Applied Physics B

, Volume 80, Issue 6, pp 645–654 | Cite as

Comparison of discharge lamp and laser pumped cesium magnetometers

  • S. GroegerEmail author
  • A. S. Pazgalev
  • A. Weis


We have performed a comparison of laser (LsOPM) and lamp (LpOPM) pumped cesium vapor magnetometers. Although the LsOPM operated 50% above its shot-noise limit we found an intrinsic sensitivity of 15 fT/√Hz and 25 fT/√Hz for the LsOPM and the LpOPM, respectively. Two modes of operation, viz. the phase-stabilized and the self-oscillating modes, were investigated and found to yield a similar performance. We have compared the performance of the LsOPM and the LpOPM directly by simultaneous measurements of field fluctuations of a 2-μT magnetic field inside a multilayer magnetic shield and have used one of the magnetometers for an active field stabilization. In the stabilized mode we found a gradient instability of 25 fT within an integration time of 100 s, which represents an upper limit of the long-term stability of the magnetometers. Our research is motivated by the need for an improved control of magnetic fields and gradients in a planned neutron electric dipole experiment.


07.55.Ge 32.30.Dx 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    K. Green, P.G. Harris, P. Iaydjiev, D.J.R. May, J.M. Pendlebury, K.F. Smith, M. van der Grinten, P. Geltenbort, S. Ivanov, Nuvl. Instr. and Meth. A 404, 381 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    I.S. Altarev, Y.V. Borisov, N.V. Borovikova, A.I. Egorov, S.N. Ivanov, E.A. Kolomensky, M.S. Lasakov, V.M. Lobashev, V.A. Nazarenko, A.N. Pirozhkov, A.P. Serebrov, Y.V. Sobolev, E.V. Shulgina, Phys. At. Nuclei 59, 1152 (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. Borisov, W. Heil, M. Leduc, V. Lobashev, E. Otten, Y. Sobolev, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 440, 48 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Groeger, J.-L. Schenker, R. Wynands, A. Weis, Phys. Rev. A, submitted [arXiv:physics/0406105 v2 19 August 2004]Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O. Moreau, B. Cheron, H. Gilles, J. Hamel, E. Noel, J. Phys. III 7, 99 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Gilles, J. Hamel, B. Cheron, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72, 2253 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.P. Kazantsev, V.S. Smirnow, A.M. Tumaikin, I.A. Yagofarov, Opt. Spectrosc. 57, 189 (1984)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E.B. Alexandrov, M.V. Balabas, D. Budker, D. English, D.F. Kimball, C.-H. Li, V.V. Yashchuk, Phys. Rev. A 66, 042903 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Breit, I.I. Rabi, Phys. Rev. 38, 2082 (1931)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V.V. Yashchuk, D. Budker, J.R. Davis, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71, 341 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Bison, R. Wynands, A. Weis, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 22, 77 (2005)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E.B. Aleksandrov, M.V. Balabas, A.K. Vershovskii, A.E. Ivanov, N.N. Yakobson, V.L. Velichanskii, N.V. Senkov, Opt. Spectrosc. 78, 325 (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.A. Barnes, A.R. Chi, L.S. Cutler, D.J. Healey, D.B. Leeson, T.E. McGunigal, J.A. Mullen, Jr., W.L. Smith, R.L. Sydnor, R.F.C. Vessot, G.M.R. Winkler, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 20, 105 (1971)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Nettels, R. Müller-Siebert, S. Ulzega, A. Weis, Appl. Phys. B 77, 563 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E.B. Alexandrov, A.S. Pazgalev, J.L. Rasson, Opt. Spectrosc. 82, 14 (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    I.K. Kominis, T.W. Kornack, J.C. Allred, M.V. Romalis, Nature 422, 596 (2003)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Physics DepartmentUniversité de FribourgFribourgSwitzerland
  2. 2.Paul Scherrer InstituteVilligen PSISwitzerland
  3. 3.Ioffe Physical Technical InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations