Analytical modeling of lack-of-fusion porosity in metal additive manufacturing
- 93 Downloads
This work presents a physics-based analytical modeling methodology for the prediction of the lack-of-fusion porosity in powder bed metal additive manufacturing (PBMAM) considering the molten pool geometry, powder size variation, and packing. The presented model has promising short computational time without resorting to the finite element method or any iteration-based simulations. The temperature profiles were calculated using a closed-form temperature solution. Multiple transverse sectional areas of the molten pool geometry were plotted on a cross-sectional area of the part based on hatch space and layer thickness to calculate the lack-of-fusion area. The powder bed porosity was calculated using advancing front approach with consideration of powder statistical distribution and powder packing. The part porosity was converted from the calculated lack-of-fusion area by multiplying the calculated powder bed porosity. Acceptable agreements were observed upon validation against experimental measurements under various process conditions in PBMAM of Ti6Al4V. The computational time was recorded less than 26 s for the porosity calculation of five consecutive layers. The presented model has high prediction accuracy and high computational efficiency, which allow the porosity calculation for large-scale parts and process parameters planning through inverse analysis, and thus improves the usefulness of analytical modeling in real applications.
KeywordsLack-of-fusion porosity Powder bed metal additive manufacturing Closed-form temperature solution Statistical powder size variation and packing High computational efficiency
The authors would like to acknowledge the funding support from The Boeing Company.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.J.J. Lewandowski, M. Seifi, Metal additive manufacturing: a review of mechanical properties. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 46, 151–186 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-032024 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.H. Yi, L. Qi, J. Luo, N. Li, Hole-defects in soluble core assisted aluminum droplet printing: Metallurgical mechanisms and elimination methods. Appl. Therm. Eng. 148, 1183–1193 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.12.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.C. Teng, H. Gong, A. Szabo, J.J.S. Dilip, K. Ashby, S. Zhang, N. Patil, D. Pal, B. Stucker, Simulating melt pool shape and lack of fusion porosity for selective laser melting of cobalt chromium components. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 139(1), 011009 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.M. Bayat, S. Mohanty, J.H. Hattel, Multiphysics modelling of lack-of-fusion voids formation and evolution in IN718 made by multi-track/multi-layer L-PBF. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 139, 95–114 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.M. Van Elsen, M. Baelmans, P. Mercelis, J.P. Kruth, Solutions for modelling moving heat sources in a semi-infinite medium and applications to laser material processing. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 50(23–24), 4872–4882 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.02.044 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 31.D. Rosenthal, The theory of moving sources of heat and its application of metal treatments. Trans. ASME 68, 849–866 (1946)Google Scholar
- 32.J. Ning, D.E. Sievers, H. Garmestani, S.Y. Liang, Analytical modeling of in-process temperature in powder bed additive manufacturing considering laser power absorption, latent heat, scanning strategy, and powder packing. Materials 12(5), 808 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12050808 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.J. Ning, E. Mirkoohi, Y. Dong, D.E. Sievers, H. Garmestani, S.Y. Liang, Analytical modeling of 3D temperature distribution in selective laser melting of Ti-6Al-4V considering part boundary conditions. J. Manuf. Process. 44, 319–326 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.06.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.J. Ning, D.E. Sievers, H. Garmestani, S.Y. Liang, Analytical modeling of in-process temperature in powder feed metal additive manufacturing considering heat transfer boundary condition. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Green Technol. Int. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-019-00164-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.J. Ning, V. Nguyen, Y. Huang, K.T. Hartwig, S.Y. Liang, Inverse determination of Johnson-Cook model constants of ultra-fine-grained titanium based on chip formation model and iterative gradient search. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 99(5–8), 1131–1140 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2508-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.J.J.S. Dilip, S. Zhang, C. Teng, K. Zeng, C. Robinson, D. Pal, B. Stucker, Influence of processing parameters on the evolution of melt pool, porosity, and microstructures in Ti-6Al-4V alloy parts fabricated by selective laser melting. Prog. Addit. Manuf. 2(3), 157–167 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-017-0030-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.M.D. Abramoff, P.J. Magalhaes, S.J. Ram, Image processing with ImageJ. Biophoton. Int. 11(7), 36–42 (2004). https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
- 46.I.A. Roberts, C.J. Wang, R. Esterlein, M. Stanford, D.J. Mynors, A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the temperature field during laser melting of metal powders in additive layer manufacturing. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 49(12–13), 916–923 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar