Applied Physics B

, Volume 79, Issue 1, pp 51–55 | Cite as

Study of ultra-fast optical pulse propagation in a nonlinear directional coupler



We showed that the application of a soliton in a nonlinear coupler does not show a better switching performance than a Gaussian pulse, unlike what the existing theory expected. Like the Gaussian pulse, a soliton could also suffer distortion, broadening, or narrowing in a nonlinear directional coupler. In addition, by using a new normalized format the linearly coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations were investigated. For the first time, we found that both the coupling behavior and the switching performance of pulses in a nonlinear coupler depend on the product of the coupling coefficient and the dispersion length. We also showed that for a given nonlinear coupler with a Gaussian-like or soliton-like pulse input, switching performance and whether a pulse breaks up or not mainly depend on the input pulse width, not the pulse shape.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S.M. Jensen: IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-18, 1580 (1981) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.T. Pham, L.N. Binh: J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 8, 1914 (1991) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. Wang: IEEE J. Lightwave Technol. 17, 292 (1999) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Wang, J. Liu: IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 11, 72 (1999) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Kitayama, S. Wang: Appl. Phys. Lett. 43, 17 (1983) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Hoffe, J. Chrostowski: Opt. Commun. 57, 34 (1986) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. Thirstrup: IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-31, 2101 (1995) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Wang, C.K. Lee: Appl. Phys. B 72, 417 (2001) ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.R. Friberg, A.M. Weiner, Y. Silberberg, B.G. Sfez, P.S. Smith: Opt. Lett. 13, 904 (1988) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S.R. Friberg, Y. Silberger, M.K. Oliver, M.J. Andrejco, M.A. Saifi, P.W. Smith: Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 1135 (1987) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.M. Weiner, Y. Silberberg, H. Fouckhardt, D.E. Leaird, M.A. Saifi, M.J. Andrejco, P.W. Smith: IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-25, 2648 (1989) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Trillo, S. Wabnitz, E.M. Wright, G.I. Stegman: Opt. Lett. 13, 672 (1988) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    P.M. Ramos, C.R. Paiva: J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 17, 1125 (2000) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P.L. Chu, B.A. Malomed, G.D. Peng: J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 10, 1379 (1993) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G.P. Agrawal: Nonlinear Fiber Optics (Academic, San Diego 1989) Chaps. 3 and 4 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y. Wang, W. Wang: IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 16, 1077 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Optical Fiber DepartmentAgilent Technologies Singapore Pte. Ltd.SingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Division of Physics and AstronomyVrije University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations