Applied Physics B

, 83:511 | Cite as

Advanced methods for the characterization of few-cycle light pulses: a comparison

  • G. Stibenz
  • C. Ropers
  • Ch. Lienau
  • Ch. Warmuth
  • A.S. Wyatt
  • I.A. Walmsley
  • G. Steinmeyer
Article

Abstract

We discuss and compare four methods for measuring the width and pulse profile of ultrashort pulses. For our comparison, we use stable sub-7 fs pulses from a Ti:sapphire oscillator. Interferometric autocorrelation, spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction (SPIDER), a spatially-encoded variant of SPIDER, and interferometric frequency-resolved optical gating (IFROG) are utilized for characterizing pulses from the oscillator. The methods are found to agree within 5% as far as determination of the pulse width is concerned. However, differences are observed in the satellite structure reconstructed by either method. The current state of the art of measuring ultrashort pulses with these methods is reviewed and current limitations, in particular for characterizing complex pulse shapes, are discussed.

References

  1. 1.
    D.J. Kane, R. Trebino, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-29, 571 (1993)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Trebino, K.W. De Long, D.N. Fittinghoff, J.N. Sweetser, M.A. Krumbügel, B.A. Richman, D.J. Kane, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68, 3277 (1997)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Trebino, Frequency-Resolved Optical Gating: The Measurement of Ultrashort Laser Pulses (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, 2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Iaconis, I.A. Walmsley, Opt. Lett. 23, 792 (1998)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Iaconis, I.A. Walmsley, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-35, 501 (1999)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Steinmeyer, D.H. Sutter, L. Gallmann, N. Matuschek, U. Keller, Science 286, 1507 (1999)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Steinmeyer, J. Opt. A 5, R1 (2003)ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.-C. Diels, E. Van Stryland, G. Benedict, Opt. Commun. 25, 93 (1978)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Keusters, H.-S. Tan, P. O’Shea, E. Zeek, R. Trebino, W.S. Warren, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20, 2226 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Stibenz, G. Steinmeyer, Opt. Express 12, 6319 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.-C. Tien, S. Kane, J. Squier, B. Kohler, K. Wilson, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 13, 1160 (1996)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Baltuška, M.S. Pshenichnikov, D.A. Wiersma, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-35, 459 (1999)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Gallmann, G. Steinmeyer, D.H. Sutter, N. Matuschek, U. Keller, Opt. Lett. 25, 269 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Stibenz, G. Steinmeyer, Opt. Express 13, 2617 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E.M. Kosik, A.S. Radunsky, I.A. Walmsley, C. Dorrer, Opt. Lett. 30, 326 (2005)CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Drescher, M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, G. Tempea, C. Spielmann, G.A. Reider, P.B. Corkum, F. Krausz, Science 291, 1923 (2001)CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G.G. Paulus, F. Grasbon, H. Walther, P. Villoresi, M. Nisoli, S. Stagira, E. Priori, S. De Silvestri, Nature 414, 182 (2001)CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A.S. Wyatt, I.A. Walmsley, G. Stibenz, G. Steinmeyer, “Spatially encoded arrangement for spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction of sub-10 fs pulses”, submitted to Opt. Lett. (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Naganuma, K. Mogi, H. Yamada, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-25, 1225 (1989)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J.-H. Chung, A.M. Weiner, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. QE-7, 656 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    L. Gallmann, D.H. Sutter, N. Matuschek, G. Steinmeyer, U. Keller, Appl. Phys. B 70, S67 (2000)ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. Baum, S. Lochbrunner, E. Riedle, Opt. Lett. 29, 210 (2004)CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    I. Amat-Roldán, I.G. Cormack, P. Loza-Alvarez, E.J. Gualda, D. Artigas, Opt. Express 12, 1169 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. Stibenz, G. Steinmeyer, “Structures of interferometric frequency-resolved optical gating”, accepted for publication in IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    K.W. DeLong, D.N. Fittinghoff, R. Trebino, B. Kohler, K. Wilson, Opt. Lett. 19, 2152 (1994)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    L. Gallmann, D.H. Sutter, N. Matuschek, G. Steinmeyer, U. Keller, Appl. Phys. B 70, S67 (2000)ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    I. Amat-Roldán, I.G. Cormack, P. Loza-Alvarez, D. Artigas, Opt. Lett. 30, 1063 (2005)CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Linden, H. Giessen, J. Kuhl, Phys. Stat. Solidi B 206, 119 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Stibenz
    • 1
  • C. Ropers
    • 1
  • Ch. Lienau
    • 1
  • Ch. Warmuth
    • 2
  • A.S. Wyatt
    • 3
  • I.A. Walmsley
    • 3
  • G. Steinmeyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Born-Institut für Nichtlineare Optik und UltrakurzzeitspektroskopieBerlinGermany
  2. 2.FEMTOLASERS Produktions GmbHViennaAustria
  3. 3.Clarendon LaboratoryUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations