Nitric oxide concentration measurements in atmospheric pressure flames using electronic-resonance-enhanced coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering
- 204 Downloads
We report the application of electronic-resonance-enhanced coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (ERE-CARS) for measurements of nitric oxide concentration ([NO]) in three different atmospheric pressure flames. Visible pump (532 nm) and Stokes (591 nm) beams are used to probe the Q-branch of the Raman transition. A significant resonance enhancement is obtained by tuning an ultraviolet probe beam (236 nm) into resonance with specific rotational transitions in the (v’=0, v”=1) vibrational band of the A2Σ+–X2Π electronic system of NO. ERE-CARS spectra are recorded at various heights within a hydrogen-air flame producing relatively low concentrations of NO over a Hencken burner. Good agreement is obtained between NO ERE-CARS measurements and the results of flame computations using UNICORN, a two-dimensional flame code. Excellent agreement between measured and calculated NO spectra is also obtained when using a modified version of the Sandia CARSFT code for heavily sooting acetylene-air flames (φ=0.8 to φ=1.6) on the same Hencken burner. Finally, NO concentration profiles are measured using ERE-CARS in a laminar, counter-flow, non-premixed hydrogen-air flame. Spectral scans are recorded by probing the Q1 (9.5), Q1 (13.5) and Q1 (17.5) Raman transitions. The measured shape of the [NO] profile is in good agreement with that predicted using the OPPDIF code, even without correcting for collisional effects. These comparisons between [NO] measurements and predictions establish the utility of ERE-CARS for detection of NO in flames with large temperature and concentration gradients as well as in sooting environments.
KeywordsNitric Oxide Probe Beam Burner Surface Raman Transition Fuel Tube
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 13.B. Attal-Tretout, S.C. Schmidt, E. Crete, P. Dumas, J.P. Taran, J. Quantum Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 43, 351 (1990)Google Scholar
- 23.V.R. Katta, L.P. Goss, W.M. Roquemore, Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluids Flow 4, 413 (1994)Google Scholar
- 24.A.E. Lutz, R.J. Kee, J.F. Grcar, Sandia National Laboratories, Report No. SAND96-8243 (1996)Google Scholar
- 25.R.J. Kee, J.A. Miller, G.H. Evans, G. Dixon-Lewis, Proc. Combust. Inst. 22, 1479 (1988)Google Scholar
- 26.G.P. Smith, D.M. Golden, M. Frenklach, N.W. Moriarty, B. Eiteneer, M. Goldenberg, C.T. Bowman, R.K. Hanson, S. Song, W.C. Gardiner Jr., V. Lissianski, Z. Qin, GRI Mechanism (version 3.0) http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri_mech/ (1999)Google Scholar
- 27.J.P. Gore, J. Lim, T. Takeno, X.L. Zhu, Proceedings of Fifth ASME/JSME Joint Thermal Engineering Conference, San Diego, CA, Paper AJTE99-6311 (1999)Google Scholar
- 28.R.E. Palmer, Sandia National Laboratories, Report No. SAND89-8206 (1989)Google Scholar
- 29.J. Luque, D.R. Crosley, SRI International, Report. No. MP99-009 (1999)Google Scholar
- 32.A.C. Eckbreth, Laser Diagnostics for Combustion Temperature and Species (Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam, 1996)Google Scholar
- 33.P.H. Paul, C.D. Carter, J.A. Gray, J.W. Thoman, M.R. Furlanetto, Sandia National Laboratories, Report No. SAND94-8237 (1995)Google Scholar