Applied Physics B

, Volume 79, Issue 3, pp 273–277 | Cite as

Continuous-variable quantum key distribution using polarization encoding and post selection

Article

Abstract

We present an experimental demonstration of a quantum key distribution protocol using coherent polarization states. Post selection is used to ensure a low error rate and security against beam-splitting attacks even in the presence of high losses. Signal encoding and readout in polarization bases avoids the difficult task of sending a local oscillator with the quantum channel. This makes our setup robust and easy to implement. A shared key was established for losses up to 64%.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    For a review see: N. Gisin, G.G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, H. Zbinden: Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 145 (2002)ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Brassard, N. Lütkenhaus, T. Mor, B.C. Sanders: Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1330 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.H. Bennett: Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3121 (1992)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Huttner, N. Imoto, N. Gisin, T. Mor: Phys. Rev. A 51, 1863 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Namiki, T. Hirano: Phys. Rev. A 67, 022308 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G.A. Barbosa, E. Corndorf, P. Kumar, H.P. Yuen: Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 227901 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. Silberhorn, T.C. Ralph, N. Lütkenhaus, G. Leuchs: Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 167901 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Grosshans, P. Grangier: quant-ph/0204127 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Grosshans, G. Van Assche, J. Wenger, R. Brouri, N.J. Cerf, Ph. Grangier: Nature 421, 238 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Hirano, T. Konishi, R. Namiki: quant-ph/0008037 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Hirano, H. Yamanaka, M. Ashikaga, T. Konishi, R. Namiki: Phys. Rev. A 68, 042331 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.J. Glauber: Phys. Rev. 131, 2766 1963Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Horak: quant-ph/0306138 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. Korolkova, G. Leuchs, R. Loudon, T.C. Ralph, Ch. Silberhorn: Phys. Rev. A 65, 052306 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Brassard, L. Salvail: ‘Secret-key Reconciliation by Public Discussion’. In: Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT ’93 (Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 765), ed. by T. Helleseth (Springer, Berlin 1994) p. 410Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Kurtsiefer, P. Zarda, M. Halder, H. Weinfurter, P.M. Gorman, P.R. Tapster, J.G. Rarity: Nature 419, 450 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Zbinden, H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci, N. Gisin, G. Ribordy: Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt. 67, 743 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Optics, Information and Photonics, Max Planck Research GroupUniversity Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany
  2. 2.School of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of St. AndrewsSt. AndrewsUK

Personalised recommendations