Continuous-wave stimulated Raman gain spectroscopy with cavity ringdown detection
- 130 Downloads
- 7 Citations
Abstract
Cavity ringdown (CRD) spectroscopy is extended for the first time from its conventional optical-absorption mode of operation into the regime of coherent Raman spectroscopy. Continuous-wave (cw) stimulated Raman gain (SRG) spectra of the 2916.5-cm-1 ν1 rovibrational fundamental Raman band of methane (CH4) gas are measured, using tunable cw laser light at ∼1544 nm to probe ringdown decay from a rapidly swept optical cavity that is itself inside the cavity of a cw single-longitudinal-mode Nd:YAG ring laser operating at ∼1064.5 nm. The resulting change of ringdown decay rate is dependent on pump laser irradiance and is associated with Raman gain. Remarkably, such SRG-CRD resonances display ringdown times that are longer than in the off-resonance case, contrasting with the usual reduction of ringdown time associated with absorption and other loss processes.
Keywords
Raman Band Pump Laser Stimulate Raman Scattering Tunable Diode Laser Ringdown TimePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.K.W. Busch, M.A. Busch (eds.), Cavity-Ringdown Spectroscopy – An Ultratrace-Absorption Measurement Technique (ACS Symp. Ser. 720) (American Chemical Society, Washington, DC 1999)Google Scholar
- 2.G. Berden, R. Peeters, G. Meijer, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 19, 565 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.A.B. Harvey (ed.), Chemical Applications of Nonlinear Raman Spectroscopy (Academic, New York 1981)Google Scholar
- 4.P. Esherick, A. Owyoung, Adv. Infrared Raman Spectrosc. 9, 130 (1982)Google Scholar
- 5.P.N. Butcher, D. Cotter, The Elements of Nonlinear Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1990), Sect. 7.3, pp. 94–101, 203–207, 228–230Google Scholar
- 6.Y. He, B.J. Orr, Chem. Phys. Lett. 319, 131 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 7.Y. He, B.J. Orr, Chem. Phys. Lett. 335, 215 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 8.Y. He, B.J. Orr, Appl. Phys. B 75, 267 (2002)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 9.E.R. Crosson, K.N. Ricci, B.A. Richman, F.C. Chilese, T.G. Owano, R.A. Provencal, M.W. Todd, J. Glasser, A.A. Kachanov, B.A. Paldus, T.G. Spence, R.N. Zare, Anal. Chem. 74, 2003 (2002)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.J.B. Dudek, P.B. Tarsa, A. Velasquez, M. Wladyslawski, P. Rabinowitz, K.K. Lehmann, Anal. Chem. 75, 4599 (2003)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.S. Cassi, D. Romanini, A. Campargue, B. Bussery-Honvault, Chem. Phys. Lett. 409, 281 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 12.H. Berger, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 66, 55 (1977)Google Scholar
- 13.A. Owyoung, C.W. Patterson, R.S. McDowell, Chem. Phys. Lett. 59, 156 (1978)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 14.A. Owyoung, CW stimulated Raman spectroscopy, Chap. 7, pp. 281–320 in [3] (1981)Google Scholar
- 15.J. Santos, P. Cancio, J.L. Domenech, J. Rodriguez, D. Bermejo, Laser Chem. 12, 53 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.H.W. Schrötter, H. Frunder, H. Berger, J.-P. Boquillon, B. Lavorel, G. Millot, in Advances in Non-Linear Spectroscopy (Adv. Spectrosc. 15), ed. by R.J.H. Clark, R.E. Hester (Wiley, New York 1982), pp. 104–108Google Scholar
- 17.H. Frunder, D. Illig, H. Finsterhölzl, H.W. Schrötter, B. Lavorel, J.C. Hilico, J.P. Champion, G. Pierre, G. Poussigue, E. Pascaud, Chem. Phys. Lett. 100, 110 (1983)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 18.J.-E. Lolck, Chem. Phys. Lett. 106, 143 (1984)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 19.L.S. Rothman, D. Jacquemart, A. Barbe, D.C. Benner, M. Birk, L.R. Brown, M.R. Carleer, C. Chackerian Jr., K. Chance, L.H. Coudert, V. Dana, V.M. Devi, J.-M. Flaud, R.R. Gamache, A. Goldman, J.-M. Hartmann, K.W. Jucks, A.G. Maki, J.-Y. Mandin, S.T. Massie, J. Orphal, A. Perrin, C.P. Rinsland, M.A.H. Smith, J. Tennyson, R.N. Tolchenov, R.A. Toth, J. Vander Auwera, P. Varanasi, G. Wagner, J. Quantum Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 96, 139 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 20.L.R. Brown, J. Quantum Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 96, 251 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar