Applied Physics B

, Volume 80, Issue 3, pp 277–280

Controlling the spectral shape of coherent soft X-rays

  • T. Pfeifer
  • D. Walter
  • C. Winterfeldt
  • C. Spielmann
  • G. Gerber
Rapid Communication

Abstract

We demonstrate the generation of arbitrarily shaped spectra of coherent soft X-ray radiation by adaptive control of the driving laser pulse. The selection of both narrow and wide spectral ranges as well as suppression of high-harmonic emission in a selected wavelength region is achieved. Feedback-controlled spectral engineering of coherent soft X-rays paves the way to shaping of soft X-ray pulses and coherent control of electron dynamics in the sub-femtosecond regime.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. Baumert, M. Grosser, R. Thalweiser, G. Gerber Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3753 (1991)Google Scholar
  2. A.H. Zewail Femtochemistry, Vols. 1 and 2 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994)Google Scholar
  3. R.S. Judson, H. Rabitz Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1500 (1992)Google Scholar
  4. C. J. Bardeen, V. V. Yakovlev, K. R. Wilson, S. D. Carpenter, P. M. Weber, and W. S. Warren Chem. Phys. Lett. 280, 151 (1997).Google Scholar
  5. A. Assion et al. Science 282, 919 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. A.M. Weiner, D.E. Leaird, J.S. Patel, J.R. Wullert II Opt. Lett. 15, 326 (1990)Google Scholar
  7. M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, C. Spielmann, G. A. Reider, N. Milosevic, T. Brabec, P. Corkum, U. Heinzmann, M. Drescher, and F. Krausz Nature 414, 509 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. P.M. Paul et al. Science 292, 1689 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Drescher et al. Nature 419, 803 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. R. Kienberger et al. Science 297, 1144 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. P.B. Corkum Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. T. Brixner, G. Gerber Chem. Phys. Chem. 4, 418 (2003)Google Scholar
  13. S.A. Rice, M. Zhao Optical Control of Molecular Dynamics (Wiley, New York, 2000)Google Scholar
  14. M.E. Fermann et al. Opt. Lett. 18, 1505 (1993)Google Scholar
  15. E. Zeek et al. Opt. Lett. 24, 493 (1999)Google Scholar
  16. F. Verluise et al. Opt. Lett. 25, 575 (2000)Google Scholar
  17. R. Bartels et al. Nature 406, 164 (2000)Google Scholar
  18. R. Bartels {et al.} Chem. Phys. 267, 277 (2001)Google Scholar
  19. D.H. Reitze et al. Opt. Lett. 29, 86 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. T. Pfeifer, U. Weichmann, S. Zipfel, G. Gerber J. Mod. Opt. 50, 705 (2003)Google Scholar
  21. A. Rundquist et al. Science 280, 1412 (1998)Google Scholar
  22. M. Lewenstein et al. Phys. Rev. A 49, 2117 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. T. Baumert et al. Appl. Phys. B 65, 779 (1997)Google Scholar
  24. Y. Mairesse et al. Science 302, 1540 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. K. Burnett, V.C. Reed, J. Cooper, P.L. Knight Phys. Rev. A 45, 3347 (1992)Google Scholar
  26. I.P. Christov, R. Bartels, H.C. Kapteyn, M.M. Murnane Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5458 (2001)Google Scholar
  27. A. Baltuška et al. Nature 421, 611 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Pfeifer
    • 1
  • D. Walter
    • 1
  • C. Winterfeldt
    • 1
  • C. Spielmann
    • 1
  • G. Gerber
    • 1
  1. 1.Physikalisches InstitutUniversität WürzburgWürzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations