Advertisement

Applied Physics A

, 122:322 | Cite as

Nanotechnologies for the restoration of alum-treated archaeological wood

  • Fabrizio Andriulo
  • Susan Braovac
  • Hartmut Kutzke
  • Rodorico Giorgi
  • Piero Baglioni
Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Sustainable solutions for restoration and conservation of cultural heritage

Abstract

The project Saving Oseberg is funded by the Norwegian State with the aim to preserve the Viking Age wooden objects from the Oseberg burial mound. They were excavated in 1904 near Tønsberg, Norway, and many have been treated in the past with alum salts (KAl(SO4)2·12H2O). Alum was widely used during the early 1900s as a treatment for archaeological wood to prevent shrinkage and impart strength. In the 1990s, conservators observed an alarming condition of the objects. Initial investigations showed that the alum treatment has initiated a slow but ongoing deterioration process, attacking the wood for over 100 years. Today, the artefacts are highly acidic and have significantly reduced mechanical strength. In the last decade, the use of non-aqueous alkaline nanoparticle dispersions has provided successful results for the protection of cellulose-based materials. Alum-treated archaeological wood samples from Oseberg, with a pH ≤ 2, have been treated with alkaline nanoparticle dispersions, and the effects of the treatment have been evaluated by thermal analysis (TG-DTG), infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) and X-ray microtomography (micro-CT) analyses. In this contribution, the preliminary results will be presented.

Keywords

Lignin Wood Sample Calcium Hydroxide Alum Treatment Archaeological Sample 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

F.A., R.G. and P.B. wish to thank Dr. Francesca Loglio and Dr. Samuele Ciattini of the CRIST center, Centro di Cristallografia Strutturale, University of Florence, for X-ray microtomography analysis. CSGI, Center for Colloid and Surface Science, is also gratefully acknowledged for financial support. This work was undertaken by Saving Oseberg, a research project funded by the Norwegian State and the University of Oslo.

References

  1. 1.
    N. Bonde, A.E. Christensen, Antiquity 67, 575 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.W. Brøgger, H. Shetelig, H. Falk, Osebergfundet (Distribuert ved Universitetets Oldsaksamling, Oslo, 1917)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B.B. Christensen, Studies in Museum Technology 1: The Conservation of Waterlogged Wood in the National Museum of Denmark (The National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, 1970)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Braovac, H. Kutzke, J. Cult. Herit. 13, 203 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Almkvist, I. Persson, Holzforschung 62(6), 694 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Giorgi, D. Chelazzi, P. Baglioni, Langmuir 21, 10743 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. Fors, M. Sandstrom, Chem. Soc. Rev. 35, 399 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Calvini, V. Grosso, M. Hey, L. Rossi, L. Santucci, Pap. Conserv. 12, 35 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Poggi, N. Toccafondi, L.N. Melita, J.C. Knowles, L. Bozec, R. Giorgi, P. Baglioni, Appl. Phys. A 114, 685 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Baglioni, D. Chelazzi, Nanoscience for the Conservation of Works of Art (RSC Publishing, London, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Baglioni, R. Giorgi, Soft Matter 2, 293 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Baglioni, D. Chelazzi, R. Giorgi, G. Poggi, in Encyclopedia of Surface and Colloid Science, 2nd edn., ed. by P. Somasundaran (Taylor & Francis, New York, 2012), pp. 1–16Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Chelazzi, R. Giorgi, P. Baglioni, Macromol. Symp. 238, 30 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C.F. Forney, D.G. Brandl, HortTechnology 2, 52 (1992)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.W. Baty, W. Minter, S. Yong Lee, Book Pap. Group Annu. 29, 113 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Földvári, in Handbook of Thermogravimetric System of Minerals and its Use in Geological Practice, Occasional Papers of the Geological Institute of Hungary, vol 213 (Geological Institute of Hungary, Budapest, 2011), pp. 216–217Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H.A. Shnawa, Mater. Sci. Appl. 2, 692 (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    K.K. Pandey, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 71, 1969 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    K.K. Pandey, A.J. Pitman, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 52, 151 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    B. Mohebby, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation 55, 247 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Y. Liu, A. Wang, J.J. Freeman, in Raman, MIR, and NIR Spectroscopic study of calcium sulfates: gypsum, bassanite, and anhydrite, 40th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    F.A. Andersen, L. Brečević, Acta Chem. Scand. 45, 1018 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabrizio Andriulo
    • 1
  • Susan Braovac
    • 2
  • Hartmut Kutzke
    • 2
  • Rodorico Giorgi
    • 1
  • Piero Baglioni
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry Ugo Schiff and CSGIUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Museum of Cultural HistoryUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations