this study utilizes the 6×6 matrix formalism, which was proposed by our group, for optical boundary surfaces to develop a new approach for modeling and analyzing 3D optical systems comprising multiple lenses and/or mirrors and clarifying many of the system’s basic properties, e.g. the effective focal length, primary aberration and cardinal points, and so forth. To reduce the complexity of the modeling process, general matrix formalisms of sub-systems in a 3D optical system are presented. The validity of the proposed approach is evaluated by modeling and analyzing a simple 3D optical system and comparing the results with those obtained from the skew ray-tracing computer program and commercial optical design software. The results confirm that the proposed methodology provides a convenient means of obtaining initial insights into a variety of 3D optical systems with non-coplanar axes.

PACS

42.15.-i 42.15.Eq 42.15.Fr 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W. Brower, Matrix Method in Optical Instrument Design (Benjamin, Elmsford, 1964) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Gerrad, J.M. Burch, Introduction to Matrix Method in Optics (Wiley, New York, 1975) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Wang, D. Zhao, Matrix Optics (Springer, Berlin, 2000) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Nazarathy, J. Shamir, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72, 356 (1982) CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Macukow, H.H. Arsenault, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 73, 1360 (1983) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L.W. Casperson, J. Appl. Opt. 20, 2243 (1981) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.A. Tovar, L.W. Casperson, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 882 (1997) CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.E. Attard, J. Appl. Opt. 23, 2706 (1984) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.A. Rodrigo, T. Alieva, M.L. Calvo, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23, 2494 (2006) CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C.Y. Tsai, P.D. Lin, Appl. Phys. B 91, 105 (2008) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. Agrawal, A. Bhardwaj, S. Pal, A. Kumar, Appl. Phys. B 89, 349 (2007) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. Hansel, J. Müller, C. Falldorf, C. Von Kopylow, W. Jüptner, R. Grunwald, G. Steinmeyer, U. Griebner, Appl. Phys. B 89, 513 (2007) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    P.D. Lin, C.-K. Sung, OPTIK 117, 329 (2006) ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanROC

Personalised recommendations