Anti-graffiti nanocomposite materials for surface protection of a very porous stone
- 466 Downloads
- 11 Citations
Abstract
The preservation of stone substrates from defacement induced by graffiti represents a very challenging task, which can be faced by applying suitable protective agents on the surface. Although different anti-graffiti materials have been developed, it is often found that their effectiveness is unsatisfactory, most of all when applied on very porous stones, e.g. Lecce stone. The aim of this work was to study the anti-graffiti behaviour of new nanocomposite materials obtained by dispersing montmorillonite nanoparticles (layered aluminosilicates with a high-aspect ratio) into a fluorinated polymer matrix (a fluorinated polyurethane based on perfluoropolyether blocks). Polymeric structure was modified by inducing a cross-linking process, in order to produce a durable anti-graffiti coating with enhanced barrier properties. Several composites were prepared using a naturally occurring and an organically modified montmorillonite clay (1, 3, and 5 % w/w concentrations). Materials were applied on Lecce stone specimens, and then their treated surfaces were soiled by a black ink permanent marker or by a black acrylic spray paint. Several repeated staining/cleaning cycles were performed in order to evaluate anti-graffiti effectiveness. Colorimetric measurements were selected to assess the anti-graffiti performance. It was found that the presence of 3 % w/w organically modified montmorillonite in the polymer coating is enough to induce a durable anti-graffiti effect when the stone surface is stained by acrylic paint. Less promising results are obtained when staining by permanent marker is considered as all the investigated treatments afford a reasonable protection from ink only for the first staining/cleaning cycle.
Keywords
Contact Angle Montmorillonite Nanocomposite Material Water Vapour Permeability Static Contact AngleReferences
- 1.E. Doehne, C.A. Price, Stone Conservation: an Overview of Current Research, 2nd edn. (The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, 2010)Google Scholar
- 2.R. Fort, M. Alvarez de Buergo, M. Gomez-Heras, C. Vazquez-Calvo, Heritage, Weathering and Conservation Two Volume Set, Proceedings of the International Heritage, Weathering and Conservation Conference (HWC-2006) (Taylor & Francis, London, 2006)Google Scholar
- 3.H.R. Sasse, R. Snethlage (eds.), Saving Our Architectural Heritage: The Conservation of Historic Stone Structures (Wiley, NY, 1997), pp. 223–243Google Scholar
- 4.Methods of Evaluating Products for the Conservation of Porous Building Materials in Monuments (ICCROM, Rome, 1995)Google Scholar
- 5.K. Manczyk, K. Manczyk, B. Trzebicka, A. Dworak, Polimery 53, 830–835 (2008)Google Scholar
- 6.A. Zielnik, J. Archit. Coat. 1, 70–73 (2005)Google Scholar
- 7.T. Bengtsson, in Proceedings of the European Coatings Conference “Antigraffiti Coatings” (Berlin, Germany, December 2–3, 1999) pp. 169–189Google Scholar
- 8.G. Alessandrini, M. Aglietto, V. Castelvetro, F. Ciardelli, R. Peruzzi, L. Toniolo, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 76, 962–977 (2000)Google Scholar
- 9.R. Stadler, A. Maier, N. Steidl, Eur. Coat. J. 7–8, 63 (2003)Google Scholar
- 10.J. Scheerder, N. Visscher, T. Nabuurs, A. Overbeek, J. Coat. Tech. Res. 2, 617–625 (2005)Google Scholar
- 11.A. Tarnowski, X. Zhang, C. McNamara, S.T. Martin, R. Mitchell, J. ACCR (Association canadienne pour la conservation et la restauration) 32, 3–16 (2007)Google Scholar
- 12.P.M. Carmona-Quiroga, S. Martínez-Ramírez, M.T. Blanco-Varela, Materiales de Construccion 58, 233–246 (2008)Google Scholar
- 13.P.M. Carmona-Quiroga, S. Martínez-Ramírez, S. Sánchez-Cortés, M. Oujja, M. Castillejo, M.T. Blanco-Varela, J. Cult. Herit. 11, 297–303 (2010)Google Scholar
- 14.D. Sianesi, G. Marchionni, R.J. De Pasquale, in Organo-Fluorine Chemistry: Principles and Commercial Applications, ed. by R.E. Banks (Plenum Press, New York, 1994), pp. 431–461Google Scholar
- 15.F. Piacenti, F. Ciampelli, A. Pasetti, US Patent 4,499,146 (1981)Google Scholar
- 16.P. Frediani, C. Manganelli del Fa, U. Matteoli, P. Tiano, Stud. Conserv. 27, 31–37 (1982)Google Scholar
- 17.F. Piacenti, Sci. Total Environ. 143, 113 (1994)Google Scholar
- 18.G. Moggi, A. Scala, A. Pasetti, F. Piacenti, in Proceedings of VI International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone (Torun, Poland, September 12–14, 1988), pp. 673–679Google Scholar
- 19.F. Piacenti, C. Manganelli Del Fà, G. Moggi, A. Pasetti, A. Scala, U.S. Patent 4,902,538 (1990)Google Scholar
- 20.U. Matteoli, A. Pasetti, F. Piacenti, E. Strepparola, U.S. Patent 4,475,009Google Scholar
- 21.E. Strepparola, G. Caporiccio, A. Pasetti, F. Piacenti, U.S. Patent 4,746,550 (1988)Google Scholar
- 22.F. Piacenti, M. Camaiti, E. Strepparola, G. Moggi, J. Fluor. Chem. 58, 220 (1992)Google Scholar
- 23.F. Federici, E. Cozzi, P. Parrini, US Patent 5,064,926 (1991)Google Scholar
- 24.E. Cozzi, F. Federici, P. Parrini, US Patent 5,189,135 (1993)Google Scholar
- 25.T. Trombetta, P. Iengo, S. Turri, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 98, 1364–1372 (2005)Google Scholar
- 26.M. Licchelli, S.J. Marzolla, A. Poggi, C. Zanchi, J. Cult. Herit. 12, 34–43 (2011)Google Scholar
- 27.S. İşçi, F.S. Güner, Ö. Işık Ece, N. Güngör, Prog. Org. Coat. 54, 28 (2005)Google Scholar
- 28.K.G. Bhattacharyya, S.S. Gupta, Adv. Coll. Int. Sci. 140, 114 (2008)Google Scholar
- 29.J. Xiong, Z. Zheng, H. Jiang, S. Ye, X. Wang, Compos. A 38, 132 (2007)Google Scholar
- 30.C. Su, Y. Shen, J. Coll. Int. Sci. 332, 11 (2009)Google Scholar
- 31.L. D’Arienzo, P. Scarfato, L. Incarnato, J. Cult. Herit. 9, 253–260 (2008)Google Scholar
- 32.S.S. Ray, M. Okamoto, Prog. Polym. Sci. 28, 1539 (2003)Google Scholar
- 33.S.A. Madbouly, J.U. Otaigbe, Prog. Polym. Sci. 34, 1283 (2009)Google Scholar
- 34.J. Yeh, K. Chang, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 14, 275 (2008)Google Scholar
- 35.A. Pegoretti, A. Dorigato, M. Brugnara, A. Penati, Eur. Polym. J. 44, 1662 (2008)Google Scholar
- 36.R.P. Moraes, T.S. Valera, A.M.C. Pereira, N.R. Demarquette, A.M. Santos, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 119, 3658 (2011)Google Scholar
- 37.O. Yilmaz, C.N. Cheaburu, D. Durraccio, G. Gulumser, C. Vasile, Appl. Clay Sci. 49, 288 (2010)Google Scholar
