Neutron activation autoradiography and scanning macro-XRF of Rembrandt van Rijn’s Susanna and the Elders (Gemäldegalerie Berlin): a comparison of two methods for imaging of historical paintings with elemental contrast
- 695 Downloads
Imaging methods with elemental contrast are of great value for the investigation of historical paintings, as they allow for study of sub-surface layers that provide insight into a painting’s creation process. Two of the most important methods are neutron activation autoradiography (NAAR) and scanning macro-XRF (MA-XRF). Given the differences between these methods in the fundamental physical phenomena exploited, a theoretical comparison of their capabilities is difficult and until now a critical comparison of their use on the same painting is missing. In this paper, we present a study of Rembrandt van Rijn’s painting Susanna and the Elders from the Gemäldegalerie in Berlin employing both techniques. The painting features a considerable number of overpainted features and a wide range of pigments with different elemental tracers, including earth pigments (Mn/Fe), Azurite (Cu), lead white (Pb), vermilion (Hg) and smalt (Co, As). MA-XRF can detect all elements above Si (Z = 14), suffers from few spectral overlaps and can be performed in a few tens of hours in situ, i.e. in a museum. NAAR requires the stay of the painting at a research facility for several weeks, and inter-element interferences can be difficult to resolve. Also, only a limited number of elements contribute to the acquired autoradiographs, most notably Mn, Cu, As, Co, Hg and P. However, NAAR provides a higher lateral resolution and is less hindered by absorption in covering layers, which makes it the only method capable of visualizing P in lower paint layers.
KeywordsLateral Resolution Paint Layer Lead White Distribution Image Orpiment
This research was supported by the Interuniversity Attraction Poles Programme–Belgian Science Policy (IUAP VI/16). The text also presents the results of GOA “XANES meets ELNES” (Research Fund University of Antwerp, Belgium) and from FWO (Brussels, Belgium) Project Nos. G.0704.08 and G.01769.09. M. Alfeld received from 2009 to 2013 a PhD fellowship of the Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO).
- 2.C.-O. Fischer, C. Laurenze-Landsberg, C. Schmidt, K. Slusallek, Restauro 105, 426 (1999)Google Scholar
- 5.M.W. Ainsworth, J. Brealey, M.J. Cotter, K. Groen, E. Haverkamp-Begemann, P. Meyers, E.V. Sayre, L. van Zelst, Art and Autoradiography: Insight Into the Genesis of Paintings by Rembrandt, Van Dyck and Vermeer (Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 1982)Google Scholar
- 6.C.-O. Fischer, J. Kelch, C. Laurenze, W. Leuther, K. Slusallek, Restauro 94, 259 (1988)Google Scholar
- 7.C.-O. Fischer, J. Kelch, C. Laurenze, W. Leuther, K. Slusallek, Kerntechnik 51, 9 (1987)Google Scholar
- 16.M. Alfeld, K. Janssens, K. Appel, B. Thijsse, J. Blaas, J. Dik, Z. Kunsttechnol. Konserv. 25, 157 (2011)Google Scholar
- 22.M. Franken, in Album Discipulorum, ed. by J.R.J. van Asperen de Boer (Waanders, Zwolle, 1997), pp. 66–73Google Scholar
- 23.M. Franken, in Rembrandt: Quest of a Genius, ed. by E. van de Wetering (Waanders, Zwolle, 2006), pp. 153–177Google Scholar
- 29.D. Bomford, J. Kirby, A. Roy, A. Rüger, R. White, Art in the Making: Rembrandt (National Gallery Company, London, 2006), pp. 35–47Google Scholar
- 30.P. Noble, A. van Loon, M. Alfeld, K. Janssens, J. Dik, Technè 35, 36 (2012)Google Scholar