Applied Physics B

, Volume 81, Issue 4, pp 525–530 | Cite as

Highly efficient Raman conversion in O2 pumped by a seeded narrow band second-harmonic Nd:YAG laser



The first-Stokes conversion efficiency for a stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) is usually very low in gaseous oxygen media. In 3.0 Mpa O2, a single longitudinal mode second harmonic Nd:YAG laser pump source gives a typical vibrational first-Stokes conversion efficiency of only 2.5%, In comparison, the accompanying stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) attains a reflectivity of 67%. However, by seeding an OPO beam into the Raman cavity, the first-Stokes photon conversion efficiency now attains a peak value of 54%, while the SBS reflectivity reduces to 5% in a 6.1 Mpa 41:59 O2/ He mixture. This 54% efficiency was obtained for a seeder laser pulse-width less than one half that of pump laser (6.8 ns). A first-Stokes peak power conversion efficiency as high as 88% has been obtained when the pump and seeder pulse peaks coincide. So, we may expect a higher first-Stokes photon conversion efficiency if the seeder pulse-width can be made equal to or larger than that of the pump pulse. On the other hand, the beam quality of the first-Stokes in an O2/ He mixture excels that of the pump laser for a seeder energy of 5 mJ and pump energy of 50 mJ. However, at pump energies higher than 105 mJ and a pump laser repetition rate of 10 Hz, the thermal defocusing effect worsens the first-Stokes beam quality. This thermal defocusing effect is a result of the Raman heat release and could be eliminated by fast circulating and cooling the Raman gas medium.

PACS 42.55.Ye 42.65.Dr 42.65.Es 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Z. Chu, U.N. Singh, T.D. Wikerson, Appl. Opt. 30, 4359 (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Sentrayan, A. Michael, V. Kushawaha, Appl. Opt. 32, 930 (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W.R. Lempert, B. Zhang, R.B. Miles, J. Opt. Soc. Soc. Am. B 7, 715 (1990)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Zhang, W.R. Lempert, R.B. Miles, Opt. Lett. 18, 1132 (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.C. Jones, M.S. Mangir, D.A. Rockwell, J.O. White, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 7, 2090 (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W.R. Trutna, JR. Y. Kwanpark, R.L. Byer, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE 15, 648 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Fedosejevs, I.V. Tomov, D.C.D. McKen, A.A. Offenberger, App. Phys. Lett. 45, 340 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    I.V. Tomov, R. Fedosejevs, D.C.D. McKen, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-21, 9 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Kaiser, M. Maier, The Laser Handbook (North-Holland, New York, 1972), vol. 2, p. 1077Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Drier, G. Schiff, A.A. Suvernev, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 6275 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Millot, C. Roche, R. Saint-Loup, R. Chaux, H. Berger, J. Santos, Chem. Phys. 173, 505 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Molecular Reaction DynamicsDalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of SciencesDalian

Personalised recommendations