- 38.S. Subramani, J. Lee, S. Choi, J.H. Kim, J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 45, 2747 (2007)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 39.X. Wu, R.P. Rosen, J.C.T. Coat. Tech. 5, 28–37 (2008)Google Scholar
- 40.S. Bugani, M. Camaiti, L. Morselli, E. Van de Casteele, K. Janssens, X-Ray Spectrom. 36, 316–320 (2007)Google Scholar
- 41.P. Croveri, M Chiavarini, in Proceedings of 9th International Congress on the Deterioration and Preservation of Stones, vol. 2, ed. by V. Fassina (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000), pp. 263–271Google Scholar
- 42.A. Calia, A.M. Mecchi, G. Quarta, in Proceedings of 9th International Congress on the Deterioration and Preservation of Stones, vol. 1, ed. by V. Fassina (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000), pp. 49–58Google Scholar
- 43.UNI 10921:2001, Beni culturali—Materiali lapidei naturali ed artificiali—Prodotti idrorepellenti—Applicazione su provini e determinazione in laboratorio delle loro caratteristiche (2001)Google Scholar
- 44.A.Z. Miller, M.A. Rogerio-Candelera, A. Dionisio, M.F. Macedo, C. Saiz-Jimenez, Materiales de Construccion 62, 411–424 (2012)Google Scholar
- 45.S. Bugani, Study of the Interactions Between Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Stone Materials Treated wiith Conservation Products, Thesis (University of Bologna, Italy, 2004)Google Scholar
- 46.A.Z. Miller, A. Dionisio, L. Laiz, M.F. Macedo, C. Saiz-Jimenez, Ann. Microbiol. 59, 705–713 (2009)Google Scholar
- 47.E. Vasanelli, M. Sileo, A. Calia, M.A. Aiello, Procedia Chem. 8, 35–44 (2013)Google Scholar
- 48.M. Licchelli, M. Malagodi, M.L. Weththimuni, C. Zanchi, Prog. Org. Coat. 76, 495–503 (2013)Google Scholar
- 49.UNI EN 15802:2010, Conservazione dei beni culturali—Metodi di prova—Determinazione dell’angolo di contatto statico (2010)Google Scholar
- 50.UNI EN 15801:2010, Conservazione dei beni culturali—Metodi di prova—Determinazione dell’assorbimento dell’acqua per capillarità (2010)Google Scholar
- 51.Italian Recommendation NORMAL 21/85: Permeabilità al Vapor d’Acqua, ICR-CNR, Rome, Italy (1985)Google Scholar
- 52.UNI EN 15886:2010, Conservazione dei Beni Culturali—Metodi di prova—Misura del colore delle superfici (2010)Google Scholar
- 53.S. J. Marzolla, Functionalised fluorinated polymers for the protection of stone substrates from graffiti, PhD Thesis, University of Pavia, Italy (2005)Google Scholar
- 54.M. Brugnara, C. Della Volpe, A. Penati, S. Siboni, T. Poli, L. Toniolo, Ann. Chim. 93, 881–888 (2003)Google Scholar
- 55.M. Brugnara, E. Degasperi, C. Della Volpe, D. Maniglio, A. Penati, S. Siboni, L. Toniolo, T. Poli, S. Invernizzi, V. Castelvetro, Colloid Surf A 241, 299–312 (2004)Google Scholar
- 56.A. Tsakalof, P. Manoudis, I. Karapanagiotis, I. Chryssoulakis, C. Panayiotou, J. Cult. Herit. 8, 69–72 (2007)Google Scholar
- 57.L. Toniolo, T. Poli, V. Castelvetro, A. Manariti, O. Chiantore, M. Lazzari, J. Cult. Herit. 3, 309–316 (2002)Google Scholar
- 58.E. Borrelli, B. Caballero Moreno, G. Vigliano, Axum project: testing of anti-graffiti products (ICCROM, Rome, 2000)Google Scholar
- 59.V. Massa, E. Falcone, V. Guidetti, M. Chiavarini, in Durability of building materials and components 7, vol. 2, ed. by C. Sjöström, (E & FN Spon, London, 1996), pp. 1273–1281Google Scholar