Mechanical and fracture behaviors of defective silicon nanowires: combined effects of vacancy clusters, temperature, wire size, and shape
- 313 Downloads
- 11 Citations
Abstract
Abstract The coupled effects of vacancy clusters (VCs), temperature, wire size, and geometry on the mechanical and fracture behaviors of defective silicon nanowires (Si NWs) were investigated using molecular dynamics modeling with Tersoff potential. The formation energies (E v ) of a monovacancy (3.933 eV) and a tetrahedron vacancy (10.189 eV) obtained in this study agree well with experimental results and ab initio calculation. Simulation results show that the slip deformations of defective Si NWs are triggered at the wire’s surface and edge due to the number of dangling bonds on the wire’s surface being much greater than that inside a vacancy defect. VC defects barely affect to the value of Young’s modulus, but substantially weaken the ultimate strength of wires with a small cross-sectional size. With decreasing wire size and increasing operation temperature, significant reductions in Young’s modulus and fracture strength were observed. The average Young’s modulus for square NWs was about 3.7 % higher than that of wires with a circular shape due to the surface facet effect. A brittle-to-ductile transition (BDT) occurred for [001]-oriented Si NWs with a lateral size≤5.43 nm and an operation temperature T≥300 K.
Keywords
Ultimate Strength Vacancy Cluster Vacancy Formation Energy Wire Size Atomic VacancyNotes
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the National Science Council of Taiwan for financially supporting this research under grants NSC 100-2221-E-020-023- MY2 and NSC 101-2622-E-020-005-CC3.
References
- 1.Z.L. Wang, J. Song, Science 312, 242–246 (2006) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.A. Colli, S. Hofmann, A. Fasoli, A.C. Ferrari, C. Ducati, R.E. Dunin-Borkowski, J. Robertson, Appl. Phys. A 85, 247–253 (2006) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.S. Choi, A.P. Pisano, Appl. Phys. A 107(2), 421–428 (2012) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.J. Andzane, N. Petkov, A.I. Livshits, J.J. Boland, J.D. Holmes, D. Erts, Nano Lett. 9, 1824 (2009) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.J.L. Liu, Y. Lu, Y. Shi, S.L. Gu, R.L. Jiang, F. Wang, Y.D. Zheng, Appl. Phys. A 66, 539–541 (1998) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Y. Zhu, F. Xu, Q. Qin, W.Y. Fung, W. Lu, Nano Lett. 9, 3934–3939 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.V. Schmidt, S. Senz, U. Gosele, Appl. Phys. A 80, 445–450 (2005) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.S. Cuenot, C. Fretigny, S. Demoustier-Champagne, B. Nysten, Phys. Rev. B 69, 165410 (2004) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.G. Jing, X. Zhang, D. Yu, Appl. Phys. A 100, 473–478 (2010) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.J.C. Gonzalez et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 126103 (2004) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.B. Lee, R.E. Rudd, Phys. Rev. B 75, 041305 (2007) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.M. Bruno, M. Palummo, A. Marini, R.D. Sole, V. Olevano, A.N. Kholod, S. Ossicini, Phys. Rev. B 72, 153310 (2005) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.L. Zhang, H. Huang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 023115 (2007) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.H. Liang, M. Upmanyu, H. Huang, Phys. Rev. B 71, 241403(R) (2005) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.P.H. Huang, J.K. Kuo, Appl. Phys. A, Mater. Sci. Process. 103, 1083–1092 (2011) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.C. Ji, H.S. Park, Nanotechnology 18, 305704 (2007) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.P.H. Huang, H.Y. Lai, Phys. Rev. B 77, 125408 (2008) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.P.H. Huang, H.Y. Lai, Nanotechnology 19, 255701 (2008) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.M. Menon, D. Srivastava, I. Ponomareva, L.A. Chernozatonskii, Phys. Rev. B 70, 125313 (2004) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.K. Kang, W. Cai, Int. J. Plast. 26, 1387–1401 (2010) CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 21.D. Srivastava, M. Menon, I. Ponomareva, Nano Lett. 7(5), 1155–1159 (2007) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.W.W. Zhang, Q.A. Huang, H. Yu, L.B. Lu, Adv. Mater. Res. 60–61, 315–319 (2009) Google Scholar
- 23.S.H. Park, J.S. Kim, J.H. Park, J.S. Lee, Y.K. Choi, O.M. Kwon, Thin Solid Films 492, 285–289 (2005) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.A. Furmanchuk, O. Isayev, T.C. Dinadayalane, J. Leszczynski, J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 12283–12292 (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.J. Tersoff, Phys. Rev. B 38, 9902 (1988) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.J. Tersoff, Phys. Rev. B 39, 5566 (1989) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.D.J. Evans, W.G. Hoover, B.H. Failor, B. Moran, A.J.C. Ladd, Phys. Rev. A 28, 1016 (1983) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.J.N. Bright, D.J. Evans, D.J. Searles, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 194106 (2005) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.J.M. Haile, Molecular Dynamics Simulation: Elementary Methods (Wiley Interscience, New York, 1992) Google Scholar
- 30.J.G. Swadener, M.I. Baskes, M. Nastasi, Mater. Sci. 72, 201202 (2005) Google Scholar
- 31.M. Pei, W. Wang, B.C. Pan, Y.P. Li, Chin. Phys. Lett. 17, 215 (2000) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.S.K. Estreicher, J.L. Hastings, P.A. Fedders, Phys. Rev. B 57, 12663 (1998) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.A. Bongiorno, L. Colombo, Europhys. Lett. 43, 695 (1998) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.C.Z. Wang, C.T. Chan, K.M. Ho, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 189–192 (1991) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.G.D. Watkins, J.W. Corbett, Phys. Rev. 134, A1359 (1964) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.P.H. Huang, T.H. Fang, C.S. Chou, Curr. Appl. Phys. 11, 878–887 (2011) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.J.A. Zimmerman, C.L. Kelchner, P.A. Klein, J.C. Hamilton, S.M. Foiles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 165507 (2001) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.R.E. Miller, V.B. Shenoy, Nanotechnology 11, 139–147 (2000) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Q. Liu, S. Shen, Int. J. Plast. 38, 146–158 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar